Notices

Official 2011 Scion tC Thread (2nd gen)

Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:28 PM
  #21  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Hhahahahahaha the back is TERRIBLE.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:28 PM
  #22  
SighOnPhresh's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 387
From: Oceanside, San Diego
Default

i actually like our tc's better in the way that it looks interior and exterior.
i was itching for the new pics of the car, just hoping that i wouldnt be all jealous about it lol.
but looks is a big no-no. looks like a mazda camry.
=]
(said that in the other post)
but im sure the specs beats ours. fasho. sad face.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #23  
ack154's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Originally Posted by WAlterEgo
SCION iQ and tC
PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATIONS

2011 SCION iQ
POWERTRAIN
Engine: 1.3-liter, 4-cylinder with Dual VVT-i
Drivetrain: Front-wheel drive
Transmission: Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

DIMENSIONS (inches)
Overall Length: 120.1
Overall Width: 66.1
Overall Height: 59.1
Wheelbase: 78.7
Seating Capacity: 4

2011 SCION tC
POWERTRAIN
Engine: 2.5-liter, 4-cylinder with Dual VVT-i
Drivetrain: Front-wheel drive
Transmission: 6-speed M/T or 6-speed A/T with Sequential-Shift

DIMENSIONS (inches)
Overall Length: 174.0
Overall Width: 70.7
Overall Height: 55.7
Wheelbase: 106.3
Seating Capacity: 5
Adding to first post. Thanks.

Originally Posted by AdmirN
Try clicking the "Press Release" a window should pop up and you can download all the images from there, then just unzip it and post them up on here...
That's what I did... 75kb/s (337MB)
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #24  
Domo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,006
From: Earth
Default

lulz...im at school and was watching the countdown. As the countdown finally ended, the first thing that popped up was a notification that I needed flash......haha FML. Any who...the rear sucks, the door speakers suck, the final video sucks. Whats the last feature?
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:31 PM
  #25  
WiCKD_tC's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 47
From: Virginia
Default

This is only going to make our 1st gen tC's more of value to those who want them after the fall, because I'm not impressed with the 2nd gen at all.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:31 PM
  #26  
ack154's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

I think the rear would be better without the damn amber in the tails. WTH?
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #27  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by ack154
Steering wheel controls.
Moonroof... yadda yadda yadda.

Where's the big surprises they left out before?
The big surprise is probably the iQ.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #28  
kanundrum's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,114
From: Laurel, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Domo
lulz...im at school and was watching the countdown. As the countdown finally ended, the first thing that popped up was a notification that I needed flash......haha FML. Any who...the rear sucks, the door speakers suck, the final video sucks. Whats the last feature?

I LOLED at this ah man hahahaha

Looks Interesting I wonder what the BIG Surprise is as well. So far nothing too special besides styling q's
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #29  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by ack154
I think the rear would be better without the damn amber in the tails. WTH?
Nothing can save the rear.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #30  
neolusions's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 513
Default

I cant say anything I like about the exterior either. Is it just me or does the front look like a Kia Forte Koup?
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:34 PM
  #31  
ack154's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

I realize they RS 1.0 was red, but they NEED to release it in that color.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:34 PM
  #32  
burstaneurysm's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,312
From: Forest Park, IL
Default

Four minutes left on the presskit.

They really blew it when the site hit the wall.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #33  
dante's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 507
From: Middle of nowhere, WI
Default

Originally Posted by SighOnPhresh
i actually like our tc's better in the way that it looks interior and exterior.
i was itching for the new pics of the car, just hoping that i wouldnt be all jealous about it lol.
but looks is a big no-no. looks like a mazda camry.
=]
(said that in the other post)
but im sure the specs beats ours. fasho. sad face.
Screw that, you want to know the best spec of the original 2005 model year tC? It's that mine is PAID FOR.

But yes, for me this just means driving my current tC for another year or two before moving on to something better (MINI Cooper S? FT-86? Abarth 500 SS? Only time will tell). This new tC has zero interest from me, since as I stated before it looks only evolutionary as opposed to revolutionary. No way am I going to drop $20k for 6sp and 20 more hp.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #34  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default



Haha, it looks like they're really trying to cut costs in some places. That thing looks flimsier than the 1st gen tC's cargo cover.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #35  
ack154's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Originally Posted by neolusions
I cant say anything I like about the exterior either. Is it just me or does the front look like a Kia Forte Koup?
I'd have to look at them side by side, but I didn't get that impression at all.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:37 PM
  #36  
SLEEPER24's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 176
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by neolusions
I cant say anything I like about the exterior either. Is it just me or does the front look like a Kia Forte Koup?
the front kind of looks like a honda accord 2 door, wheres the ft-86, damn toyota
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #37  
SighOnPhresh's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 387
From: Oceanside, San Diego
Default

yea my bad dante i really didnt want to rant 100% negatively on the new tc.
i just new that it had more HP thats all =]
but im with you bruh im paying for the 09 tc myself so im with you there.
tail lights...
holy crap.
i took a crap.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #38  
Cabana's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,042
From: Los Angeles
Default

I much prefer the current interior to the new one
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #39  
THE_DON's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,170
From: Los Angeles
Default

Not feeling the tail lights... I'd like to see it without a wing.

Overall, it's OK, I like the old tC's looks better, while this one has better specs.

The new xB should have received the new 2.5 as well...

-THE DON
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #40  
dante's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 507
From: Middle of nowhere, WI
Default

tC:



Forte Koup:



Yeah, I'm not really seeing the similarity either.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02 PM.