Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Weapon R intake has voided my waranty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #1  
JMM8586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Default Weapon R intake has voided my waranty

I took my 05 tc 4/A with 21000 miles to gateway toyota in toms river, for a check engine light, i thought it may have to do someting with the exhaust and it did. The tech told me my intake caused my catalytic converter to burn out, and it would cost around $800 to repair. And to top that off they charged my $104 just to diagnose the problem with a OBD 2 scanner which is ridiculous. The dealership will not pay for and costs whatsoever. Is it really possible that my intake really caused my Cat to burn out?
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:23 PM
  #2  
Thrawn's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 268
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by JMM8586
Is it really possible that my intake really caused my Cat to burn out?
No, it's not. Refer them to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act, and tell them to get the regional manager involved or you'll take legal action.

Link - Detailed

Link - Simpler explanation
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
squirrel's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,770
From: 886motorwerx
Default

An intake WILL NOT Cause a cat to burn out.

They are taking the easy way out.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #4  
maximus96's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,227
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

fight it. keep us updated.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #5  
JMM8586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Default

they stated the intake caused a lean condition which burnt out my cat. how can i fight this, how can i prove the intake didnt cause the cat to burn out???? This is ongoing as of right now, i havent paid for any work yet i left my car at the dealer. Oh and the CEL code was i think po 2024, catalyst emmisions below threshold
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
duston831's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 479
From: New Ibiera, LA
Default

wow.... $800 to repair? repair what? a new cat isnt over $200
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #7  
Thrawn's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 268
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by JMM8586
they stated the intake caused a lean condition which burnt out my cat. how can i fight this, how is it not possible
Tell them to prove the lean condition. They'll need proof of this from the OEM narrowband A/F sensor, or they'll have to hook up a Lambda meter. They need to show that your A/F was significantly leaner than the A/F on a stock tC. Lean enough to burn out the cat (impossible). Tell them to show you the OBDII codes as well. They also cannot deny or approve a warranty claim outright, they have to contact certain regional reps and with proof that an aftermarket part caused the failure.

This is ongoing as of right now, i havent paid for any work yet i left my car at the dealer. Oh and the CEL code was i think po 2024, catalyst emmisions below threshold

Last edited by JMM8586 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Ok, so you got the code already, good. That code is far from proof of a lean condition, it proofs the cat is broke, lol. If the intake were the problem, and caused the a/f to lean out enough to burn the cat, Bank 1 Sensor 1 (the a/f sensor) would probably be throwing an error as well as Bank 1 Sensor 2 (the heated o2 sensor). And the second cat, the one in the exhaust piping, should have burnt out as well if the exhaust gas temperatures were that hot.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #8  
Dat_Dude's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 170
From: Riverview, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Thrawn
Originally Posted by JMM8586
they stated the intake caused a lean condition which burnt out my cat. how can i fight this, how is it not possible
Tell them to prove the lean condition. They'll need proof of this from the OEM narrowband A/F sensor, or they'll have to hook up a Lambda meter. They need to show that your A/F was significantly leaner than the A/F on a stock tC. Lean enough to burn out the cat (impossible). Tell them to show you the OBDII codes as well. They also cannot deny or approve a warranty claim outright, they have to contact certain regional reps and with proof that an aftermarket part caused the failure.

This is ongoing as of right now, i havent paid for any work yet i left my car at the dealer. Oh and the CEL code was i think po 2024, catalyst emmisions below threshold

Last edited by JMM8586 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Ok, so you got the code already, good. That code is far from proof of a lean condition, it proofs the cat is broke, lol. If the intake were the problem, and caused the a/f to lean out enough to burn the cat, Bank 1 Sensor 1 (the a/f sensor) would probably be throwing an error as well as Bank 1 Sensor 2 (the heated o2 sensor). And the second cat, the one in the exhaust piping, should have burnt out as well if the exhaust gas temperatures were that hot.
[/quote]

Good luck with this situation. Let me give you some insight on what you are up against. Modifying the Air intake volume has affects on the Air/Fuel ratio. What the dealer is saying is a possibility. If the air meter is receiving a signal that is out of range, then it can make the ECU guess the correct balance for air/fuel. This happened on my Kia and clogged my cat converter.

BUT... the toyota engine has triple redundancy monitoring also has a drive-by-wire system. First System is the Air Meter, 2nd System O2 Sensors, 3rd System is the engine management default programming. If 2 of those systems fail and you are having performance issues on default programming then damage can happen.

