http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=47e_1191294022

i find it hard to believe that crappy looking honda can actually beat a lambo, check out for yourself.

Why? That CRX probably weighs 1800 lbs with a full tank and a driver. It probably only would need 300-350 whp to smoke that Lambo.

I'd still rather be driving that lambo.

the song in the video sucked dingle berries...

find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....

find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....


Yeah cuz towards the end a porsche and the crx race and the porsche smokes the crx.

Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?

And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>

Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?

And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>



The people that put ____ like that on the internet daily. lol

:lalala:
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Greenbeast-Supra-vs-2008_145565.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Supra-vs-LP640-Supra-in_146327.htm :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo

I know you weren't talking about the Supra vs tha lambo scionBoy86 cause that LP640 was Owned buy that Supra 8) and that Lambo was at full throttle and with a 2 second head start to boot :lalala:

Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big arse Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)

Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big arse Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
:lalala: :lalala: :lalala: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/700whp-CRX-VS-1200whp_168259.htm

ok this is just to get the honduh fanboys excited.

next u'll see a 198x civic hatch takin an Ferrari FXX or a Koenigsegg CCX...

then u'll see a 2007 Civic SI take a Ducati 999RR or an Aprilla...

that thing is staged!

u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo

http://youtube.com/watch?v=TWN_lbtVxIg :lalala:

I can't believe people are dumb enough to think this is fake. The CRX Si only weighs 1890 lbs from the factory. Gut the interior, lose the A/C, add some CF and it's easily down to 1500lbs. Throw a B18C5 or K20 in it, turbo it and you're looking at 350-400whp and 1700lbs. Now compare that to the Lambo which is at about 500whp and 3638. 100 HP =/= 1900 lbs.

Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?

makes sense to me haha

Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big arse Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
:lalala: :lalala: :lalala: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/700whp-CRX-VS-1200whp_168259.htm

that was from a dig.
the other video was from a roll.
big difference.

and thats also a 1200HP Supra Not a Lambo

Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?

o man.
if anyone argues with this they deserve a ban.
lol.

or they better provide a dammmn good counter argument with numbers and stats to back it up.

I'm at work so I haven't seen the video, but I can think of only two ways that a Honda CRX is going to beat a Lamborghini:

1. Stock lambo vs a highly modified CRX w/nitrous.

2. The Lambo driver was taking it easy on his new $200K car/engine.

Or...possibly both.

Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?

o man.
if anyone argues with this they deserve a ban.
lol.

or they better provide a dammmn good counter argument with numbers and stats to back it up.

^X2

I'm at work so I haven't seen the video, but I can think of only two ways that a Honda CRX is going to beat a Lamborghini:

1. Stock lambo vs a highly modified CRX w/nitrous.

2. The Lambo driver was taking it easy on his new $200K car/engine.

Or...possibly both.

ok you obviously dont know how to read.
IT IS A HIGHLY MODIFIED CRX.
With a Greater Power to Wieght Ratio than the Lambo.

ok you obviously dont know how to read.
IT IS A HIGHLY MODIFIED CRX.
With a Greater Power to Wieght Ratio than the Lambo.
And you obviously take this stuff way too seriously. I didn't read through all the posts. :yawn:

no not seriously.
just annoying when ppl continue to argue that this race was staged when enough evidence has already been provided to prove that the CRX could easily walk the Lambo.

no not seriously.
just annoying when ppl continue to argue that this race was staged when enough evidence has already been provided to prove that the CRX could easily walk the Lambo.
Oh, I agree. You could probably work up a Yugo to beat a Ferrari if you modify the hell out of it. Well...maybe not a Yugo. :P But you get my point. Once you modify a car enough, it's not really accurate to call it by it's original model name. Kinda like in NASCAR (which I never watch). The only think that makes that race car a Ford Tarus is the slight resemblence on the sheet metal.

and i agree with that as well.
you cant really call the scion tc drag car a scion tc, because its a completely diff platform.

