How much whp does the tc have stock?
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by engifineer
I would have to agree that those dynos are incorrect, the larger rims will yeild less power. .
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by engifineer
I would have to agree that those dynos are incorrect, the larger rims will yeild less power. .
right, but on low profile tires, you could conceivably increase the rim diameter, and decrease the tire height, leaving you with a larger rim size, but the same overall tire height, correct?
correct, so if you have larger rims with lower profiles that keep the diameter the same, and they weigh less, then you could be applying more power to the ground. But you would be running some mighty low profiles on 19s to do that.. talk about buuumpy!
Not saying they didnt though, it is entirely possible.
Originally Posted by Draxas_VP
That should be 143.49 HP... the 153.41 is the TQ. This car was indeed stock. Dynoed at R&D Dyno in Gardena, CA... owned by Phillip, the current President of the SoCal tC Club.
We are set to do another dyno very soon with K&N Intake, AlphaWerks Header, Draxas S-PIpe and Draxas Exhaust...
We are set to do another dyno very soon with K&N Intake, AlphaWerks Header, Draxas S-PIpe and Draxas Exhaust...
hmmmmm, i have a question...if torque = force x distance...wouldnt the further away the force is from the radius mean more torque...so larger wheels would mean more torque? for instance...lets say a force of 1000# at a distance of 2 inches would be a torque of 2000...and then a force of 1000# at a distance of 4 inches would be a torque of 4000...isint 4000 greater that 2000? engifineer...tell me where the mistake is in my logic...cuz something doesnt make sense...
Originally Posted by solotc
hmmmmm, i have a question...if torque = force x distance...wouldnt the further away the force is from the radius mean more torque...so larger wheels would mean more torque? for instance...lets say a force of 1000# at a distance of 2 inches would be a torque of 2000...and then a force of 1000# at a distance of 4 inches would be a torque of 4000...isint 4000 greater that 2000? engifineer...tell me where the mistake is in my logic...cuz something doesnt make sense...
Ok... if I messed up any of that.. bear with me.. I have had a couple of beers this evening
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by kutsuju_dj
i guess not that good of a search, look on the scion website...duh
ummmm, except that www.scion.com posts hp at the crank, not *whp* like the title of this guys post says. duh.
Originally Posted by Series_1.0
boo..i hav an auto..oh well..any idea on how to get rid of some throttle lag besides grounding kit and torque damper?
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by Series_1.0
boo..i hav an auto..oh well..any idea on how to get rid of some throttle lag besides grounding kit and torque damper?
Thanks in advance.
Greg
Originally Posted by | Greg2385 |
Originally Posted by toastbox
Neither one of those will remove throttle lag. Throttle lag is a result of the drive by wire setup; there is a delay between input of pedal actuator, and output from ecu to TB. Neither a grounding kit (supplying more ground wires to the chasis/frame), nor a torque damper (prevents engine from "torque twisting") can help electronic programming delays.
Thanks in advance.
Greg
The throttle body (sometimes referred to as TB) houses the thottle valve. All it does is controll the amount of air the flows from the intake manifold, into the engine, where the air is mixed with the fuel.
Ground wires. That should be self explanatory....they are wires that ground the electrical system on your car. There's a lot of debate on them, in regards to adding horsepower (by means of creating a stronger spark at the spark plugs, I suppose) as well increasing current for electrical systems. You'll have to form your own opinions in regards to what ways ground wires can help.
"Torque Twisting"....I'm not sure that's really an actual term, it's really something I made up. The idea here is this: if your car is in neutral (or neutral/park for an auto), and you open the hood with the engine running, and you gun the engine, you'll see the engine "flex", or "twist". What's happening is the engine is producing centrifugal force (circular motion), and the amount of force (torque) is enough to cause the motor mounts to give a little. While this isn't a huge deal, if you are racing, tenths of a second is not only an eternity, often it is enough to determine the winner, and the first person to lose. So the engine damper acts as an extra brace to keep an engine from flexing (torque twisting) as much, which keeps *both* drive wheels firmly planted, which equals better traction. Without the damper, if you stomp the "air pedal", you can more easily feel one of the wheels struggling for traction as one side of the engine is flexing.
Hope this helps.





