Chris's 2nd GenxB Monday test shoot :)
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,559
From: La Crescenta, CA
Chris's 2nd GenxB Monday test shoot :)
It was just for fun, and still nothing really came out how I wanted but after some really QUICK editing some were worth at least sharing 
They were just some practice shoots for the real thing later This was all just for practice and fun so...
Wish I could get people to get it centered!!
I like this one
This is actually HDR. Can you tell?
Yuk! but some think it's cool! I need to do this over and over to get it right.
Have to do these over
Most were out of focus This one is too dark. I was too tired to edit anymore.
I need to do this again cause I need the practice!! My goal is to start pitching my work to car magazines so I can start to get paid for this ****
They were just some practice shoots for the real thing later This was all just for practice and fun so...Wish I could get people to get it centered!!
I like this one
This is actually HDR. Can you tell?
Yuk! but some think it's cool! I need to do this over and over to get it right.
Have to do these over
Most were out of focus This one is too dark. I was too tired to edit anymore.I need to do this again cause I need the practice!! My goal is to start pitching my work to car magazines so I can start to get paid for this ****
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,559
From: La Crescenta, CA
Originally Posted by D_Unit
i like what you did to the interior... did you paint it flat black? how'd you do it? also, get more pics of the interior you did...
http://infini.zenfolio.com/p65491731/
Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 93
From: tucson, az
Originally Posted by INFINI
El Cheapo Canon XT. Most important is I also used the 10-22mm and the 50mm 1.8. No lighting.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,303
From: Millbrae|SF|SJSU, CA
Originally Posted by INFINI
El Cheapo Canon XT. Most important is I also used the 10-22mm and the 50mm 1.8. No lighting.
i have the same camera with the 50mm f/1.4 and a 17-85mm f/3.5-4.5 and that seems to be good enough for me. i wish i could get better at post-processing..
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,559
From: La Crescenta, CA
hehe, well at 1.6 crop your 17-85mm f/3.5-4.5 is more like 33-120?
Why I bought the 10-22. When I was using the 5D with a Full Frame censer I have the 17-40 f/4 L and knew I needed to have a more realistic replacement.
Why I bought the 10-22. When I was using the 5D with a Full Frame censer I have the 17-40 f/4 L and knew I needed to have a more realistic replacement.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,303
From: Millbrae|SF|SJSU, CA
but with the EF-S mount the 17-85 was clearly designed for the Rebels and is clearly a kit lens replacement
for me i dont think my low skills warrant an upgrade to a full frame but i think i might go up to a XTi and steal your 10-22!
for me i dont think my low skills warrant an upgrade to a full frame but i think i might go up to a XTi and steal your 10-22!
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,559
From: La Crescenta, CA
Originally Posted by miketf1
but with the EF-S mount the 17-85 was clearly designed for the Rebels and is clearly a kit lens replacement
for me i dont think my low skills warrant an upgrade to a full frame but i think i might go up to a XTi and steal your 10-22!
for me i dont think my low skills warrant an upgrade to a full frame but i think i might go up to a XTi and steal your 10-22!
I like wide angle and landscapes so I had to justify the 10-22. The 17-85 is a great lense and yes a clear upgrade to the Kit!
