torque of horsepower? which do you prefer?
of course, you can't have one with the other. but, when it comes to modding your car, what are you aiming for? i personally favor the low-end torque kick, granted of a few ponies to the ground as with a downpipe + full catback. the CAI is also ruled out because of this reason. i would've also opted for a 4-2-1 header, but the emission ****'s here in california does not approve of such.
i've read countless posts about the 'best' I/H/E combo and the potential of bolt-on's and what not, but looking at the dyno's, the low-end power is almost non-existent and you only have about a 2.5 ~ 3K rpm range to acutally enjoy the throttle. i mean, the car could only go so fast, and when you're already doing 70+mph, there's no point. but hey, to each their own.
i've read countless posts about the 'best' I/H/E combo and the potential of bolt-on's and what not, but looking at the dyno's, the low-end power is almost non-existent and you only have about a 2.5 ~ 3K rpm range to acutally enjoy the throttle. i mean, the car could only go so fast, and when you're already doing 70+mph, there's no point. but hey, to each their own.
Originally Posted by trust
of course, you can't have one with the other. but, when it comes to modding your car, what are you aiming for? i personally favor the low-end torque kick, granted of a few ponies to the ground as with a downpipe + full catback. the CAI is also ruled out because of this reason. i would've also opted for a 4-2-1 header, but the emission ****'s here in california does not approve of such.
i've read countless posts about the 'best' I/H/E combo and the potential of bolt-on's and what not, but looking at the dyno's, the low-end power is almost non-existent and you only have about a 2.5 ~ 3K rpm range to acutally enjoy the throttle. i mean, the car could only go so fast, and when you're already doing 70+mph, there's no point. but hey, to each their own.
i've read countless posts about the 'best' I/H/E combo and the potential of bolt-on's and what not, but looking at the dyno's, the low-end power is almost non-existent and you only have about a 2.5 ~ 3K rpm range to acutally enjoy the throttle. i mean, the car could only go so fast, and when you're already doing 70+mph, there's no point. but hey, to each their own.
Originally Posted by Ty_Max
Who needs seats anyways just get rid of all your seats even the front ones and squat when you drive...ultimate weight reduction
Originally Posted by Ty_Max
Who needs seats anyways just get rid of all your seats even the front ones and squat when you drive...ultimate weight reduction
I prefer a balance of horespower an torque. I know this is somewhat of a cliche answer, but I look at it this way. Torque gets you moving, and horsepower keeps you moving. Without one, your car would have great starts, but horrible finishes, and vice versa. Take for example the Hondas and Acuras. Their motors are all horsepower and no torque. Including the celica gts, 180hp, 125tq, same torque the corolla has. Now, depending on what you want to do, autox or drags, it becomes much different. Autox is great for torque-built cars, drags more of a balance, maybe higher horsepower numbers then tq.
Originally Posted by trust
also, about the weight reduction, what people overlook the most is their clothes. seriously, the clothes you wear is about 20 pounds. that's about 5 horsepower. i prefer to race while naked, this way, i get that swift breeze caress my ***** when going 150 mph.
Welcome to SL
Originally Posted by Ty_Max
Originally Posted by trust
also, about the weight reduction, what people overlook the most is their clothes. seriously, the clothes you wear is about 20 pounds. that's about 5 horsepower. i prefer to race while naked, this way, i get that swift breeze caress my ***** when going 150 mph.
Welcome to SL

Originally Posted by jjos1
I remember hearing some where "Horse power sells parts but torque wins races" um yeah
Personally, if I only cared about staying below 4K RPM 98% of the time, then torque is all I would want! And then there is gearing to consider too. My past 2 cars where Honda's and I found a lot of joy being able to drive around the 7K RPM mark even if they were slower than the tC on the straights.
And there are cars that have a healthy balance of both! Nissan 350Z, Corvette Z06, BMW 330i........ I'm sure there are more.
Originally Posted by jjos1
I remember hearing some where "Horse power sells parts but torque wins races" um yeah
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...20bc543951.htm
To keep torque us a short Ram, 4-2-1 and a 2.25 inch Exhaust, all the way with a High Flow Cat and a Good resonator. That's my torque list at least, but not the best upper power to go too.
With an N/A 4-banger, you should just modify for engine sound and throttle response. You're not going to get nearly the gains you would see with a V8 or factory-boosted. People "OoooOO" and "AAAaah!" at a 300-hp scion tc... but would crying and be asking for a refund if their LS1 made that.
With that being said-
**If you're truly focused on all-out, straight-line racing.... then horsepower should be your focus.
**If you're focused on track or autocross, then you want a balanced increase of torque and power. Focus on RESPONSE. You don't need to accelerate astoundingly well if you grip and can reduce your time on the brakes.
**If you're just going to drive it from A-B and want a little more kick, then work on low-end. Most non-serious tuners fall into this category. I like being able to pass slow-moving cars without dropping a gear.
and of course... since there will always be someone _____ing about it...
Weight reduction is by far the best thing you can do, if you can live without the comforts. Better acceleration, Better braking, Better turning, Better gas mileage, the list goes on and on. ... It's just that you need to decide if you want to give up these comforts day-to-day... and eventually, you wont.
With that being said-
**If you're truly focused on all-out, straight-line racing.... then horsepower should be your focus.
**If you're focused on track or autocross, then you want a balanced increase of torque and power. Focus on RESPONSE. You don't need to accelerate astoundingly well if you grip and can reduce your time on the brakes.
**If you're just going to drive it from A-B and want a little more kick, then work on low-end. Most non-serious tuners fall into this category. I like being able to pass slow-moving cars without dropping a gear.
and of course... since there will always be someone _____ing about it...
Weight reduction is by far the best thing you can do, if you can live without the comforts. Better acceleration, Better braking, Better turning, Better gas mileage, the list goes on and on. ... It's just that you need to decide if you want to give up these comforts day-to-day... and eventually, you wont.
I'm going to have to deviate from the norm here. I had too much fun driving my Turbo eg civic. Now while that had more torque than the stock motor, it was more of a horsepower motor. It really shined in the higher rpms (4,500 - 7,200). Most cases I would fall behind in a race from the start, but in second gear (runs up to 60mph) I was almost always ahead. Something about coming from behind to make the pass right before the finish line just tickles my junk. ya know?
Is the 4-1 header (the horsepower one. haha) really that much different from the 4-2-1 (the torquey one).?
I say screw em' both and get a downpipe for the turbo you're putting on!
Is the 4-1 header (the horsepower one. haha) really that much different from the 4-2-1 (the torquey one).?
I say screw em' both and get a downpipe for the turbo you're putting on!







