05-RS1's NA auto tc dyno
well i dynoed my car yesterday. i was just bored and wanted to know how much power i actually have.
here's my setup:
2005 RS1 tC
Automatic
AW header
Injen CAI
DraXas S-pipe
Stock Midpipe
Greddy SP2
We did a total of 3 unofficial runs, 2 official. here are the dyno graphs. the first is UNCORRECTED and the second is CORRECTED.


sorry about the small pics..i usually use tinypic.com to host my images but i dont think they are up and running anymore. if anybody can resize for me that'd be appreciated. but i got about 140.9whp and 135.8 lb-ft tq. of the two runs, both were consistent with only .3 difference in whp and .5 difference in tq so it was a very accurate two runs. im ok with the numbers. i thought tq was a little low since the tc usually has more tq then hp but oh well. i've read that stock auto's dyno around 123whp-130whp so im happy with the gains i may have had with the mods i put on.
here's my setup:
2005 RS1 tC
Automatic
AW header
Injen CAI
DraXas S-pipe
Stock Midpipe
Greddy SP2
We did a total of 3 unofficial runs, 2 official. here are the dyno graphs. the first is UNCORRECTED and the second is CORRECTED.


sorry about the small pics..i usually use tinypic.com to host my images but i dont think they are up and running anymore. if anybody can resize for me that'd be appreciated. but i got about 140.9whp and 135.8 lb-ft tq. of the two runs, both were consistent with only .3 difference in whp and .5 difference in tq so it was a very accurate two runs. im ok with the numbers. i thought tq was a little low since the tc usually has more tq then hp but oh well. i've read that stock auto's dyno around 123whp-130whp so im happy with the gains i may have had with the mods i put on.
the loss in torque is probably due to the header. the 4-1 design is more for upper rpm horsepower gain. a 4-2-1 design like that of the MMW header should give you a little bit more low end torque if you ever feel ambitious enough to go swap your header.
Still, i would be very happy with that. An auto putting down 140 whp with bolt-ons (without a complete exhaust i might add) is awesome.
Still, i would be very happy with that. An auto putting down 140 whp with bolt-ons (without a complete exhaust i might add) is awesome.
^^thanks. and about the header, i thought it would tack on both hp and tq. i didnt think it would really cause much of loss at neither the low end nor high. but still happy with the numbers
Originally Posted by Sam_J84
Originally Posted by peteyd
ill race the both of you :D
you can't race me without blowin your motor!
and as for u pete, i wouldnt want u to blow ur motor over a race with two NA auto tc's
thanks for the comments everybody!
almost the exact same set up i will have in about a month...
MMW header/S-pipe + Injen CAI
Was expecting a little more power, but still damn better than what we've got stock.
MMW header/S-pipe + Injen CAI
Was expecting a little more power, but still damn better than what we've got stock.
I would be happy with those figures... You're likely to have a high 15's car with that...
I think the most decked-out N/A auto RSX, with way more mods, runs like 15.7... you're on the order of that.
I think the most decked-out N/A auto RSX, with way more mods, runs like 15.7... you're on the order of that.
Originally Posted by 05-RS1
Originally Posted by Sam_J84
Originally Posted by peteyd
ill race the both of you :D
you can't race me without blowin your motor!
and as for u pete, i wouldnt want u to blow ur motor over a race with two NA auto tc's
thanks for the comments everybody!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SloTC1
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
14
Aug 16, 2018 02:45 PM
Luisfc1972
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power
1
Sep 30, 2015 12:22 PM