Oh, I agree. You could probably work up a Yugo to beat a Ferrari if you modify the hell out of it. Well...maybe not a Yugo. :P

Maybe not a Yugo, but what about a Smart car (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5S1NAMnYKM)?

haha that be interesting with a smart car

now lets see a crx in a track or a crx losin control and hittin a wall see if the person survives in end...its a death trap

lamborghini will always be a lambo..its all motor of raw power and technolgy that is ridiculous

now lets see a crx in a track or a crx losin control and hittin a wall see if the person survives in end...its a death trap

lamborghini will always be a lambo..its all motor of raw power and technolgy that is ridiculous
Uh? First of all, a properly prepared CRX Si is amazing on the track. Second, TVR's are "all motor of raw power and technology that is ridiculous," but they're death traps as well. Call me crazy, but I don't judge the performance of a car by it's NHTSA rating.

now lets see a crx in a track or a crx losin control and hittin a wall see if the person survives in end...its a death trap

lamborghini will always be a lambo..its all motor of raw power and technolgy that is ridiculous

thats was a ridiculous statement.
a deathtrap you say? how bout saying why?
and technology that is ridiculous?
u couldnt be any more vague.

now lets see a crx in a track or a crx losin control and hittin a wall see if the person survives in end...its a death trap

lamborghini will always be a lambo..its all motor of raw power and technolgy that is ridiculous

Are you trying to say that Lambo's are safe cars?

all u guys think about is speed in a car...there is a lot more to it..a lamborghini is a lamborghini..no matter what u compare it to a super hooked up supra or whatever..it'll always be a toyota or honda...technology and appeal and safety, fit and finish is way ahead of those cars it'll never sound or drive like a ferrari,lamborghini,porshe,bugatti,

lets see if a chick would find a toyota or honda more appealin then a lamborghini LP640

it has far more class

u get what u pay for..end of story

yea exotics are wayyy overrated.

that supra is just straight up VIOLENT

and TVRs are probably the most dangerous car you'd want to sit in

still, i have to agree with scionboy.... a 1200hp toyota does not = panties dropping. thats what exotics are for =p

haha that be interesting with a smart car

they already do that with street bike engines in Smart cars.

all u guys think about is speed in a car...there is a lot more to it..a lamborghini is a lamborghini..no matter what u compare it to a super hooked up supra or whatever..it'll always be a toyota or honda...technology and appeal and safety, fit and finish is way ahead of those cars it'll never sound or drive like a ferrari,lamborghini,porshe,bugatti,

lets see if a chick would find a toyota or honda more appealin then a lamborghini LP640

it has far more class

u get what u pay for..end of story
Yep, you caught me; all I think about is speed in a car in a thread about the speed of a lightweight, modified Honda CRX vs. a Murcielago. If this were a thread about the panty drop factor of a CRX vs. Murcielago, I would be steering a bit more toward the Lambo (if participating at all, as it would be the dumbest thread on here). Maybe if you removed your head from Lamborghini's ___ long enough, you would see that we weren't even debating anything but power/weight ratio's and the legitimacy of the OP video.

lol.
CDogbert FTW again.

and idk what kinda girls you guys hang around. But a 1200HP Supra would drop just about every girls panties around here.
granted it may not drop them as fast as the lambo, but it still will. The CRX however...i doubt it. haha

Wait a minute. The girl would drop her panties for the car or the driver of that car? :rofl: Not all hot cars have hot drivers... :lalala:

Wait a minute. The girl would drop her panties for the car or the driver of that car? :rofl: Not all hot cars have hot drivers... :lalala:
That's where the golddigging slut factor comes in!

and plus ur comparin a car thats 1500pounds of sheet metal and probualy gutted to ____ and that has boost with another car thats ALL MOTOR.. u can do that with any car...lets see that lambo with a supercharger or turbo and see the outcome...u guys are dibs

Toyota will always be a toyota
honda will always be a honda
nissan will always be a nissan

if u have the money to buy a bugatti veyron,ferrari enzo, lamborghini lp640 what does it matter...a 1200hp supra probualy will come close to 200k with all the mods u put in it anyways and would never drive as smooth or sound like any exotic car or appeal to people then a car that looks like it came out from the movie fast and furious....

Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?

o man.
if anyone argues with this they deserve a ban.
lol.

or they better provide a dammmn good counter argument with numbers and stats to back it up.



