|
Fastest RECORDED times for a S/C'ed tC that I know of...
SimplyScion, this thread is for you.
Went over to the ZPI forum, and stumbled upon these in the Drag/Street Racing sections. These are the Fastest Supercharged tC times that I have seen.
Originally Posted by OneSickScionTc
First time running on slicks, using 15x6.5 corolla S stock rims on 22x8x15 MT slicks and 19 inch axis mod rims in the rear, Modds to my tc is the factory sc and zpi 9 Psi pulley with the s pipe uncap.
SC TC 9PSI---------CIVIC HB LS/VTEC #8576------------------#684 .5718 -----reaction----1.0599 2.0182------60ft------2.4661 5.9042------330ft-----6.5571 8.5141---ET@ 594ft---9.3101 9.1052-----1/8 ET---- 9.9241 76.65-----1/8 MPH----73.28 11.8940----1000 ET----12.7931 88.39-----1000 MPH---85.23 14.2419----1/4 ET----15.2271 97.62-----1/4 MPH----93.95 And The FASTEST on recorded that I know of..
Originally Posted by josorl
I ran my TC 2005 automatic trasmission with S/C Kit and Nitrous 75 shot, the car have 269 WHP and the result is: My car is the number 4588 left size.
https://i119.photobucket.com/albums/...ke/Newtime.jpg |
supercharged tc's suck asss, but i'd rather be supercharged than nae'd,,, then again i'd rather be turbocharged than superchared
|
doesn't icenine aka karl have the fastest sc'ed tc?
|
^^That's mean...
|
Turbo FTMFW
|
Originally Posted by chooxd
doesn't icenine aka karl have the fastest sc'ed tc?
Until you have documented TRACK times, he can not claim that title. He does have the highest documented whp. But that does not equate to him being able to drive it that good. So, we would need to see some track times. Otherwise we would be doing "Hypothetical" speaking....and anyone that knows me...KNOWS I don't do "Hypotheticals". |
Originally Posted by ignitionr34
supercharged tc's suck asss, but i'd rather be supercharged than nae'd,,, then again i'd rather be turbocharged than superchared
|
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by chooxd
doesn't icenine aka karl have the fastest sc'ed tc?
Until you have documented TRACK times, he can not claim that title. He does have the highest documented whp. But that does not equate to him being able to drive it that good. So, we would need to see some track times. Otherwise we would be doing "Hypothetical" speaking....and anyone that knows me...KNOWS I don't do "Hypotheticals". |
Originally Posted by equinox2355
Originally Posted by ignitionr34
supercharged tc's suck asss, but i'd rather be supercharged than nae'd,,, then again i'd rather be turbocharged than superchared
I'd rather Move...then Turbo and be legal... :lalala: |
The S/C'er with the 14sec flat @ 105 timeslip...
That 105 trap speed is actually a mid 13sec car with better traction. His 60foot was 2.3 so there is Plenty of room and time to be made up. |
Originally Posted by equinox2355
Originally Posted by ignitionr34
supercharged tc's suck asss, but i'd rather be supercharged than nae'd,,, then again i'd rather be turbocharged than superchared
|
damn an auto s/c has the fastest recorded time? haha that surprised me. anything else on his car besides the 75shot?
|
that SC tC with the 14's @ 105 is from Puerto Rico! :D
|
there must but something in the water down ir Puerto Rico....
speaking of puertorico where did sciongt35r go??? |
Originally Posted by 05-RS1
damn an auto s/c has the fastest recorded time? haha that surprised me. anything else on his car besides the 75shot?
What I quoted, is all that he listed so far. |
Originally Posted by 318_tC
there must but something in the water down ir Puerto Rico....
Originally Posted by 318_tC
speaking of puertorico where did sciongt35r go???
|
Originally Posted by 05-RS1
damn an auto s/c has the fastest recorded time? haha that surprised me. anything else on his car besides the 75shot?
|
its def the water...
|
Originally Posted by trdtcpr
Originally Posted by 318_tC
there must but something in the water down ir Puerto Rico....
So that's where all the good gas is... :tap: :silly: So do yall just have C16 running through normal gas pumps at the gas station...LOL. |
I'd rather be S/C and make 200whp and have traction rather be n/a blowing thousands of dollars away to make 160whp or make 260+whp with turbo and have no traction.
Stop knocking the S/C just because you don't like it, it has it's uses and it makes good power for the 6-7psi of boost. Not everybody wants 300whp in a FWD car they drive to work everyday. I know I don't, I just couldn't handle being a really slow n/a car :P |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands