Stock stereo + better speakers?
#21
You are making 3 points that have no factual support;
The stock 2008 HU is only 6w RMS.
The stock 2008 HU the same as the previous units.
A speaker change will offer minimal benefit if not accompanied by a HU change.
What are you basing these points on?
I am making one point backed up with direct personal experience.
The Polks sounded much better than the stockers with the same input.
Actually, here is a second point based on direct personal experience:
When I switched the HU from the stocker to the AVIC, I noticed an improvement in SQ, but the major difference was the better balance in volume between the fronts and rears.
The stock 2008 HU is only 6w RMS.
The stock 2008 HU the same as the previous units.
A speaker change will offer minimal benefit if not accompanied by a HU change.
What are you basing these points on?
I am making one point backed up with direct personal experience.
The Polks sounded much better than the stockers with the same input.
Actually, here is a second point based on direct personal experience:
When I switched the HU from the stocker to the AVIC, I noticed an improvement in SQ, but the major difference was the better balance in volume between the fronts and rears.
#22
Well the holy war I dreaded has begun, and sadly I am not smart enough to stay out of it, audio is close to my heart. You speak of the 6w RMS radio in the Scion line, I will let that be for now as I haven't tested personally, knowing you haven't either so I can't dispute that, yet. Now you also state that the after market HU will give you 25 extra watts, to which I hope you have more proof that what the AM HU companies print on the front of the radio. Looking at some of the AM HU websites, no names to protect the innocent, I find that the wow factor of the 45x4 printing on the 120 radio is truely a wopping 16 watts x 4, and when you make the massive cost increase to the 500 retail radio the power increases to a mamoth 18 x 4 rms. Now we can argue about that all day long if you want but the human ear is completely uncapable of hearing a difference of 2 watts, as a matter of fact the 3db change required to hear a sound level change requires double power, of which we are not even close here. So spending 3 times the dollars on the radio increases your power output that you so highly hail by 2 watts, inconsequential.
Couple this with data that Dave Navone and Richard Clarck gathered almost 10 years ago from factory HU from companies such as Visteon and Delco, two of the major manucaturers of factory HU's, at the time the factory HU produced an actual 13.7 watts for Visteon and 17.6 watts for Delco. Neither are barn burner numbers, but compare the Delco 17.6 watts 10 years ago with the 18 that the AM HU gives today and I really begin to question base of your argument.
You then go on to mention the tuning of the AM HU to the factory, at last glance both provide only Bass, Mid, and Treble adjustments at the base level radio, noting that as you increase in dollar you may also gain some crossover or BBE type of functions, but the basics still show that the same functions are comparable.
Sadly this has already turned one Scion owner around and convinced him not to go messing with his car, which was never the intention of any of us I am sure, but sadly this is the result and for that I appologize to TheMirthfulScion. The point I am trying ot make is that if you pocket book has one upgrade in it, and that upgrade is anything below adding a full amplified system with HU, speaks, and subs, then your money will be best spent on speakers. Agreed the factory radio is not GOD's gift to the car, but until you start purchasing very high end audio systems, not jus better HU's, the factory option will do you just fine in all respects.
Couple this with data that Dave Navone and Richard Clarck gathered almost 10 years ago from factory HU from companies such as Visteon and Delco, two of the major manucaturers of factory HU's, at the time the factory HU produced an actual 13.7 watts for Visteon and 17.6 watts for Delco. Neither are barn burner numbers, but compare the Delco 17.6 watts 10 years ago with the 18 that the AM HU gives today and I really begin to question base of your argument.
You then go on to mention the tuning of the AM HU to the factory, at last glance both provide only Bass, Mid, and Treble adjustments at the base level radio, noting that as you increase in dollar you may also gain some crossover or BBE type of functions, but the basics still show that the same functions are comparable.
Sadly this has already turned one Scion owner around and convinced him not to go messing with his car, which was never the intention of any of us I am sure, but sadly this is the result and for that I appologize to TheMirthfulScion. The point I am trying ot make is that if you pocket book has one upgrade in it, and that upgrade is anything below adding a full amplified system with HU, speaks, and subs, then your money will be best spent on speakers. Agreed the factory radio is not GOD's gift to the car, but until you start purchasing very high end audio systems, not jus better HU's, the factory option will do you just fine in all respects.
#23
Just change your speakers, it will make your stereo sound amazing! Who needs 2/4 Channel amps? Why do they even make them? The almighty powerful 160w Pioneer stock stereo will supply your $200-300 component speakers with more than enough power to make your car into a SQ and DB champion.
If I can spend a couple hundred and get a boost in the sound quality, enough to satisfy my ears, I'll be happy. I don't have a ton of cash to throw around on high end equipment and labor to have it all installed.
Thank you LVMYXB for the advice. I'm not sure if I'm going to do anything at all after reading all this, but I appreciate the "best bang for the buck" breakdown.
#24
Originally Posted by TheMirthfulScion
Thank you LVMYXB for the advice. I'm not sure if I'm going to do anything at all after reading all this, but I appreciate the "best bang for the buck" breakdown.
J/K...whichever you choose, good luck with the family.
#26
so what's the verdict?? if you only had say a hundred or 2 to spend........do you....A) stick with stock speakers & go with a different HU, or B) do what the broken record is endorsing... change your speakers out??..... let's vote..... reply with A) or B)..... jh
#27
I can definitely understand keeping in a budget. I suggest turning off all the built in equalization including the type car SSP setting. I put all of mine to flat to get a good starting point and haven't changed it. It really leveled out the sound and the front to rear imbalance I've seen many posts about. It's still not perfect by any means but it's worlds above the over tweeked SSP settings.
#28
Originally Posted by chadfo
I can definitely understand keeping in a budget. I suggest turning off all the built in equalization including the type car SSP setting. I put all of mine to flat to get a good starting point and haven't changed it. It really leveled out the sound and the front to rear imbalance I've seen many posts about. It's still not perfect by any means but it's worlds above the over tweeked SSP settings.
I am no audio expert, But I am a musician and have lots of experience with audio in general. My take is this.
Speakers will make a bigger difference than head units in the small budget situation. i agree that signal source can prevent the best speaker from sounding good, but I think in this case, the weakest link of the stock audio system is the speakers not the Head Unit.
#29
Originally Posted by chadfo
I can definitely understand keeping in a budget. I suggest turning off all the built in equalization including the type car SSP setting. I put all of mine to flat to get a good starting point and haven't changed it. It really leveled out the sound and the front to rear imbalance I've seen many posts about. It's still not perfect by any means but it's worlds above the over tweeked SSP settings.
#30
Originally Posted by BozzMan
Originally Posted by chadfo
I can definitely understand keeping in a budget. I suggest turning off all the built in equalization including the type car SSP setting. I put all of mine to flat to get a good starting point and haven't changed it. It really leveled out the sound and the front to rear imbalance I've seen many posts about. It's still not perfect by any means but it's worlds above the over tweeked SSP settings.
#31
I'm going to throw my 2 cents in even though I know the debate is over. I agree that speakers are the best investment to get better sound. The speakers are what actually creates the sound. It doesn't matter what you do before the signal gets there if the speakers aren't good.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MyNameIsMud
Scion FR-S ICE & Interior
1
03-04-2015 05:27 PM
darkshadowofxdeath
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2
12-03-2014 06:59 PM