1. BECAUSE JAPANESE ARE SMARTER THAN ITALIANS. DUHRRRR

and plus ur comparin a car thats 1500pounds of sheet metal and probualy gutted to poop and that has boost with another car thats ALL MOTOR.. u can do that with any car...lets see that lambo with a supercharger or turbo and see the outcome...u guys are dibs

Toyota will always be a toyota
honda will always be a honda
nissan will always be a nissan

if u have the money to buy a bugatti veyron,ferrari enzo, lamborghini lp640 what does it matter...a 1200hp supra probualy will come close to 200k with all the mods u put in it anyways and would never drive as smooth or sound like any exotic car or appeal to people then a car that looks like it came out from the movie fast and furious....
Way to show off your ability to state the obvious, bright eyes. We know that we're comparing a car that's 1500 lbs of sheet metal and boost; you are the one that seems to have trouble grasping the concept. And of course if you gave the Lamborghini a supercharger, it would win. If you gave my car fourteen turbochargers, it would walk all over both of them. I fail to see what point you're trying to make.

I see you took my advice about pulling your head out of Lamborghini's ___. Good job putting the LP640 in the same league as the Enzo or Veyron. Please, go up to anyone that owns either the Enzo or the Veyron, and see if they want to race you in your stupid LP640; they will straight up laugh at you. :loser:

Meh, my lock sense is tingling.

and plus ur comparin a car thats 1500pounds of sheet metal and probualy gutted to poop and that has boost with another car thats ALL MOTOR.. u can do that with any car...lets see that lambo with a supercharger or turbo and see the outcome...u guys are dibs

You don't like reading do you? Take a look at this, it's from this thread, but you've got your head so far up your own ___, I guess you didn't see it.

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Now look at the bold number. That magic number is easily obtainable on an N/A 4-Cyl. Hell, Peugeot has a 280hp semi-production 2.0L 4 cylinder. So with that said, we can consider this race N/A vs N/A.

Now, if you think it cost $200,000 to turn a $6,000 CRX into a 1500lb, 240whp vehicle, you are a moron.

And I'm sorry, but if you need to go out and buy a Lambo just to get laid, you suck at life.

:rofl:
wow.
you guys are terrible and tyrin to prove your point.
your not gonna win so just give up.

____ b18 shoulda went k20.

WWW.NORTHEASTCARCLUB.COM

You don't like reading do you?
I don't. :( Words are scary and overwhelming.

IN THE END

LAMBO = YOUR HAVING A FMF 3 SOME TONITE
CRX = .......

IN THE END

LAMBO = YOUR HAVING A FMF 3 SOME TONITE
CRX = .......
Actually,
LAMBO = You're having a circle jerk with other Lambo owners tonight
CRX = You're not

This thread has officially degraded into an offense to the automotive world.

like omgz, evryboddys knows that carz that costed more money iz betta. duh

IN THE END

LAMBO = YOUR HAVING A FMF 3 SOME TONITE
CRX = .......
Actually,
LAMBO = You're having a circle jerk with other Lambo owners tonight
CRX = You're not

This thread has officially degraded into an offense to the automotive world.

More like

Lambo = You're paying some whore to suck you off
CRX = You're sleeping with a 16 year old

IN THE END

LAMBO = YOUR HAVING A FMF 3 SOME TONITE
CRX = .......
Actually,
LAMBO = You're having a circle jerk with other Lambo owners tonight
CRX = You're not

This thread has officially degraded into an offense to the automotive world.

More like

Lambo = You're paying some whore to suck you off
CRX = You're sleeping with a 16 year old

lol.
either way.
fail.

More like

Lambo = You're paying some whore to suck you off (while your trophy wife screws the pool boy)
CRX = You're sleeping with a 16 year old
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Adding more Fuel to the fire :lalala:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5S1NAMnYKM :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

A honda is a honda and A Toyota supra is a Toyota supra A Smart car is a Smart car But at the end of the day My car beat yours. It's not about the girls it's about the street cred. Girls you can get anywhere. Street cred is earned. Guys with super cars dont like to push their cars to the limit because they cost to much to maintain & insurance is too high. Mean while the guy with the sleeper doesn't have to pay that much money to punk a super car. Back in the day that was impossible. It just goes to show that technology is catching up to these super cars which makes me think that these super cars have been over hyped and over priced. In my opinon, a super car should never have to be up graded in order to beat a cheap or mid priced japanese import. I mean come on you pay all this $$$ so you can be king of the hill and not be threatened by a 4 banger. What is that ? And yeah, super cars can get you girls but nothing is more humiliating then having your supercar get beat by a japanese import with your girl next to you thinking that you where untouchable on the street and look at you now. And for the people that say "well if you were to upgrade the super car to see what would happen?" I say how much did that upgrade cost you ?Ahh... the price of my sleeper ? So don't hate the sleeper hate the supercar maker for making you pay all that $$ just to get beat by a sleeper. Next time tell them to make a better car like one that actually races at the Le Mans 24-Hours. If I remeber correctly the GT1 v8 Corvette C6.R is winning that battle. Where are all those super cars? bugatti veyron, ferrari enzo, lamborghini lp640 are nowere to be found. Oh, my bad, the the 12 Cylinder ferrari F430 GTs are in GT2 class but that class is slower then GT1. Oh, and what car can drift and beat a ferrari with a motorcycle motor and have fun doing indos for very little cash?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLtMh20qIp8&feature=related :bow: :bow: :bow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV4HdsDZX6c&feature=related

Old isht but w/e...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Orje0u-lDc

Adding more Fuel to the fire :lalala:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5S1NAMnYKM :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I guess nobody can see when someone embeds a URL inside text like this (www.scionlife.com). I was wondering why nobody commented on my earlier post with that same YouTube video.

Next time tell them to make a better car like one that actually races at the Le Mans 24-Hours. If I remeber correctly the GT1 v8 Corvette C6.R is winning that battle. Where are all those super cars? bugatti veyron, ferrari enzo, lamborghini lp640 are nowere to be found. Oh, my bad, the the 12 Cylinder ferrari F430 GTs are in GT2 class but that class is slower then GT1. Oh, and what car can drift and beat a ferrari with a motorcycle motor and have fun doing indos for very little cash?
Oh come on now, you can't say that the Veyron/Enzo/LP640 should be running with the C6.R; they're completely different species of cars. And even moreso, the ALMS isn't the only series in the world. The MC12 GT1 (the FXX's sibling-ish thing) won a 2005 FIA GT cup. The Veyron is strictly a road car that only exists to be a yardstick for road cars. The LP640... eh, yeah, not very successful in motorsports.

That second video is hi-larious, too. All these videos just make me want to buy a second-hand Smart and stuff some ridiculous engine into it.

dayum i just saw the 2008 lambo reventon (sp?)

and i just jizzed.

Christ, that was fake. And what a doucher behind the heel of that Lambo.

Seems to me like some tools with a Lambo and a Honda got together and said "hurr hurr, you know what would be funny? If we took a video of the CRX walking the Lambo, put it on Streetfire, and watched everybody argue about it".

omg.
not another noob coming in here and saying its fake.

do yourself a favor.
go back to the first page and read every post...carefully!
theres been plenty of substantial evidence uncluding numbers posted to prove that this is not fake.

Effing idiots that don't understand power/weight. You guys need to go out more if you think this is fake. There are plenty of b18's out there capable of outdoing the Murcielago. Built and boosted ones can run upwards of 500 hp, and keep in mind the car weighs about half as much as the lambo. Also, unless you are illiterate, it said the Porsche has 700 hp, that's over a 100 more than the Lambo, plus its a Rear wheel drive platform so it loses less power to the wheels because of that.

but...but...but...
its a honda!
hooowwww!?!?

haha, but seriously, yea get out more, go watch some raced, do some research, or whatever it takes to get it through your thick skulls.

Contrived science < common sense.

ha.
yea, everyone know thats number prove absolutely nothing.
and what someone thinks will always be right despite the fact that it was proven it wasnt.

"I'm not gonna lie to you man, my pride's a little hurt" said with a wink and a nudge.

This video is such a joke, clearly dicking around between some friends. I'm sorry you're wasting your time trying to rationalize it.

im sorry that your completely oblivious to the fact that this is completely feasable.

if you knew anything about either one of these cars you would realize that. and if you went out everyweekend like myself and some of the other on these forums and had to negotiate to set up races you would understand power to weight ratios, drivetrains, etc...

Feasible, yes. I don't doubt that a CRX could be modified to beat a Lamborghini.

But this video is a load of bologna.

i own a TC, and I also own a civic that is swapped.......although my tc is newer, I love my civic way more...... that things moves

Wow, old thread is old.

this thread will never die.
someone always bumps it.