Rotation every 5k miles?
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 128
From: Lowell, MA
yeah you should def rotate them. My car starts to pull to the left after a few thousand miles, then i rotate and make sure the correct air pressure is in the tires. You'll def notice a smoother ride
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 487
From: ee-arth
i was debating NOT rotating mine so the fronts wear down and then i change the awful RE92's out for something that won't get me sideways in a ditch if it drizzles and use one of the rears for a full size spare. well i decided just to wear them evenly and put off the tire purchase...they don't last very long (even when rotated) anyway.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 371
actually im not surprised about tread wear with the factory tires.. the RE92's (tirerack has the factory size as 215-45-17) have a tread wear of 160 if im not mistaken (again going by tirerack)... pretty low number (or better said ,pretty high wear).. and with spirited driving i can understand how they not lasting.....
however.. this does suprise me alittle since everyone complains of how bad they are.... with such a low treadwear number i would think they would stick pretty well.... im not talking their anti-hydroplaning ability.. im talking grip.. i would think that for "STREET" driving they would be pretty good though... but i can't judge the tires personally since i got my tc off the lot with 19's....
with that high of wear.. rotation is defenetly recommended... and as someone posted above... do it yourself... paying a dealer to rotate your tires is like burning money...
however.. this does suprise me alittle since everyone complains of how bad they are.... with such a low treadwear number i would think they would stick pretty well.... im not talking their anti-hydroplaning ability.. im talking grip.. i would think that for "STREET" driving they would be pretty good though... but i can't judge the tires personally since i got my tc off the lot with 19's....
with that high of wear.. rotation is defenetly recommended... and as someone posted above... do it yourself... paying a dealer to rotate your tires is like burning money...
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 128
From: Lowell, MA
Originally Posted by GetCaughtDead
for the sake of the conversation, does anybody happen to know just how much the dealership charges to rotate tires?
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 181
Originally Posted by Tomas
That tire wear index of 160 is from the tire manufacturer as required by the feds, not something made up by tirerack. Very wear-prone tires!
When looking at UTQG ratings it is important to realize that the Department of Transportation does not conduct the tests. The grades are assigned by the tire manufacturers based on their test results or those conducted by an independent testing company they have hired. The NHTSA has the right to inspect the tire manufacturer's data and can fine them if inconsistencies are found. While most new tire lines have their grades established when they are introduced, they are allowed a 6-month grace period to allow the tire manufacturer to test actual production tires. Once a grade is assigned it must be branded on the tire's upper sidewall and printed on its label.
Unfortunately, the rating that is of the most interest to consumers is the one that appears to be the least consistent. While the Treadwear Grade was originally intended to be assigned purely scientifically, it has also become a marketing tool used by manufacturers to help position and promote their tires.
Unfortunately, the rating that is of the most interest to consumers is the one that appears to be the least consistent. While the Treadwear Grade was originally intended to be assigned purely scientifically, it has also become a marketing tool used by manufacturers to help position and promote their tires.
Cliff notes, you really can't use the number to comapare tires from different manufactures. The testing isn't standardized or run by in independent agency.
Paul G.
Admin Emeritus
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,570
From: University Place, WA
Correct, Paul. While the feds require the number, and provide a detailed guide on how the testing is supposed to be done, they have little control over the actual testing.
Thing is, if a manufacturer who makes tires they rate in the eight hundreds, rates one of their tires only a 160, it's a pretty sad tire... Either it sticks like glue or it is just too soft a tread, and wears off like a rubber eraser.
Heck, if the rate it only a 160, that number is probably as high as they could possibly stretch the truth. :D
Thing is, if a manufacturer who makes tires they rate in the eight hundreds, rates one of their tires only a 160, it's a pretty sad tire... Either it sticks like glue or it is just too soft a tread, and wears off like a rubber eraser.
Heck, if the rate it only a 160, that number is probably as high as they could possibly stretch the truth. :D
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 487
From: ee-arth
Originally Posted by Petem
actually im not surprised about tread wear with the factory tires.. the RE92's (tirerack has the factory size as 215-45-17) have a tread wear of 160 if im not mistaken (again going by tirerack)...this does suprise me alittle since everyone complains of how bad they are.... with such a low treadwear number i would think they would stick pretty well.... im not talking their anti-hydroplaning ability.. im talking grip.. i would think that for "STREET" driving they would be pretty good though...