Notices
Scion tC 1G Suspension & Handling Coilovers, Shocks, Airbags, Swaybars...

Best way to shorten Braking distance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #1  
krolla's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 42
Default Best way to shorten Braking distance

I've driven several real "performace" cars M3, S4 etc.. after getting back into my tC is when I realize that our brakes SUCK..

I just replace the stock Potenzas with Hankook Ventus HRII (same size). I know these are not "top of the line", but I expected some improvement in stopping distance under hard braking (ABS grinding hard). I do test this in evey car I own on an empty road, just to learn how the car behaves in an emergency.

Last week I was cut-off by another driver and I broke hard (ABS engaged) and hit her.. It caused me to wonder if I had better brakes, would I have been able to stop sooner?

I think back to doing the same braking in the M3 aned S4, both cars stop HARD, throwing passangers forward with little hint of ABS, ours just seems to slide with ABS grinding away the whole time..

I am considering upgrading to braided hoses, cross drilled (stock sized for now) and sport pads, in an inexpensive effort to improve/shorten braking distance..

... the more I think about it, It makes me wonder... the stock brakes (calipers, pads & rotors) are providing enough force for the wheel to attempt to lockup, this causing the ABS to intervine, so how much would I really gain by improving these areas? (Brake fade, Track use aside)

When I think of it that way, I'm almost leaning toward buying stickier, wider tires and maybe bumping up to 18" rims FIRST in an effort to improve grip...

Any thoughts...?
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #2  
NiKo's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 51
From: nor cal
Default

if you use a wider tire it should help but also the suspension would make a difference i would say going with like a 225 minimum like a 225/45zr17 with ceramic pads
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #3  
Woody6799's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 296
From: Jersey
Default

you could also do a big brake kit but i def do recommend suspension work and a wider tire
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 11:04 PM
  #4  
yellot00tr's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 902
From: Long Island
Default

get some hawk hps pads. they dust alot, but they're a huge improvement over stock. after that, get some better tires. i'm trying to figure out what tires to get right now as well. at this point, i'm down to either the toyo proxes t1r, or the p-nero system's, both at 225-40-18. not sure if i could get away with a 235, i gotta check to see if anyone's done it, and what they had to do to make it fit. i'm not looking to roll fenders, etc etc.
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #5  
DuMa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,616
From: Orange County, CA
Default

lighten the weight.
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #6  
sravage's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4
From: NE Massachusetts
Default

I run Hawk HP-Plus up front and they are great. Granted they do squeal a bit, and do dust more than stock but they are a fantastic pad. Any real performance pad will squeal and dust anyway, except EBC Red Stuff. The Hawks use a non-corrosive formula so the dust wont eat the finish on your wheels. I also did steel braided brake lines. I run the car on a road course and it's perfect. Cross drilled rotors would only make a diffrence if you do a LOT (as in auto cross or track) of heavy braking. I'll assume you don'y go around slamming on the brakes every time you want to stop. As for tires, the ABS is gonna pulse to prevent the tire from sliding. You want a different compound for latteral grip in corners, not really for inline grip. The tire guru's design the tread pattern for grip in cornering not really in stoping. Will it help? Yes, but not a ton, unless of course your gonna run huge Nito's up front. As for wheels, stay light. Adding more un-sprung weight will only make the brakes work harder. If you go huge on the wheel then I'd consider the BBK. Hope this helsp a bit.

But your right.... The stock brakes suck!
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 11:47 PM
  #7  
HKSpeed's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,407
From: Los Angeles County 909
Default Re: Best way to shorten Braking distance

Originally Posted by krolla
I've driven several real "performace" cars M3, S4 etc.. after getting back into my tC is when I realize that our brakes SUCK.
i bet alot of other things about the tC suck after driving those cars...basically everything.

The base M3 and S4 have 13" slotted or drilled rotors, ceramic pads, steel braided lines, 4 piston front/2 piston rear calipers, larger master cylinder, and electronic stability control/brake assist. Get such hardware and you'll brake like them in no time.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #8  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

The tC has EBD "I think it was" braking which automatically sends braking power to the front or rear, depending on traction. So for street use, just getting a OEM sized slotted/crossdrilled rotor would be the best bet. If your going to do any kind of track racing, go with a BBK.

