View Full Version : Dyno video of the Turbonetics Tc kit


MIAPLAYA
01-17-2006, 05:08 AM
First of all let me apologize in advance but the 4,000 fans Turbonetics runs in their dyno room makes it a masacare on audio. I did my best to get away from them and still hear the car but its next to impossible. Well heres the videos hope they at least get you an idea of the sound:

http://members.cox.net/k.suarez/tcdyno3final.wmv

http://members.cox.net/k.suarez/tcdyno1final.wmv

DJ_X_Trodinaire
01-17-2006, 05:15 AM
nice

MIAPLAYA
01-17-2006, 05:18 AM
nice
Thanks I tried...the fans MURDER the audio on my cam... :P

tC9o9
01-17-2006, 05:20 AM
thats crazy

MIAPLAYA
01-17-2006, 05:28 AM
thats crazy
Wait till you hear it in person :D

hahaitzskippy
01-17-2006, 05:31 AM
why isnt it done on a dynojet 248c?

isnt that more accurate to the wheels?

MIAPLAYA
01-17-2006, 05:34 AM
why isnt it done on a dynojet 248c?

isnt that more accurate to the wheels?
Turbonetics owns a Dynapack dyno. Main reason for this is the Dynapack is a load based dyno and therefore is better when tuning a car. The dyno chart Turbonetics has on their webpage with the 244/262 numbers were done on a Dynojet which typically reads about 5-10% higher then a Dynapack but is not considred ideal for dyno tuning since it is not load based but rather inertia based..

rhythmnsmoke
01-17-2006, 01:37 PM
Might I suggest you get a new camera....geesh, the mic on that thing sucks major cones.

tCb00b
01-17-2006, 02:36 PM
Nice vid. Look at that baby rock back and forth. I wonder if its that bad even without a turbo. Sorry I changed the subject but I'll finish with thats a shiny kit! :P

hahaitzskippy
01-17-2006, 04:06 PM
why isnt it done on a dynojet 248c?

isnt that more accurate to the wheels?
Turbonetics owns a Dynapack dyno. Main reason for this is the Dynapack is a load based dyno and therefore is better when tuning a car. The dyno chart Turbonetics has on their webpage with the 244/262 numbers were done on a Dynojet which typically reads about 5-10% higher then a Dynapack but is not considred ideal for dyno tuning since it is not load based but rather inertia based..

i c so you saying for TUNING purpose... its better to use a dynopack because you get better and more accurate readings while using a dynojet has the error of the wheel's interia.

dynojet better to measure whp. nice to know thx

MIAPLAYA
01-17-2006, 05:07 PM
Sorry but the fans murder audio when recodring...

As for the dyno yes. A load based dyno is better for tuning a car since it applies variable load to the car to simulate real world conditions. A dyno jet just spins a given weight and doesnt provide reactive load to the car...

Stu_Gotti
01-17-2006, 05:20 PM
HOT :)

Munch
01-17-2006, 05:24 PM
Sweet 8)

tikbhoy
01-18-2006, 04:04 AM
Sorry but the fans murder audio when recodring...

As for the dyno yes. A load based dyno is better for tuning a car since it applies variable load to the car to simulate real world conditions. A dyno jet just spins a given weight and doesnt provide reactive load to the car...

:clap: true

thats why i had mine on a dynapack too


are you going to have any dyno sessions for the scion day ?

hPower
01-18-2006, 04:07 AM
are you going to have any dyno sessions for the scion day ?


That would be a great idea
:)

MIAPLAYA
01-18-2006, 04:41 AM
I'm not sure if they plan to actually pull for the Scion Day. When they had the Z day I know there was some liability issues with having people walking around near the dyno during the pull but I'll see what they can do... There will be plenty of stuff going down though trust me... They will VSR balance a turbo (spin it up to 50k+ RPMs) to demonstrate how its done at the show..