In your case, the intake on the tC engine isn't likely a cause of the problem. But, it is you versus the team who designed that engine. Second, that intake has not been tested and certified for use wit the tC engine. From that standpoint, they have every right to refuse warranty work.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #9  
JMM8586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Default

im calling to get the exact code now......p0420 bank 1 catlyist system below threshold
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #10  
JMM8586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Default

is there any hope i can fight this???
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #11  
DelayedTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 343
Default

Go after them, they scratched one of my stock wheels and I couldn't do anything about it...maybe you'll win. Gateway sucks, they need to be taken down.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #12  
matty-tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

lots of hope.

they can't prove your intake did it. and a catalytic converter can't cost $800 unless it's solid gold.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 10:34 PM
  #13  
Tomas's Avatar
Admin Emeritus

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,570
From: University Place, WA
Default

If I recall correctly, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act requires that the dealer prove the aftermarket part caused the problem, not that you prove it didn't.

At the very least ask them to provide you their proof that the problem was caused by the aftermarket part in writing and within some reasonable time frame (72 hours?). Since they are allegedly denying your warranty claim because of this 'proof' they already have (right, uh-huh) that should not present a problem to them at all...

Keep in mind that IANAL and this is just what comes to my mind as a regular consumer, not as any sort of expert. Hopefully we have some more knowledgeable folks on hand here who can help.

Good luck!
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 10:46 PM
  #14  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by duston831
wow.... $800 to repair? repair what? a new cat isnt over $200
Actually the converter for the scions is $800 because it is an entire exhaust system welded together. The converter, the resinator is one piece, and it is OBD2 California certified, all scions are california certified. So yeah the price is correct.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #15  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Try a different dealer next time too. Some dealers are clearly more interested in happy customers and others in more happy owners. They are also paid to replace things not trouble shoot things.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #16  
acasanova's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 615
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by JMM8586
im calling to get the exact code now......p0420 bank 1 catlyist system below threshold
First of all i got the exact same code after i installed the alphawerk header. Code PO420, simply precat is missing. In your case i dont know if you have a header, do you? A new cat like the guys here are pointing out is about $120 and that is a highflow unit. Try another dealer and if they give you a hard time follow the advice given to you by members. Make sure they explain the reason for not covering the part on paper (written).
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #17  
EVILDAVE's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
AlphaSquad

SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,771
From: Nor-Cal
Default

Originally Posted by Tomas
If I recall correctly, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act requires that the dealer prove the aftermarket part caused the problem, not that you prove it didn't.

At the very least ask them to provide you their proof that the problem was caused by the aftermarket part in writing and within some reasonable time frame (72 hours?). Since they are allegedly denying your warranty claim because of this 'proof' they already have (right, uh-huh) that should not present a problem to them at all...

Keep in mind that IANAL and this is just what comes to my mind as a regular consumer, not as any sort of expert. Hopefully we have some more knowledgeable folks on hand here who can help.

Good luck!
Tomas is correct they have to prove that was the cause of the problem in order to make that claim.
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 11:36 PM
  #18  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

I posted this same thing for another warranty issue also.
I do warranty for an auto supplier and this is pretty much the process. Your car has a problem and the dealer blames a part on the problem and replaces it. It may be your fault or not but its not their call. They return the faulty part to the OEM who sends it to the supplier that makes it. The supplier figures out the cause (you, adjoining part, your plant, oem assembly plant, dealer, etc.) and sends the test results, analysis and conclusion back to the OEM. They review the results and usually have a few questions involving proof of the cause. The dealer probably also has a similar process. The OEM will then go after the responsible party to cover the repair costs. About 80% of the parts have nothing wrong with them. Customer is probably least likely to be responsible in the end. My experience is with suspension so others may vary.
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 12:02 AM
  #19  
JMM8586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Default

k well i just swallowed my pride and paid $104.40 to get my keys back. They told me to talk to the service manager tommorow. My Invoice States: CUSTOMER STATES CHECK ENGINE LIGHT IS ON PO420 CATALYSTCSYSTEM EFFICENCY LOW CAUSED BY AFTER MARKET INTAKE SYSTEM VOLUME OF AIR TO HIGH TO LEAN $756.00 TO INSTALL NEW CAT
Did they just prove that it was my intake?
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 12:02 AM
  #20  
JMM8586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Default

k well i just swallowed my pride and paid $104.40 to get my keys back. They told me to talk to the service manager tommorow. My Invoice States: CUSTOMER STATES CHECK ENGINE LIGHT IS ON PO420 CATALYSTCSYSTEM EFFICENCY LOW CAUSED BY AFTER MARKET INTAKE SYSTEM VOLUME OF AIR TO HIGH TO LEAN $756.00 TO INSTALL NEW CAT
Did they just prove that it was my intake?



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.