But to answer your question, stickier tires is whats going to yield shorter stopping distances.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 12:55 AM
  #9  
goingcarcrazy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 337
Default

my guess is a combo of everything. stiffer suspension, better pads, better rotors, and better tires. I know for some (especially after a crash) money's kinda tight, so prolly the single biggest help may be better tires.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #10  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

In this order:

1. Tires
2. Tires
3. Tires
4. Weight
5. Suspension
6. Brake force distribution set up (front/rear)

Notice that calipers/pads do not enter into the equation. The only reason to upgrade the brakes is if you are having fade problems.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 02:23 AM
  #11  
goingcarcrazy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by io333
In this order:

1. Tires
2. Tires
3. Tires
4. Weight
5. Suspension
6. Brake force distribution set up (front/rear)

Notice that calipers/pads do not enter into the equation. The only reason to upgrade the brakes is if you are having fade problems.
So you're saying that all the brakes on an Audi R8 or Porsche 911 GT3 has over the brakes on our cars is less brake fade? I don't think so. Calipers, pads, and new rotors will shorted stopping distance, but yes, my friend has an RSX, he got Falken 512 tires and Axis ultimate break pads and when he did a 40-0 test on his car, it cut his distance by about a quarter of what it was (hypothetically 100ft previously, 75 ft now), so yes, on our tC's, knowing the tires, that would be the best for the money.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 05:12 AM
  #12  
BuddhasTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,003
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

cars like the M3 have bigger rotors and better brake systems such as brembo brakes or wilwood (not exact brands just equivalents). All stock brakes on cheaper compact cars (such as ours) SUCK!!! If you want better brakes, you gotta buy big brake kits
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 05:32 AM
  #13  
FLINT's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,168
From: MD
Default

INGALLS break lines!!!!
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #14  
Somnambulated's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,787
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

I agree it's time to upgrade your pads and rotors, but suspension does help noticably.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #15  
TheQuietThings's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,920
From: Staten Island, NY
Default

I love how tC's are compared to performance vehicles from Germany.

What do you think is going to brake better? Huge german brakes, or street rotors?

Of course the $60,000 car is going to brake better. Compare the tC's braking to a Civic, or a Cobalt or something, and you will feel 10X more safe in a tC.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 08:41 AM
  #16  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

Originally Posted by io333
In this order:

1. Tires
2. Tires
3. Tires
4. Weight
5. Suspension
6. Brake force distribution set up (front/rear)

Notice that calipers/pads do not enter into the equation. The only reason to upgrade the brakes is if you are having fade problems.
tC already has a Brake Distribution system, don't mess with it. The only reason you should have to manually mess with it is if your car doesnt have a Ditribution system already. There was a mag that did a test on a BBK for the tC and found out the hard way that it already has a system in place.
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #17  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

Originally Posted by goingcarcrazy
So you're saying that all the brakes on an Audi R8 or Porsche 911 GT3 has over the brakes on our cars is less brake fade?
Yes.

Originally Posted by goingcarcrazy
I don't think so.
whatever
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #18  
racecaryaya's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 109
From: SePA
Default

First of all, tires are the biggest factor in stopping distance. Period. I bet the M3 and S4 had larger, wider and stickier tires than the tC. Are you confusing actual stopping distace with pedal feel? Because the tC's pedal feels horrible compared to most other cars I've driven and that may be why you think the stopping distance is that much worse. You can remedy that by using Motul Super Blue (DOT4) brake fluid and putting stainless steel lines on all foue corners.

Secondly, slotted or cross-drilled rotors will do absolutely nothing for your braking distance.

Finally, the braking distance for the tC isn't really that bad compared to other cars in its class (it's better than the Civic Si and Mazda 3 right out of the box).
Originally Posted by SportCompactcar.com
The tC's braking performance was decent...The four-wheel discs hauled our tC down from 60 mph in 127 feet, and from 70 mph in 174
Originally Posted by Edmund's Inside Line
2006 Honda Ciivic Si
60 - 0 (ft): 128.7
Braking Rating: Average

Additionally: sravage, how the hell can you daily drive on HP+s?! I only put them on for Autox and track days then promptly remove them again (the whole process takes less than 30 minutes to swap pads). The wear on the rotors alone makes it worth running the stock compound pads![/quote]
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 06:47 PM
  #19  
melvynray's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 638
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Default

i changed rotors and pads. it brakes Worse than stock..... any ideas.. its driving me crazy!
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #20  
racecaryaya's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 109
From: SePA
Default

Originally Posted by melvynray
i changed rotors and pads. it brakes Worse than stock..... any ideas.. its driving me crazy!
Did you bleed the brake lines after changing the parts? If not—or even if so—bleed the lines and see how the brakes feel then.



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.