You obviously didnt read. It says mid-late 80's. That would be the 3rd gen not the MKIV.

 

i was actually responding to InfiniteVisi0ns' post smart guy. read pinoyFMtCs' post also in response to his statement. maybe you 'obviously didnt read'. try again

 

Highvoltage is right. If you continued reading, you would have saw my post.

 

like this right? as i was saying, i was responding to InfiniteVisi0n not you. thank you

 

No, you STILL didn't continue to read.

I already responded to him with the correct answer.

 

i do hope you know that until your post, everyone was talking aout mkiv's right? he then questioned the cost of them so you would think (if you could read properly) he was asking about them. sorry you fail again.

 

and if that is your logic too, based on what you said, i was also then stating up to his post, that there is no way a mkiv was sold for 20k. agreed? and wow, heres the kicker. here is what he said: 'lol when supras came out they were like 20 thousand..now the price market up is ridiculous'. guess what? even if he were talking about the 80's supras do they have a 'price market up'? nope. so then he must be talking about a mkiv because guess what, they DO have a crazy 'price market up'!!! ding ding ding ding.... reading comprehension > you.

 

Well sorry that you were like 2 weeks late on your post. So calm down there buddy dont get your panties in a wad. The question was answered so i dont think it needed a further response 2 weeks late. So maybe read the full post next time. Oh and now "que your smart butt comment cause you are ____ed at my response" Blah Blah Blah. Get over it.

 

read my last post lol.

 

InfiniteVision first said - 'lol when supras came out they were like 20 thousand..now the price market up is ridiculous'

Nothing in that statement about mkvi.

Pinoy said - "I thought the Supra Turbo, when new was around 40k-45k..."

That's the MKvi

I confirmed Pinoy's statement by saying - "They were. The 1994 N/A started at $36,000, the TT was $44,000."

Infinite then said - hmm dont recall maybe i should do more research but i remember having a conversation about the supra being 20 something

Obvious what he is saying.

I then told him that the mid-late 80's Supra was the model that cost low 20's.

Then you come in and say - "there is no way a na mkiv supra was 20k initially..."

Which means, you stopped reading when InfiniteVision FIRST said 20,000.

 

edit - nvm i had a post but i dont want to argue since its not gonna get anywhere. now we can be friends

 

just do like i did!

find a nice used is300 and hope one day you will have the cash to do a 2jz TT 6spd swap! LOL

seriously though

have you considered looking for a manual is300?

you can find them for 10-15k with low miles, then all u need is the swap and VOILA

4dr supra baby!!!

 

i havent really though about it, but really if i get a supra i want to show it off. Im not really a "sleeper" fan. Besides i think that the supra is the best lookin car ever made.

 

^^wrong Nissan Silvia then Nissan GTR any version r32 r33 r34 r35 those are way better looking then that whale of a Supra your talking bout.

 

everyone read this and stfu. lol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Supra

 

wow.
SL even filters out s.t.f.u now and changes it to quiet. hahaha

 

everyone ustfu wikipedia is not even creditable..lol but whatever Supras style derived from a Celica..like I said Nissan all the way.

 

Supra is the best looking hands down. The Silvia S15 is the second best. Then the R34. And that wikipedia article is pretty spot on.

 

ive wanted a supra for the last 12 years, i know pretty much everything about them, and that wiki article is a great read.

 

noooooooooooooo lol u really like the s15 styling over the r34? are we talking about stock, mild, or all out crazy body kits?