View Full Version : Best and Worst in reliability 2005


SilverRSXJezus
11-16-2005, 01:06 AM
http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.aspx?contentid=4023544


Japanese imports earned most of the top reliability honors, while European models scored well below average in this Consumer Reports study.

Our 2005 reliability survey, the largest of its kind, reached a milestone this year—we've gathered responses on more than 1 million vehicles from Consumer Reports and ConsumerReports.org subscribers, the most we've ever received. These results underpin the most comprehensive reliability data you will find anywhere. Here, we give you a first look at our new Predicted Reliability Ratings for new cars, based on this survey, and the models that we expect to be the most and least reliable.
The difference between the best and the worst models is striking. For example, among large SUVs the least reliable model, the Infiniti QX56, is likely to have about eight times as many problems as the most reliable model, the Toyota Land Cruiser.

See Best and worst for a list of the models that have earned the best and worst Predicted Reliability Ratings in various vehicle categories. Following are some of the more notable survey findings:


Of the 31 cars that earned top rating, 29 were Japanese. Of these, 15 were from Toyota and its Lexus division and eight were from Honda. Some redesigned or new Japanese models from Toyota and Honda, however suffered "first-year blues." The new Scion tC and the redesigned 2005 Acura RL, Toyota Avalon, and Honda Odyssey earned only average reliability scores, for example.

Of the 48 cars that earned the lowest rating, 22 carry American nameplates, 20 are European, 4 are from Japan (all from Nissan and its Infiniti division), and 2 are from South Korea.

Some European models, which have had poor reliability in our previous surveys, improved slightly. The six-cylinder BMW X5 and X3, for example, earned average Ratings and are now the first European SUVs reliable enough to be recommended. However, most European models still scored far below average.

Hybrids from both domestic and Japanese manufacturers continue to have above-average reliability, including the Honda Accord and Civic Hybrids, the Toyota Prius, and the Lexus RX400h, which received top scores.



more info in the link...

*edit* Fixed your link - Max

DarkNick
11-16-2005, 01:35 AM
The link doesnt work.
edit-Ok, it got fixed

edxa
11-16-2005, 06:11 AM
Link worked for me.

Anyone know how the xA and the xB faired in the reliability ratings?

taek
11-16-2005, 06:51 AM
aww crap i own a nissan armada =[

-taek

neotim
11-16-2005, 01:50 PM
Anyone know how the xA and the xB faired in the reliability ratings?

Considering our cars are redesigned Echo's, I'm sure the xA & xB will do very well...

roketsciontist
11-16-2005, 03:27 PM
Scion xB is a recommended model with very good predicted reliability, excellent owner satisfaction, very good accident avoidance, very good fuel economy, fair acceleration, poor ride, very good front seat comfort with very good used car verdicts for both 2004 and 2005 (Paint and Body Integrity were marked weak spots).

I don't want to even paraphrase any more of the article at risk of breaking their privacy policy.

dante
11-16-2005, 11:24 PM
aww crap i own a nissan armada =[

-taek

(I wouldn't admit that too often if I were you... :rofl: )

rallyxb
11-17-2005, 03:13 AM
. . .
:devilbat:
My 2005 Scion xB (Phil's LunchBox) has less hP than my Motorcycle! :cheers: It's a Toyota. It cost 1/3 of what your truck cost. The interior was designed by Lexus and It has more passenger room than the Volvo S60. Best of all..it gets 34 MPG. I think inside the box!
MEISKEIT :funnypost . . .

And my 2004 xB has a whopping 18 more HP than my old 92 Subaru Loyale, Woo Hoo!! I like your quote... very similar to what I told my buddy who owns the Volvo S60.
:lol: