Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Bigger Rims = Bad gas mileage??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 04:38 AM
  #1  
miraclecreator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 512
From: GA
Default Bigger Rims = Bad gas mileage??

I was told that bigger rims means bad mileage. How true is that and why is that? My last questions would be: What is the best size rims for tC, 18 or 19? Thanks
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 04:46 AM
  #2  
meepers's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

the larger the wheel, the larger the contact patch is with the ground. you are also increasing the rotating mass on the corners. it takes more to spin 60lbs of wheels then it does 30 lbs.. same with braking.. you will see less life from you brakes since it takes more force to stop 60lbs of spinning mass.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 04:48 AM
  #3  
miraclecreator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 512
From: GA
Default

Yikes.. r u saying that a 17" and 18" could mean a difference of 30lbs in weight?? that's quite a lot aint it?
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:37 AM
  #4  
Celt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 313
From: Arkansas
Default

My bro in law has a ram with a 12" lift and he gets 6mpg on 36" tires and 9 mpg on 32"tires.

So what have we learned today class?
THATS RIGHT MY BROTHER IN LAW IS AN IDIOT
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #5  
kungpaosamuraiii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,726
Default

30 and 60 were just examples.

Most sports rims are relatively light and weigh almost the same as the rims that are 1" smaller in diameter.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:08 AM
  #6  
rockbrawler884's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 430
From: Orland Park, IL
Default

I've heard that size does matter..... when it comes to gas mileage.

But as for the best size for the tC.... I have the stock 18s and ive seen 19s, they both look equally as good. 19s look hot with a 2in drop... but with if you hit a good size bumper, you'll have some rubbing.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:23 AM
  #7  
hahaitzskippy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,947
From: Irvine, CA
Default

HEAVIER CARS = WORSE GAS MILEAGE

no matter wat car. the heavier it is, the worse the gas mileage will be.

if you get bigger rims and they happen to be heavier, then your mileage will worsen
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 07:04 AM
  #8  
miraclecreator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 512
From: GA
Default

now here's a good question.. is the 18" enkei rims heavier than the stock ones or they're about the same?
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 08:18 AM
  #9  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

There's a lot of bad info on here, so I'm gonna try to straighten out some of it. . . I wish someone would make a sticky of it already. I hate reposting the same information, arguing about it, and then coming to the same conclusion.

Rotational Inertia: a wheels resistance to changes in speed (acceleration or deceleration). THe more inertia, the worse MPG, worse braking, worse HP.

I=MRR (that's M times (Rsquared))
As you can see, weight is not as important as radius. Inertia increases by the SQUARE or radius. Therefore, mass is the LEAST of your concerns.
a 5% increase in mass has a 5% increase in inertia. A 5% increase in size has the square's increase in inertia.

Thus reducing your wheel size by 5% is far more effective than lightening them by 5%, and in the real world, reducing the size decreases the weight as well.

SO
Increasing size will always hurt performance, in almost every regard. It takes a larger decrease in weight than %increase in size to offset the performance difference. So even if the bigger wheel is lighter, it is probably a worse performer.

REMEMBER
That this applies to wheels of equal width and overall diameter, and tires of equal traction. Of course, if you get wider tires, you will have more traction (if the width you already have does not match traction limit). When comparing performance, you need to compare tires of equal performance (not econo vs performance slicks)! More often than not, there are performance alternative tires of smaller diameters, with stiff sidewalls.

Just because you gain sidwall stiffness with larger diameters does not necessarily mean faster track times. In several independent tests, the ruled the opposite. Larger=slower. The offset in traction did not offset the loss in acceleration and braking.

If handling G's are your goal, than stiffer sidewalls are critical, however. And styling, of course! But remember that you pay a price in MPG, HP, and braking.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #10  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

I don't see what the big deal is. You more than likely are not going to even NOTICE a change in your MPG. You have to take into account that with your stock wheels, the sidewall height of the tire is larger than on a larger rim. If you were to sit both tires side by side, you will probably notice that the OVERALL height of the tire+rim is about nearly the same. Stock = Smaller wheel and thicker tire. Aftermarket = Larger Wheel (perhaps lighter in some cases) and skinner tire. If you want to Track it up all the time, then you probably will benefit from a smaller wheel thicker tire setup better. But If you are looking for asthetic value, then I say go with 18's or 19's (19's seem to be the formula for the TC IMO). By your question, it dosen't seem you are looking for the best Performace, but are more concerned with your gas. Dude, seriously, you probably won't even think of MPG, because you will be to busy looking at how good your TC looks drop on a set of 19's.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #11  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
I don't see what the big deal is. You more than likely are not going to even NOTICE a change in your MPG. You have to take into account that with your stock wheels, the sidewall height of the tire is larger than on a larger rim. If you were to sit both tires side by side, you will probably notice that the OVERALL height of the tire+rim is about nearly the same. Stock = Smaller wheel and thicker tire. Aftermarket = Larger Wheel (perhaps lighter in some cases) and skinner tire. If you want to Track it up all the time, then you probably will benefit from a smaller wheel thicker tire setup better. But If you are looking for asthetic value, then I say go with 18's or 19's (19's seem to be the formula for the TC IMO). By your question, it dosen't seem you are looking for the best Performace, but are more concerned with your gas. Dude, seriously, you probably won't even think of MPG, because you will be to busy looking at how good your TC looks drop on a set of 19's.
Most of us making a big deal are just answering his question. But as I previously stated, larger rims are for aesthetic value. You will lose a substantial amount of power and MPG. Just try racing two identical cars, one with 19's and one with 17's. It's been done time and time again with different cars (this doesn't count ricer boys who flat with lame cameras). Aesthetically, larger rims can look really good. . . And then there's always super dub 28" spinning rims. It's all personal taste, but it's best that people know what they are getting into before they make a large purchase.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 04:06 PM
  #12  
meepers's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Most of us making a big deal are just answering his question. But as I previously stated, larger rims are for aesthetic value. You will lose a substantial amount of power and MPG

