Notices
Scion FR-S Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Got 2jz?

Old 07-18-2012, 01:20 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default Got 2jz?

This is GT86/FR-S #2 with a 2jz.

Hmmm...




rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 01:57 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
dropzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,878
Default

Where's the NOS? In for vids of this on the road.
dropzone is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 02:07 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
TeeCizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lurking Inside Your Garage!
Posts: 7,862
Default

Fugly-**** Exterior though....Yuck.

The 2JZ Swap is awesome!
TeeCizzle is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 02:11 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

^+1 on that. Not a fan of that body work. Fredric Aasbo's 2jz swapped one looks much better with the 6666 body kit.
rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 02:30 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
emrules2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 603
Default

Kinda sucks to see a motor swap already when we don't even really know the potential of the stock motor
emrules2001 is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 03:19 AM
  #6  
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,082
Default

It should have had a straight 6 from the factory.
Jon is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 10:57 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 07-19-2012, 12:17 AM
  #8  
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
EvilMonkey07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 54
Default

What happened with all the talk about being balanced? Now adding at least 350 lbs to the front of that car is cool? lold.
EvilMonkey07 is offline  
Old 07-19-2012, 01:54 AM
  #9  
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,082
Default

Originally Posted by EvilMonkey07
What happened with all the talk about being balanced? Now adding at least 350 lbs to the front of that car is cool? lold.
They didn't do it for balance. They did it because the engine is tried and true, no R&D to be done, and makes power easily. Not a hard concept to grasp.
Jon is offline  
Old 07-19-2012, 07:36 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
dropzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,878
Default

If you want to keep with balance, mod the stock engine, or swap in another boxer engine then. I think the power output with this should make up for any balance concerns lol.
dropzone is offline  
Old 07-19-2012, 10:07 AM
  #11  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

it'll still run 13's in the quarter mile
jct is offline  
Old 07-19-2012, 05:17 PM
  #12  
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,082
Default

Aasbø Drift

Jon is offline  
Old 07-19-2012, 06:08 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default

Like a Boss!
rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 07-20-2012, 12:29 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 16,747
Default




Got Camber?

rhythmnsmoke is offline  
Old 07-20-2012, 07:28 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
dropzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central TX
Posts: 2,878
Default

Lol at the Mexi-poke, probably the first I've seen making it functional.
dropzone is offline  
Old 07-20-2012, 06:04 PM
  #16  
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
GenomeTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 69
Default

this was bound to happen lol. looks clean but I still want to see how much we can squeeze out of the stock engine
GenomeTuning is offline  
Old 07-20-2012, 07:14 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
mauriceproductions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Manassas VA, Neer Ptuning
Posts: 184
Default

looks sweet,I Want a 2JZ swap now, And I agree with Jon should have been a 6 from the factory, but this is a scion (inexpensive spots car)
mauriceproductions is offline  
Old 07-20-2012, 08:18 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
mixD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Little Elm, TX/Lake Havasu City, AZ
Posts: 153
Default

yeah once i get into an fr-s, hopefully soon, i would roll the stock motor for a while but once its paid off 2JZ for the win one of the guys in an old car group back home had a supra with the 2JZ and it was one of the most amazing engines i have seem to this day
mixD is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 03:07 AM
  #19  
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
tha_insane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 81
Default

It's so cool tuners are going back to the 2jz again but as some of us know thats a cast iron block so how much weight does that add to the car? Why not use 2UR from the IS-F? They probably are about the same weight being that the 2UR is aluminum and great torque and horsepower stock. I know someone will come in with the 2UR isn't tunable but let's not forget the 2jz wasn't supposed to be either. Someone need to give those V8s a go.
tha_insane is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 01:24 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
mauriceproductions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Manassas VA, Neer Ptuning
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by tha_insane
It's so cool tuners are going back to the 2jz again but as some of us know thats a cast iron block so how much weight does that add to the car? Why not use 2UR from the IS-F? They probably are about the same weight being that the 2UR is aluminum and great torque and horsepower stock. I know someone will come in with the 2UR isn't tunable but let's not forget the 2jz wasn't supposed to be either. Someone need to give those V8s a go.
In my opinion the IS-F engine is way to big to fit in this car. I can say this because me and my fiance have 4 cars The FRS,TC,IS-F and her toy new 2011 SRT-8 charger mopar (Fast). I was researching the IS-F engine and I can say for a fact that with out tons of cutting and welding fabricating and even still that engine will not fit in the frs. But it does seem like a nice idea.
mauriceproductions is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Got 2jz?



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:01 PM.