Weapon R intake has voided my waranty
I took my 05 tc 4/A with 21000 miles to gateway toyota in toms river, for a check engine light, i thought it may have to do someting with the exhaust and it did. The tech told me my intake caused my catalytic converter to burn out, and it would cost around $800 to repair. And to top that off they charged my $104 just to diagnose the problem with a OBD 2 scanner which is ridiculous. The dealership will not pay for and costs whatsoever. Is it really possible that my intake really caused my Cat to burn out?
they stated the intake caused a lean condition which burnt out my cat. how can i fight this, how can i prove the intake didnt cause the cat to burn out???? This is ongoing as of right now, i havent paid for any work yet i left my car at the dealer. Oh and the CEL code was i think po 2024, catalyst emmisions below threshold
Originally Posted by JMM8586
they stated the intake caused a lean condition which burnt out my cat. how can i fight this, how is it not possible
This is ongoing as of right now, i havent paid for any work yet i left my car at the dealer. Oh and the CEL code was i think po 2024, catalyst emmisions below threshold
Last edited by JMM8586 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Last edited by JMM8586 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Originally Posted by Thrawn
Originally Posted by JMM8586
they stated the intake caused a lean condition which burnt out my cat. how can i fight this, how is it not possible
This is ongoing as of right now, i havent paid for any work yet i left my car at the dealer. Oh and the CEL code was i think po 2024, catalyst emmisions below threshold
Last edited by JMM8586 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Last edited by JMM8586 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Good luck with this situation. Let me give you some insight on what you are up against. Modifying the Air intake volume has affects on the Air/Fuel ratio. What the dealer is saying is a possibility. If the air meter is receiving a signal that is out of range, then it can make the ECU guess the correct balance for air/fuel. This happened on my Kia and clogged my cat converter.
BUT... the toyota engine has triple redundancy monitoring also has a drive-by-wire system. First System is the Air Meter, 2nd System O2 Sensors, 3rd System is the engine management default programming. If 2 of those systems fail and you are having performance issues on default programming then damage can happen.
In your case, the intake on the tC engine isn't likely a cause of the problem. But, it is you versus the team who designed that engine. Second, that intake has not been tested and certified for use wit the tC engine. From that standpoint, they have every right to refuse warranty work.
If I recall correctly, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act requires that the dealer prove the aftermarket part caused the problem, not that you prove it didn't.
At the very least ask them to provide you their proof that the problem was caused by the aftermarket part in writing and within some reasonable time frame (72 hours?). Since they are allegedly denying your warranty claim because of this 'proof' they already have (right, uh-huh) that should not present a problem to them at all...
Keep in mind that IANAL and this is just what comes to my mind as a regular consumer, not as any sort of expert. Hopefully we have some more knowledgeable folks on hand here who can help.
Good luck!
At the very least ask them to provide you their proof that the problem was caused by the aftermarket part in writing and within some reasonable time frame (72 hours?). Since they are allegedly denying your warranty claim because of this 'proof' they already have (right, uh-huh) that should not present a problem to them at all...
Keep in mind that IANAL and this is just what comes to my mind as a regular consumer, not as any sort of expert. Hopefully we have some more knowledgeable folks on hand here who can help.
Good luck!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by duston831
wow.... $800 to repair? repair what? a new cat isnt over $200
Originally Posted by JMM8586
im calling to get the exact code now......p0420 bank 1 catlyist system below threshold
Originally Posted by Tomas
If I recall correctly, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act requires that the dealer prove the aftermarket part caused the problem, not that you prove it didn't.
At the very least ask them to provide you their proof that the problem was caused by the aftermarket part in writing and within some reasonable time frame (72 hours?). Since they are allegedly denying your warranty claim because of this 'proof' they already have (right, uh-huh) that should not present a problem to them at all...
Keep in mind that IANAL and this is just what comes to my mind as a regular consumer, not as any sort of expert. Hopefully we have some more knowledgeable folks on hand here who can help.
Good luck!
At the very least ask them to provide you their proof that the problem was caused by the aftermarket part in writing and within some reasonable time frame (72 hours?). Since they are allegedly denying your warranty claim because of this 'proof' they already have (right, uh-huh) that should not present a problem to them at all...
Keep in mind that IANAL and this is just what comes to my mind as a regular consumer, not as any sort of expert. Hopefully we have some more knowledgeable folks on hand here who can help.
Good luck!
I posted this same thing for another warranty issue also.
I do warranty for an auto supplier and this is pretty much the process. Your car has a problem and the dealer blames a part on the problem and replaces it. It may be your fault or not but its not their call. They return the faulty part to the OEM who sends it to the supplier that makes it. The supplier figures out the cause (you, adjoining part, your plant, oem assembly plant, dealer, etc.) and sends the test results, analysis and conclusion back to the OEM. They review the results and usually have a few questions involving proof of the cause. The dealer probably also has a similar process. The OEM will then go after the responsible party to cover the repair costs. About 80% of the parts have nothing wrong with them. Customer is probably least likely to be responsible in the end. My experience is with suspension so others may vary.
I do warranty for an auto supplier and this is pretty much the process. Your car has a problem and the dealer blames a part on the problem and replaces it. It may be your fault or not but its not their call. They return the faulty part to the OEM who sends it to the supplier that makes it. The supplier figures out the cause (you, adjoining part, your plant, oem assembly plant, dealer, etc.) and sends the test results, analysis and conclusion back to the OEM. They review the results and usually have a few questions involving proof of the cause. The dealer probably also has a similar process. The OEM will then go after the responsible party to cover the repair costs. About 80% of the parts have nothing wrong with them. Customer is probably least likely to be responsible in the end. My experience is with suspension so others may vary.
k well i just swallowed my pride and paid $104.40 to get my keys back. They told me to talk to the service manager tommorow. My Invoice States: CUSTOMER STATES CHECK ENGINE LIGHT IS ON PO420 CATALYSTCSYSTEM EFFICENCY LOW CAUSED BY AFTER MARKET INTAKE SYSTEM VOLUME OF AIR TO HIGH TO LEAN $756.00 TO INSTALL NEW CAT
Did they just prove that it was my intake?
Did they just prove that it was my intake?
k well i just swallowed my pride and paid $104.40 to get my keys back. They told me to talk to the service manager tommorow. My Invoice States: CUSTOMER STATES CHECK ENGINE LIGHT IS ON PO420 CATALYSTCSYSTEM EFFICENCY LOW CAUSED BY AFTER MARKET INTAKE SYSTEM VOLUME OF AIR TO HIGH TO LEAN $756.00 TO INSTALL NEW CAT
Did they just prove that it was my intake?
Did they just prove that it was my intake?