Thank ya.. I wasnt trying to get into the whole physics of larger wheels/moving the rotating mass away from the center of the hub/blah blah.. just a quick yes answer. djct knows whats up. just do some websearches.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 04:08 PM
  #13  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by djct_watt
Most of us making a big deal are just answering his question. But as I previously stated, larger rims are for aesthetic value. You will lose a substantial amount of power and MPG. Just try racing two identical cars, one with 19's and one with 17's. It's been done time and time again with different cars (this doesn't count ricer boys who flat with lame cameras). Aesthetically, larger rims can look really good. . . And then there's always super dub 28" spinning rims. It's all personal taste, but it's best that people know what they are getting into before they make a large purchase.

I will just offset the "power loss" by installing a ZPI turbo...lol. And MPG...well, aftermarket = loss of MPG.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #14  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

actually, lighter 17" rims and a drop will increase your MPG. . .

but kudos for the ZPI turbo. . . when you run that thing on the track, switch back to your stockies or some lighter performance rims. I bet it'll be one clean car.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #15  
87na's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by djct_watt
There's a lot of bad info on here, so I'm gonna try to straighten out some of it. . . I wish someone would make a sticky of it already. I hate reposting the same information, arguing about it, and then coming to the same conclusion.

Rotational Inertia: a wheels resistance to changes in speed (acceleration or deceleration). THe more inertia, the worse MPG, worse braking, worse HP.

I=MRR (that's M times (Rsquared))
As you can see, weight is not as important as radius. Inertia increases by the SQUARE or radius. Therefore, mass is the LEAST of your concerns.
a 5% increase in mass has a 5% increase in inertia. A 5% increase in size has the square's increase in inertia.

Thus reducing your wheel size by 5% is far more effective than lightening them by 5%, and in the real world, reducing the size decreases the weight as well.

SO
Increasing size will always hurt performance, in almost every regard. It takes a larger decrease in weight than %increase in size to offset the performance difference. So even if the bigger wheel is lighter, it is probably a worse performer.

REMEMBER
That this applies to wheels of equal width and overall diameter, and tires of equal traction. Of course, if you get wider tires, you will have more traction (if the width you already have does not match traction limit). When comparing performance, you need to compare tires of equal performance (not econo vs performance slicks)! More often than not, there are performance alternative tires of smaller diameters, with stiff sidewalls.

Just because you gain sidwall stiffness with larger diameters does not necessarily mean faster track times. In several independent tests, the ruled the opposite. Larger=slower. The offset in traction did not offset the loss in acceleration and braking.

If handling G's are your goal, than stiffer sidewalls are critical, however. And styling, of course! But remember that you pay a price in MPG, HP, and braking.

Nice post bro. That is all I will say as a reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #16  
OuterHeaven's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 627
From: Plano, TX
Default

He is right about the rotational iniertia. When anyone increases the actual metal rim bigger, the increase in inertia is squared like he said. Even if the tires are the same size as the previous tires, they do not weigh as much as the actual metal rim. Even if the rim is slightly lighter the rotational inertia will probably still be increased. Anyways this brings me to the point that most race cars use the smallest diameter wheels that fit there brakes for a reason. So there will be an effect on gas milage. also for the best sized rims depends on what you want to do. If you like the looks of bigger rims then 19's are in order but for gas milage the best would be a 15 inch rims (if you can fit it) with a low rolling resistance tire. And for performance a 15 inch rim again with a racing tire is in order but for a street tire i would probably stick with the stock rims and better tires. anyways my 2 cents.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #17  
unlimited77's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 606
From: Rolla, MO
Default

just get turbo and you wont have to matter about such little wieght gains
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #18  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

A big part of the problem (especially with the xA and xB) are the tiny little engines. If you have a big, powerful V-8 and you upsize the wheels, you will never notice the drop in power or gas milage. But when you only have a little 108 HP 4 cylinder, it doesn't take much to notice a change. If you slap a set of heavy 19" chrome wheels on a xB, you are going to get crappy milage and have no power....but you'll look good.
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #19  
TheScionicMan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,736
From: In the Hot Tub
Default

Don't forget about unsprung weight. Those heavy wheels will have a detrimental effect on handling as well...
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 08:36 PM
  #20  
falcon9094's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 324
From: Team Dreunk
Default

I have 19's and got 28mpg over 1000 miles at 80+ mph and with the stocks I would get similar numbers



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM.