Follow-Up Test: 2006 Scion tC Supercharged
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 388
From: Nor Cal
Follow-Up Test: 2006 Scion tC Supercharged
Getting a grip on the supercharged Scion tC
By Ed Hellwig Email
Date posted: 01-09-2006
The first acceleration run is worthless, nothing but front-tire spin and smoke. Easing up the second time around, we bog the engine, miss a shift, and turn in a quarter-mile time that could vote.
You would think we were trying to launch a nitromethane-spewing Top Fuel dragster, but instead we're behind the wheel of a 2006 Scion tC coupe that looks like it could barely chirp the tires.
Ordinary tCs do struggle to grab rubber, but this is no ordinary Scion. Under the hood of this tC sits a centrifugal supercharger developed by Toyota Racing Development (TRD). It's squeezing 7 pounds of boost into the stock 2.4-liter four-cylinder with the help of a revised air intake. Bigger fuel injectors and a remapped engine control unit (ECU) assure an adequate mix of fuel and spark while a TRD exhaust spits out the leftovers.
Still, it's no Hemi Charger, so we continue to rip it down the drag strip in search of a respectable quarter-mile time.
Full article and video:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=108776
By Ed Hellwig Email
Date posted: 01-09-2006
The first acceleration run is worthless, nothing but front-tire spin and smoke. Easing up the second time around, we bog the engine, miss a shift, and turn in a quarter-mile time that could vote.
You would think we were trying to launch a nitromethane-spewing Top Fuel dragster, but instead we're behind the wheel of a 2006 Scion tC coupe that looks like it could barely chirp the tires.
Ordinary tCs do struggle to grab rubber, but this is no ordinary Scion. Under the hood of this tC sits a centrifugal supercharger developed by Toyota Racing Development (TRD). It's squeezing 7 pounds of boost into the stock 2.4-liter four-cylinder with the help of a revised air intake. Bigger fuel injectors and a remapped engine control unit (ECU) assure an adequate mix of fuel and spark while a TRD exhaust spits out the leftovers.
Still, it's no Hemi Charger, so we continue to rip it down the drag strip in search of a respectable quarter-mile time.
Full article and video:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=108776
Senior Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,720
Their jobs are not to tune it themselves.. they simply drive it how they get it.. if they get too much wheel hop or too much of anything, they simply use it as a way of showing the downside of the car.
Member
Team XcelsiA
SL Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by SilverRSXJezus
Ican't believe the found a way to price a tC with options to be around 26 k lol.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,356
From: Maryland
I think manufacturers are the ones who decide how test cars are optioned because they provide the media with the vehicles for evaluation.
I guess they're torn between trying to show a sparsely equipped car with a low MSRP or a car that shows all the available options with a much higher MSRP. Looks like we know which they chose in this case.
I guess they're torn between trying to show a sparsely equipped car with a low MSRP or a car that shows all the available options with a much higher MSRP. Looks like we know which they chose in this case.
Member
SL Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 74
From: Tempe, AZ
Yeah that car is at least 5-6k over priced and would be quicker with 17's. I do think without an LSD that the SI will always be the better car. The SI is going to hit 7.2 each time while most of the time the tC will spin the wheels. We really need an LSD.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 428
From: Tucson, AZ
Hey guys, how about when talking about a car's price, we include thousands of dollars in unnecessary options, and then complain about it? You think the new Si is about $19k? Wrong! I just built one for $25,241 with 18" wheels, spoilers, and all kinds of others stuff, and this doesn't even include the navigation system! If I add the navigation and some other options, the price will be around $29k! If you compare this to the new Lexus IS250, which runs for about the same amount of money, the Si loses big time. 
I can write a better, more objective review than those guys... Seriously.
I can write a better, more objective review than those guys... Seriously.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 428
From: Tucson, AZ
Right, maybe they thought the tires would give better traction, but that's not a good enough reason to compare prices when you "think" certain options improve the car. You can take any car on the market and push its MSRP by thousands by loading it with a plethora of options. Why are they comparing the base MSRP of the Si, with $10,000 (literally) of options added to the tC?
Member
SL Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 70
From: Las Vegas
I agree that the article is mis-leading, particularly in regards to the tC pricing. For a 'performance' only comparison, they should have used a stock tC with only the S/C, or perhaps S/C, springs/struts and kept the 17s. The rotational mass of the 18s could have have an effect on the runs.
Member
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 91
i think its a pretty good article, only problem i have with it are the horsepower numbers. I thought the supercharger made 200 at the wheels and the scion is rated at 160bhp, meaning we dont get a 40hp gain but actually more than that....that is one misleading part...
on the same note, with that in mind, si makes 197 bhp i think and tc makes 200 whp.....big difference between those numbers
put an LSD in it and we win, but stock for stock, the Si is a better car in terms of acceleration (more consistent) and handling probably as well....
on the same note, with that in mind, si makes 197 bhp i think and tc makes 200 whp.....big difference between those numbers
put an LSD in it and we win, but stock for stock, the Si is a better car in terms of acceleration (more consistent) and handling probably as well....
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Originally Posted by harrisch
i think its a pretty good article, only problem i have with it are the horsepower numbers. I thought the supercharger made 200 at the wheels and the scion is rated at 160bhp, meaning we dont get a 40hp gain but actually more than that....that is one misleading part...
on the same note, with that in mind, si makes 197 bhp i think and tc makes 200 whp.....big difference between those numbers
put an LSD in it and we win, but stock for stock, the Si is a better car in terms of acceleration (more consistent) and handling probably as well....
on the same note, with that in mind, si makes 197 bhp i think and tc makes 200 whp.....big difference between those numbers
put an LSD in it and we win, but stock for stock, the Si is a better car in terms of acceleration (more consistent) and handling probably as well....
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Why go supercharged whe you can go turbo and get a lot more horsepower. Right know I have my turbo set to 8 psi, which is what the TRD supercharger is claimed to be set to, and I have 232 whp!!! 254 lb-ft.
Check out this turbo in my cardomain page, this is a stage 1 turbo which is already for sale!
Check out this turbo in my cardomain page, this is a stage 1 turbo which is already for sale!