Notices
All Other Vehicles Concepts and non-Toyotas...

honda crx vs Lamborgini

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 04:23 AM
  #1  
geo46_2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 704
From: Anaheim, CA
Default honda crx vs Lamborgini

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=47e_1191294022

i find it hard to believe that crappy looking honda can actually beat a lambo, check out for yourself.
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 04:30 AM
  #2  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Why? That CRX probably weighs 1800 lbs with a full tank and a driver. It probably only would need 300-350 whp to smoke that Lambo.
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 04:43 AM
  #3  
Dispatcher138's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,306
From: Derty Jerz 908
Default

I'd still rather be driving that lambo.
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
jct's Avatar
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,961
Default

the song in the video sucked dingle berries...
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 04:25 AM
  #5  
Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Balliztik
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,338
From: Puyallup, Washington
Default

find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 05:45 AM
  #6  
Dispatcher138's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,306
From: Derty Jerz 908
Default

Originally Posted by Matthews_Lewis_Racing6226
find that hard to believe that the lambo lost...it look like he was acting and or wasnt trying.....

Yeah cuz towards the end a porsche and the crx race and the porsche smokes the crx.
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #7  
CDogbert's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,906
From: N38° 37', W90° 17'
Default

Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?

And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 05:52 AM
  #8  
Dispatcher138's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,306
From: Derty Jerz 908
Default

Originally Posted by CDogbert
Shenanigans. Who just carries around a camera racing things on the highway?

And it would need to put out 312hp to match the power/weight of a 2001 Murcielago. </nerd>


The people that put ____ like that on the internet daily. lol
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #9  
xbizzle562's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Default


http://videos.streetfire.net/video/G...008_145565.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/S...-in_146327.htm
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #10  
scionBoy86's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
Default

u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 01:45 AM
  #11  
xbizzle562's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Default

I know you weren't talking about the Supra vs tha lambo scionBoy86 cause that LP640 was Owned buy that Supra and that Lambo was at full throttle and with a 2 second head start to boot
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #12  
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,746
From: LOWLOW Chicago
Default

Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #13  
xbizzle562's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/7...whp_168259.htm
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #14  
scionkidd's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 671
From: I Shoot Flames!
Default

ok this is just to get the honduh fanboys excited.

next u'll see a 198x civic hatch takin an Ferrari FXX or a Koenigsegg CCX...

then u'll see a 2007 Civic SI take a Ducati 999RR or an Aprilla...

that thing is staged!
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 08:35 AM
  #15  
scionkidd's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 671
From: I Shoot Flames!
Default

Originally Posted by scionBoy86
u guys are dumb if u think this is a real video..he wasn't even at full throttle the lambo
http://youtube.com/watch?v=TWN_lbtVxIg
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #16  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

I can't believe people are dumb enough to think this is fake. The CRX Si only weighs 1890 lbs from the factory. Gut the interior, lose the A/C, add some CF and it's easily down to 1500lbs. Throw a B18C5 or K20 in it, turbo it and you're looking at 350-400whp and 1700lbs. Now compare that to the Lambo which is at about 500whp and 3638. 100 HP =/= 1900 lbs.
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #17  
CDogbert's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,906
From: N38° 37', W90° 17'
Default

Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #18  
SchaumburgScionJT3's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 618
From: Schaumburg Scion/ Toyota
Default

makes sense to me haha
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #19  
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,746
From: LOWLOW Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by xbizzle562
Originally Posted by yellowxhoodie
Fully Gutted CRX w/ Fully Built B18 and Big **** Turbo > Lambo anyday

(and im just assuming its a fully built B18, but if it moves like that then more than likely it is)
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/7...whp_168259.htm
that was from a dig.
the other video was from a roll.
big difference.

and thats also a 1200HP Supra Not a Lambo
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #20  
yellowxhoodie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

Trader
SL Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,746
From: LOWLOW Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by CDogbert
Exactly, and I think because most people don't grasp the concept of power/weight. So, incoming science!

A 2001 Murcielago weighs 3638 lbs, and it produces 572hp. Divide the weight by the power, and you find that each Italian horse is burdened with 6.36 lbs. Obviously, the lighter the horse, the more efficiently it can prance around (and be expensive and make a lot of noise and such).

Following Carbon's numbers, the old CRX Si weighs 1500 lbs after you take out all the useless, heavy bits (I've seen even lower than that, but we won't go there). In order to match the efficiency of the Lambo (6.36 lbs/hp), it would only need to stuff 235.84 mythical Japanese dragons under it's rusty skin, which you can get from even mildly tinkering with a K20A.

Doesn't make sense? How can a 235hp festival of rust and frugality trounce a 572hp precision instrument of speed? Well, consider this: the Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa will go from 0-60 in about 2.5 seconds. It has only about 175 horsepower, but it only weighs about 500 lbs. That means it saddles every horsepower with less than half the weight of the Lambo, and it goes about twice as fast as a result. Make sense now?
o man.
if anyone argues with this they deserve a ban.
lol.

or they better provide a dammmn good counter argument with numbers and stats to back it up.



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 AM.