Notices
All Other Vehicles Concepts and non-Toyotas...

TC vs. Colbalt SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
NC_TC_2006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 21
From: North Carolina
Default TC vs. Colbalt SS

How does a TC with a cold air intake match up with a Factory stock Colbalt SS with the factory supercharger. I have been wandering this for a while know, but cant seem to find any information on comparing these two. Thanks!!!
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #2  
06scionsc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 277
Default

It gets its a$$ handed to it. You are comapring a forced induction car to a car with a filter and pipe that gives it maybe 5whp.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #3  
Serialk1llr's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
OhioScions
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 836
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

OOO OOO OOO Lock this thread!
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #4  
Shocker's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 476
From: Westside, AZ
Default

yea the cobalt ss will tear up the tC in the same respect that a supercharged tC will destroy a stock cobalt
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #5  
20tCDude05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,280
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

The REAL question is whether a Cobalt SS could beat a Turbonetic turboed tC.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #6  
PunkInDrublic's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,560
From: Long Island, NY
Default

^ Hell no, not a stock Cobalt SS atleast. A Turbonetics tC can look forward to seeing 13.7 with a good launch and sticky tires.

The real question and only question is which is faster, a Cobalt SS or a Supercharged tC?
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #7  
06scionsc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 277
Default

That is a much better question. How a forced induction tc would fair against a forced induction cobalt.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
Somnambulated's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,787
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

This thread makes my head hurt.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #9  
honey0bucket's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,041
From: Gladstone
Default

stop freaking asking these questions....LOOK THE NUMBERS UP AND FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF!!!! THERE ARE PLENTY OF TC VS. WHATEVER THREADS....

SEARCH SEARCH SEARCH



now that were asking questions..i was debating wether to buy my tC or a 350z...wich one would win in a drag? can anybody help, im a moron who doesnt know waht that red search button does....

sigh
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #10  
Ssmitty85's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Default

ok. lets put number together. the tc supercharged is at best 15.0 1/4milestock. while ive seen some stock cobalts do 14.5, cobalt has more wheel hp, and prob weighs less.? not to mention the LSD.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #11  
TongMan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,919
From: CA
Default

Supercharged SS Cobalt has 205HP vs Supercharged tC at 200HP

SPECIFICATIONS
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged Coupe

Base Price.................................$ 21,430
Price As Tested........................$ 23,410
Engine Type ..............................dual overhead cam, 16-valve; supercharged and intercooled; aluminum alloy inline four-cylinder
Engine Size................................2.0 liters / 122 cu. in.
Horsepower................................205 @ 5600 rpm
Torque (lb-ft) ............................200 @ 4400 rpm
Transmission.............................5-speed manual
Wheelbase / Length...................103.3 in. / 180.5 in.
Curb Weight ...............................2806 lbs.
Pounds Per Horsepower.............13.7
Fuel Capacity..............................13.2 gal.
Fuel Requirement........................91 octane unleaded premium gasoline
Tires............................................P215/45 WR18 Pirelli P-Zero
Brakes, front/rear........................vented disc / solid disc, antilock standard
Suspension, front/rear.................independent MacPherson strut /semi-independent torsion beam axle
Drivetrain.....................................front engine, front-wheel drive

PERFORMANCE
EPA Fuel Economy - miles per gallon
city / highway / observed
23 / 29 / 23.5
0 to 60 mph .................................6.1 sec (mfg)

OPTIONS AND CHARGES
Side head curtain airbags ............$ 395
OnStar system.............................$ 695
XM Satellite radio.........................$ 325
Destination charge.......................$ 565

From the numbers, the Cobalt SS would win. It's also over a hundred pounds lighter too.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #12  
NC_TC_2006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 21
From: North Carolina
Default

i'll stop asking these questions when you start posting some decent answers. If you dont like the questions then dont take the time to answer them

sigh
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #13  
hawgs74's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,447
From: Conway, AR
Default

There is a guy around here that has one and I have raced him a couple times. Its neck and neck till about third gear until his SC starts pulling hard.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 11:59 PM
  #14  
EnderSavesTheDay's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 768
From: Garden Grove, CA
Default

The tC will lose unless the Cobalt driver sucks *****. That's all common sense.

I think it's quite ludicrous that a 26 year old would even be concerned with this type of thing, let alone not be able to discern it his or herself. There have been lots of incidents with tCs and street races, none of them are pretty--a few fatalities. If you want to race, do it right or don't it at all.
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #15  
Indysolara's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 169
From: Indy
Default

Think of it this way also if you will buy the car the Chevy will be worth less that the scion when you are over with. That was a big thing with my decision.
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #16  
honey0bucket's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,041
From: Gladstone
Default

Originally Posted by NC_TC_2006
i'll stop asking these questions when you start posting some decent answers. If you dont like the questions then dont take the time to answer them

sigh
why dont you just look up the answers yourself? its really not hard. No offence or anything but these threads just get out of hand with people commng in and telling stories and so on and so fourth. Maybe nextime you can just do the research yourself.

Old Jun 5, 2006 | 12:47 AM
  #17  
Ssmitty85's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Default

plus there is a bigger WHP diff between the two cars as well. and you cant keep your warranty with a 7000rpm redline in the tc either. unlike the stage kits
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:12 AM
  #18  
roflitzjinno's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 746
Default

2 different cars. honestly.

cobalt = fi

tc = na
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:23 AM
  #19  
Ssmitty85's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by roflitzjinno
2 different cars. honestly.

cobalt = fi

tc = na

sry. i meant sc tc, and sc ss
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #20  
Ssmitty85's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Default

found a little fuel for the fire as well if is hasnt been previously posted. a Vid 2.2 cobalt 4 dr, v tc at track http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...07E1F3DF77.htm



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31 AM.