Notices
Scion xD Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

xD LT Header + Intake Manifold LATEST DYNO Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2008, 04:33 PM
  #81  
Member
SL Member
 
dynatek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 84
Default

Its probably just confusion over the original 145-hp post and the latest 148 hp numbers. No worries.
dynatek is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 07:21 PM
  #82  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Zefoxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,052
Default

I didnt say manifold The intake piping and airbox is what is in question
Zefoxe is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 08:07 PM
  #83  
Member
SL Member
 
dynatek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 84
Default

The air intake (CAI) used was a custom piece we designed that employed a 3-inch section of tubing connected tot he factory MAF and housed a filter inside the fenderwell. For our testing, we simply hung it out in the engine bay (with hood open). This improved power over the stock air box at every engine speed-there was no loss experienced anywhere in the rev range compared to the stock air box.

Originally Posted by Zefoxe
I didnt say manifold The intake piping and airbox is what is in question
dynatek is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 08:50 PM
  #84  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Zefoxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,052
Default Re: xD LT Header + Intake Manifold LATEST DYNO Results

Originally Posted by CASTREX
From Richard Holdener:


BTW-We already made 151 wheel hp with a version of the intake that won't be offered for sale-it adds a bit more peak power but sacrafices too much elsewhere)


Zefoxe is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 08:52 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Zefoxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,052
Default

i gathered from that, you lost power somewhere on the lower powerband with the intake piping and box unless you meant a whole different manifold all together
Zefoxe is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 09:05 PM
  #86  
Member
SL Member
 
dynatek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 84
Default

That statement was a comparison between two of our intake manifold designs (not between one of ours and the stock intake manifold). Intake manifolds can be tailored to maximize power at specific engine speeds. Rather than choose a design for maximum power (at higher engine speeds), the better choice for most street cars is one that maximizes average power production. Neither intake manifold (not to be confused with air intake aka CAI) lost power compared to stock intake, it is just that one made more peak power but less average power compared to what will be the production version.

Originally Posted by Zefoxe
i gathered from that, you lost power somewhere on the lower powerband with the intake piping and box unless you meant a whole different manifold all together
dynatek is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 07:10 AM
  #87  
Member
SL Member
 
Red_xD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 93
Default

So, are you guys planning to make a CAI for our cars, too??? I wouldn't mind buying the CAI and manifold, since we'll know that they're compatible with each other...
Red_xD is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 02:54 PM
  #88  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
misformartin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 448
Default

so when is the expected release date for the mani and header?
misformartin is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 09:09 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Wagonistas
SL Member
 
YELOSUB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 4,080
Default

So what happened to this?
YELOSUB is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 10:22 PM
  #90  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
pickledchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 957
Default

sour economy has hindered the progress last i heard.
pickledchang is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 05:35 AM
  #91  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Zefoxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,052
Default

The authors supplier/shop disapproved the project. Rather put their money into mustangs and corvettes.
Zefoxe is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 06:22 PM
  #92  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
scionmag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by Zefoxe
The authors supplier/shop disapproved the project. Rather put their money into mustangs and corvettes.
This is sad... I was actually getting excited reading thru the thread...
scionmag is offline  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:07 PM
  #93  
Junior Member
 
t0rres16's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3
Default

updates??????
t0rres16 is offline  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:55 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
misformartin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 448
Default 1

no updates this is not going to happen... project got canned...
misformartin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Besk_one
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
70
12-31-2003 05:21 PM
tbblizzard
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
9
12-10-2003 05:30 AM
Besk_one
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
10
12-06-2003 06:45 PM
Besk_one
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
26
11-19-2003 09:57 PM
eric_m
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power
29
10-12-2003 08:22 AM



Quick Reply: xD LT Header + Intake Manifold LATEST DYNO Results



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11 AM.