xA vs Mini?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
DeepSouth Scions
SL Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 671
From: Gulf Coast
xA vs Mini?
After reading https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=42357 I was talking to one of the guys I work with,and he made the comment "Maybe they will make it more like the mini". I know that in autocross the mini is considered one of, if not, the Best H Stock class cars, so I decided to do a Side by Side comparison of the manufactuer specs of both the Mini and the xA
So going by the numbers the xA is only slightly behind the Mini.
I think if the new xA were to increase track by 1-2 inches, drop 3 inches off height and perhaps jack the engine to a 1.8-2.0L then I would think that would make the xA the perfect H stock car.
Thoughts?
Code:
Spec XA Mini Difference
Displacement 1.5L 1.6L Mini (+.1L)
Bore X Stroke 75mm x 84.7mm 3.03in x 3.38in Mini
(2.95in x 3.33in)
Compression 10.5:1 10.6:1 Mini (+0.1:1)
Horsepower 108 115 Mini ( +7HP)
Torque 105 110 Mini (+5)
Dimensions
Height 60.2in 55.9in XA (+4.3in)
Wheelbase 93.3in 97.1in Mini (+3.8in)
Track (F/R) 57.3in / 56.3in 57.4in / 57.7in Mini (+0.1in / 1.4in)
MPG 32/37 28/36 XA (+4/1)
Weight 2340lbs 2524lbs Mini (+184)
I think if the new xA were to increase track by 1-2 inches, drop 3 inches off height and perhaps jack the engine to a 1.8-2.0L then I would think that would make the xA the perfect H stock car.
Thoughts?
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
From: Vancouver
Driving the Mini Cooper S is the most fun you can have in a stock FWD car, period. The experience cannot be expressed in numbers.
I would love to see someone take the time and effort to tune the xA suspension to the level of handling offered by the Mini. I believe that it's possible, but who will step up to the plate?
I would love to see someone take the time and effort to tune the xA suspension to the level of handling offered by the Mini. I believe that it's possible, but who will step up to the plate?
Senior Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 409
From: South Jersey
[quote="bryan"]Driving the Mini Cooper S is the most fun you can have in a stock FWD car, period. The experience cannot be expressed in numbers.
quote]
I owned a Mini for almost 2 years and I agree. I did not have the S but I had the Sports Suspension Plus package (same suspension as the S). Also the steering was much better than the xA. Very fun car to drive!
The downside is that the Mini had a lot of mechanical problems and the dealer netwaork is very thin. Frequent trips to the dealer that was over an hour away lead to me getting rid of the car. The Mini was also $7200 more than my xA.
quote]
I owned a Mini for almost 2 years and I agree. I did not have the S but I had the Sports Suspension Plus package (same suspension as the S). Also the steering was much better than the xA. Very fun car to drive!
The downside is that the Mini had a lot of mechanical problems and the dealer netwaork is very thin. Frequent trips to the dealer that was over an hour away lead to me getting rid of the car. The Mini was also $7200 more than my xA.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 882
From: Rolling Meadows, IL
[quote="Epitrochoid"}
The downside is that the Mini had a lot of mechanical problems and the dealer netwaork is very thin. Frequent trips to the dealer that was over an hour away lead to me getting rid of the car. The Mini was also $7200 more than my xA.[/quote]
Sort like the old TRs mechanically. Those used to break constanlty.
The downside is that the Mini had a lot of mechanical problems and the dealer netwaork is very thin. Frequent trips to the dealer that was over an hour away lead to me getting rid of the car. The Mini was also $7200 more than my xA.[/quote]
Sort like the old TRs mechanically. Those used to break constanlty.
Senior Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 409
From: South Jersey
[quote=Joehnn]
Sort like the old TRs mechanically. Those used to break constanlty.
LOL!! Not quite THAT bad!! :D
BTW, a friend of mine lemon lawed his and bought an xB. He goes by Macncheese.
Here's our lemons...
Originally Posted by "Epitrochoid"}
The downside is that the Mini had a lot of mechanical problems and the dealer netwaork is very thin. Frequent trips to the dealer that was over an hour away lead to me getting rid of the car. The Mini was also $7200 more than my xA.[/quote
The downside is that the Mini had a lot of mechanical problems and the dealer netwaork is very thin. Frequent trips to the dealer that was over an hour away lead to me getting rid of the car. The Mini was also $7200 more than my xA.[/quote
Sort like the old TRs mechanically. Those used to break constanlty.
BTW, a friend of mine lemon lawed his and bought an xB. He goes by Macncheese.
Here's our lemons...
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,525
From: Orlando, Florida
TRs? Triumphs? My dad had a TR7...I almost bought a mint TR6 for $500, but when I went to pick it up, someone already took it. 
ries:
Stock, the Mini Cooper pushes about 108 hp to the wheels. Rumor has it that Mini/BMW underrated the Cooper so the Cooper S's horse power would look like a bigger difference.
My friend has a Mini Cooper and all he has is a K&N drop-in filter and exhaust work. He pushes @ 125 hp to the wheels...
ries:Stock, the Mini Cooper pushes about 108 hp to the wheels. Rumor has it that Mini/BMW underrated the Cooper so the Cooper S's horse power would look like a bigger difference.
My friend has a Mini Cooper and all he has is a K&N drop-in filter and exhaust work. He pushes @ 125 hp to the wheels...
Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 79
The Mini is a little 3-door sports car with a tiny interior. The xA is a little 5 door econo car with a good sized interior.
I found the Toyota Celica GT-S to be way more fun a test drive than the Mini. Though the don't make it anymore, the Prelude SH was even better at turning. What a hell of a front driver. Never drove the RSX. I sat in it, and when I stopped gagging at the interior, I got out. We have an Integra and its nice, but not terribly sporty in RS trim.
Course, the Miata is by far the most fun test drive of them all. Even more fun than the annoyingly twitchy S2000.
I found the Toyota Celica GT-S to be way more fun a test drive than the Mini. Though the don't make it anymore, the Prelude SH was even better at turning. What a hell of a front driver. Never drove the RSX. I sat in it, and when I stopped gagging at the interior, I got out. We have an Integra and its nice, but not terribly sporty in RS trim.
Course, the Miata is by far the most fun test drive of them all. Even more fun than the annoyingly twitchy S2000.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,525
From: Orlando, Florida
Yeah, I bought some new art supplies a few days ago. It took up the whole back of my xA (rear seats down). I don't think I would've been able to transport the papers/boards in a Mini without compromising view...
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 556
From: Orange County, CA
I have a question for you guys, I was going to make it a thread but decided to put it in this thread. What about a USED(2000-2004) Mini Vs. a 2005 xA? i really want a mini but in order for the prices to be competitive, i'd have to get a used mini because i plan to buy an xA that costs 15,100 which comes with fogs. moonroof and an auto tranny and frankly i can't spend too much more than 15100. So what do you guys think about whats a better purchase???
Senior Member
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
ummm well if price is an option stick with the xa much cheaper to maintain in the long run. if money werent as much of a deal i'd be looking for a used mini S alot more fun but maintanence will be horrible.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Originally Posted by Hey Sucka
I have a question for you guys, I was going to make it a thread but decided to put it in this thread. What about a USED(2000-2004) Mini Vs. a 2005 xA? i really want a mini but in order for the prices to be competitive, i'd have to get a used mini because i plan to buy an xA that costs 15,100 which comes with fogs. moonroof and an auto tranny and frankly i can't spend too much more than 15100. So what do you guys think about whats a better purchase???
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
MN Scions
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 498
From: Hastings, MN
I was thinking of buying a mini this year, last year my wife and I bought an xB for her and since we have one people hauling vehicle I thought so why get another, I have test drove them, they are fun, then I read of the list of problems they had, I know this is not the tC page but I am going to get one of those instead, more room, more features more power and less $$ than a mini, heck the xA with about 2k in aftermarket parts will have a lot more fetures, and will still have money in the bank. European cars are nice when new but fall apart fast.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Originally Posted by javastan
European cars are nice when new but fall apart fast.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 882
From: Rolling Meadows, IL
Originally Posted by mikochu
TRs? Triumphs? My dad had a TR7...I almost bought a mint TR6 for $500, but when I went to pick it up, someone already took it. ries:
...
ries:...
The only cars less reliable where Fiats (Fix It Again Tony). :twisted:
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 882
From: Rolling Meadows, IL
Back to the topic.
Minis are built well and are good cars, but are priced way too high.
The xAs are a better value. I almost bought an xA, but the extra room you get in an xB was too good to pass up.
Minis are built well and are good cars, but are priced way too high.
The xAs are a better value. I almost bought an xA, but the extra room you get in an xB was too good to pass up.
Senior Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 409
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by econobox
The Mini is a little 3-door sports car with a tiny interior. The xA is a little 5 door econo car with a good sized interior.
I found the Toyota Celica GT-S to be way more fun a test drive than the Mini. Though the don't make it anymore, the Prelude SH was even better at turning. What a hell of a front driver. Never drove the RSX. I sat in it, and when I stopped gagging at the interior, I got out. We have an Integra and its nice, but not terribly sporty in RS trim.
Course, the Miata is by far the most fun test drive of them all. Even more fun than the annoyingly twitchy S2000.
I found the Toyota Celica GT-S to be way more fun a test drive than the Mini. Though the don't make it anymore, the Prelude SH was even better at turning. What a hell of a front driver. Never drove the RSX. I sat in it, and when I stopped gagging at the interior, I got out. We have an Integra and its nice, but not terribly sporty in RS trim.
Course, the Miata is by far the most fun test drive of them all. Even more fun than the annoyingly twitchy S2000.
I drove a Celica GT-S - way too small and boring. A tC would be better IMO.
I drove a Prelude SH for a weekend. Again, too small but a lot of fun to romp around in. Limited cargo space even compared to the Mini.
I test drove the RSX-S - very fun, great shifter nice power. Out side the car b o r i n g.
Miata - love em but can't fit. Same with the S2000. My Rx8 would be the better choice here for perfomance and pacticality (except in snow). However, these are totally different cars and don't belong in this disscussion.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 331
From: Hawaii at heart, L.A. in
we got a mini (non-s) trade in. and i romped it. was very unimpressed. didn't have anywhere to take it on curves. but, as far as straightline speed, the xA is probably faster. in large part due to the gearing i assume. dunno, thats what i got from driving the one we took in. and it seemed to be running fine...but, i'm not a mechanic.