Old_Punk
08-17-2004, 01:45 AM
I've seen several photos of xB show cars with radical positive camber (tops of the tires tilt in, bottoms tilt out). That's a pretty good trick considering the stock rear suspension. Are these guys torching the trailing arms or something?
It looks kind of silly anyway.
KevinxB
08-17-2004, 02:05 AM
The top of the tire leaning in toward the vehicle is negative camber. Positive is the other way around.
Old_Punk
08-17-2004, 11:51 AM
Ah, here's the source of my mistake:
http://www.ozebiz.com.au/racetech/theory/align.html
The captions on the camber diagrams are correct but the pictures aren't.
But anyway, why the camber on xB/bB show cars? Is it just to look like radical racers? Is it to fit the tops of the wheels into the fenders?
the_saint
08-17-2004, 12:53 PM
But anyway, why the camber on xB/bB show cars? Is it just to look like radical racers? Is it to fit the tops of the wheels into the fenders?
I think it's a little of both. As far as how they getthem like that, they have spacer/shims like the One Ton Garage ones only they are angled.
http://onetongarage.com/products/rear_spacer_shim/index.html
George
08-17-2004, 05:41 PM
For a radical show car, modifying the rear beam isn't all that much!
Totally useless for the street, though, unless you like wearing out tires really fast!
George
mill0048
08-21-2004, 01:51 PM
Don't 'bagged cars get monsterous negative camber at the lowest setting? I just thought the Japanese liked the air suspension on 'em. :? Personally, I'm not a fan of the 'gobs-of-negative-camber' look.
SWF_05_tC
08-22-2004, 08:18 AM
Don't 'bagged cars get monsterous negative camber at the lowest setting? I just thought the Japanese liked the air suspension on 'em. :? Personally, I'm not a fan of the 'gobs-of-negative-camber' look.
Same here, it kinda of makes it look like "gobs-of-what-the-hell-did-you-do-to-your-car??" but to each his own.