How fast can a Stock Auto-xB Go?
#81
Originally Posted by djct_watt
By the way, a Ferrari F430 weighs 3,197lbs, a Ferrari 612 weighs 4,056. . . both of which weigh more than a 'Vette.
And a Ferrari Enzo supercar weighs 3,009. . . which is only about 131lbs less than the 3,132lb C6 ZO6. The argument that the 'Vette is heavy does not hold water. The Enzo is a friggin street legal F1 car.
And a Ferrari Enzo supercar weighs 3,009. . . which is only about 131lbs less than the 3,132lb C6 ZO6. The argument that the 'Vette is heavy does not hold water. The Enzo is a friggin street legal F1 car.
Just let it go, this thread isn't even about vettes, ferrari's in the first place.
#82
Senior Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
I was merely pointing out that 3,132 lbs is not that heavy, relative to other well handling cars. I have no long love of 'Vettes, but there is good information and bad information. The 'Vette does not handle badly. . . and weight is hardly the culprit, since it's not much heavier than an xB.
This thread is about the ultimate performance of an xB. . . and although it may be impressive, the xB is hardly a super car. And the original point is that "keeping up" with something like a Corvette (since the 'Vette keeps up with Ferrari's, why stop at a Corvette) is a ludicrous concept. In all liklihood, the car was NOT racing, regardless of handling or acceleration, as the xB is beat (by a large margin) in the first place.
Even an 300C is ahead by leaps and bounds. A regular Chrysler 300 (the V6) would be a somewhat more feasible comparison.
Again, I would like to drop it, but there are more arguments being introduced regarding the weight of a 'Vette, and I'm only bringing in facts regarding how LIGHT it is for a car in its class.
This thread is about the ultimate performance of an xB. . . and although it may be impressive, the xB is hardly a super car. And the original point is that "keeping up" with something like a Corvette (since the 'Vette keeps up with Ferrari's, why stop at a Corvette) is a ludicrous concept. In all liklihood, the car was NOT racing, regardless of handling or acceleration, as the xB is beat (by a large margin) in the first place.
Even an 300C is ahead by leaps and bounds. A regular Chrysler 300 (the V6) would be a somewhat more feasible comparison.
Again, I would like to drop it, but there are more arguments being introduced regarding the weight of a 'Vette, and I'm only bringing in facts regarding how LIGHT it is for a car in its class.
#83
Originally Posted by djct_watt
I was merely pointing out that 3,132 lbs is not that heavy, relative to other well handling cars. I have no long love of 'Vettes, but there is good information and bad information. The 'Vette does not handle badly. . . and weight is hardly the culprit, since it's not much heavier than an xB.
This thread is about the ultimate performance of an xB. . . and although it may be impressive, the xB is hardly a super car. And the original point is that "keeping up" with something like a Corvette (since the 'Vette keeps up with Ferrari's, why stop at a Corvette) is a ludicrous concept. In all liklihood, the car was NOT racing, regardless of handling or acceleration, as the xB is beat (by a large margin) in the first place.
Even an 300C is ahead by leaps and bounds. A regular Chrysler 300 (the V6) would be a somewhat more feasible comparison.
Again, I would like to drop it, but there are more arguments being introduced regarding the weight of a 'Vette, and I'm only bringing in facts regarding how LIGHT it is for a car in its class.
This thread is about the ultimate performance of an xB. . . and although it may be impressive, the xB is hardly a super car. And the original point is that "keeping up" with something like a Corvette (since the 'Vette keeps up with Ferrari's, why stop at a Corvette) is a ludicrous concept. In all liklihood, the car was NOT racing, regardless of handling or acceleration, as the xB is beat (by a large margin) in the first place.
Even an 300C is ahead by leaps and bounds. A regular Chrysler 300 (the V6) would be a somewhat more feasible comparison.
Again, I would like to drop it, but there are more arguments being introduced regarding the weight of a 'Vette, and I'm only bringing in facts regarding how LIGHT it is for a car in its class.
An xb can out corner tons of cars with a well part set up regardless of rwd, fwd, awd, whatever. Driver plays a very much important role in everything. A car can only perform as well as the driver can.
Conclusion: Xb will never be drag queen, its strengths lay within cornering.
#84
Oh yeah, lets stop talking about vettes now. It has nothing to do with the xb, and if i wanted to talk about vettes i would go to one of their forums.
You can let it go man, its possible. I never said you were lying, but i'm not either. Its a heavy car, thats my opinion, for its class might be fairly light but i'm not talking about classes being its a xb thread. I'm talking generally speaking. I've brought nothing but one opinion and one fact to the "table" The video i spoke of, xb did infact hang with the vette through the corner, once straight away hit it was over.
Now lets pllllllease move on before i kill myself. Thank you.
You can let it go man, its possible. I never said you were lying, but i'm not either. Its a heavy car, thats my opinion, for its class might be fairly light but i'm not talking about classes being its a xb thread. I'm talking generally speaking. I've brought nothing but one opinion and one fact to the "table" The video i spoke of, xb did infact hang with the vette through the corner, once straight away hit it was over.
Now lets pllllllease move on before i kill myself. Thank you.
#86
Originally Posted by p2filz
look at that still talkin bout corvettes... the m3 could beat it as can the STi/I for the 06
Back to xb...anyone..
#89
Re: How fast can a Stock Auto-xB Go?
Originally Posted by edlin
2006 Auto, xB, completely stock drivetrain and intake.
Between Arizona and California, down hill (6% grade), on a 70 mile straightaway, 2am in the morning, with no other cars around for miles...
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/935...194crop2we.jpg
This was as fast as I could get it to go...
Between Arizona and California, down hill (6% grade), on a 70 mile straightaway, 2am in the morning, with no other cars around for miles...
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/935...194crop2we.jpg
This was as fast as I could get it to go...
Scion says top speed for the manual is 103 which would indicate as about 112. The higher sped would be enabled by the engine's turning over 5000 rpm to make more power. Here is a view of Toyota's test track where speed is probably tested:
http://www.taisei.com/project_details.asp?ProjectID=43
#90
Senior Member
Music City Scions
SL Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West TN - Land of twisty roads
Posts: 11,808
I was playing with mine the other day. It would go to about 105 out of OD and be at or near redline. Then when shifted into OD it would only gain a small amount and only maintain it. 110mph was about all it would go even tho it was far from redline. I don't think this small motor can push it any more because of the gearing. If 3rd was a bit taller it would go higher.
#92
Second there is no "damd edition" xB in any year.
Third, way to bring up a post that has been dead for 10yrs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CPL_Radar
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
5
03-05-2015 05:42 AM
darkshadowofxdeath
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2
12-03-2014 06:59 PM