Notices
All Other Vehicles Concepts and non-Toyotas...

Warning! Warning! Warning! The new Rabbit has arrived!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #1  
woof's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 177
Default Warning! Warning! Warning! The new Rabbit has arrived!

This is the vehicle that will blow away the Scion, Yaris, Versa, Fit, you name it in the <$16K Derby.

I drove a two-door Rabbit with TipTronic Satuday and was blown away. This is NOT a chintzy automobile for the money. The dash has a pure quaility looks and feel. It's not a kiddie car but reeks of sophistication. The handling is tight and well-damped. The 2.5 liter 5 cyclinder will scream. The TipTronic really works well with up and down shifts, plus it has auto sports mode that will shift at higher points depending on how deep your foot is in it. Opening the hatch was a flashback to my '78 Rabbit. It was a hurge cave, plus the back seats fold flat to provide enough room for a bachelor to move his stuff in two trips. 8^)

The down side is the mileage: 22/30 for either manual or auto. Not in the fuel miser category but for what you get in value the mpg is easy to give up.

The two-door is $15K with 5-speed. The ONLY option I would need is the $400 wheel package that ups to 16 inch alloy wheels from 15 inch hubcaps (which don't look bad). Power everything, stereo, AND cruise control are standard.

BIG DEAL: right now they are coming from Germany. No Mexican or South American parts or labor! This car should smash the Beetle (which wouldn't be hard to do).

I'm seriously considering putting the xB in the paper because they actually have 4.8% rates for 60 months in July.

This is the car that is planned to put VW back on the map for young buyers. I ain't young and I'm pretty excited about the total package.
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 03:11 AM
  #2  
iyzmi's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,384
From: Milwauke, WI
Default

With gas prices growing as fast as they are, those extra 10mpg will be more important than the extra power of the Rabbit IMO. If that power meens your paying an extra $20 at the pump every week people will think twice before buying a 22MPG small car. Now when they bring the diesals over, that'll be a different story...
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 03:14 AM
  #3  
b_wet's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 655
From: White Plains, NY
Default

yeah the rabbit does look really hot, i also like the look of the new honda. like a small 03 Si
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #4  
jct's Avatar
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,961
Default

when they bring back the vw fox???

too bad nobody named a car the "Beagle"
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #5  
Subcompact Culture's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,974
From: Portland, OR
Default

I love the looks of the Rabbit, but 22 city is a joke for an "economy car."
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
Skunk's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
Default

Yeah, I don't think that car blows anything away. If I was shopping in that segment I'd take the Fit Sport, no contest at all. I'm glad they brought back the Rabbit name though.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 06:11 AM
  #7  
BeQuietAndDrive's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 319
Default

I's too bad the thing weighs 3000 lbs!

Seriously, no "compact" car should weigh that much!
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 04:29 AM
  #8  
woof's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 177
Default

Guys, you can't compare the Rabbit to the Fit. The Fit is tiny the Rabbit is NOT. Think of the Fit as an xA. Remember the Rabbit is bascially a Jetta without the trunk. SO, it is a bigger heavier car than ever, hence the Camry mpg instead of Scion mpg.
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #9  
scionlarry's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 130
From: Severn, MD
Default

I saw a Rabbit the other day while I was out. It looks pretty good from the outside. I like the looks better than the Fit.

But for the size I would of thought it'd get better gas milage.. guess that weight adds up, along with the engine..
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #10  
xdorkx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,766
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Whats it got under the hood? Engine/HP?
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #11  
Subcompact Culture's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,974
From: Portland, OR
Default

2.5 liter five-cylinder engine. 150 hp, 170 ft/lb torque.

Remember: The Rabbit is a C-segment car.
The Fit, xA and xB are B-segment cars.
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 04:43 PM
  #12  
xdorkx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,766
From: Orange County, CA
Default

True true, nice car.....decent hp, ehhh on the mpg
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #13  
Max's Avatar
Max
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member


SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,971
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I love the looks, and 22mpg is fine with me. It's just the manufacturer I am worried about.
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #14  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

I probably would have bought it instead of my tC if it had been out seven months ago.
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 11:18 PM
  #15  
Squishface's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Scion Dynasty
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 283
From: Clinton Twp, MI
Default

I'm suprised with the 5 cylinders it only puts out 150hp. That 170tq sounds promising tho. Wonder who would win in a race, tC or rabbit? My vote is on the tC.
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 04:10 AM
  #16  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

tC wins in acceleration (0-60 in 9.5, vs 7.5 for tC), but rabbit wins in handling
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 04:22 AM
  #17  
hayalex6's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team ScionEyed
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,122
From: Austin, TX
Default

Too bad it's a VW, and everyone knows they suck in reliability, and build quality.
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 04:31 AM
  #18  
xnevergiveinx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,408
From: North Royalton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by hayalex6
Too bad it's a VW, and everyone knows they suck in reliability, and build quality.
right on the money with that comment
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 04:38 AM
  #19  
thisisdudewhoru's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sci-Tech
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 765
From: Bristol, TN
Default

I also heard vw's are terrible in reliability.
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 04:40 AM
  #20  
hayalex6's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team ScionEyed
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,122
From: Austin, TX
Default

If anyone doesn't believe me, then they've never driven one with 30k miles on the odometer.

I used to valet before my knee went out, and I drove all sorts of cars, it really gave me a good idea on manufacturers who had their sh*t together.

2 worst brands I drove: Audi and VW. One was a brand new A4, and it rattled more than anything I've heard before, and I drove a new Jetta with about 15k on the clock, and the engine was making odd noises, and the person warned me that the parking break barely works--not to mention that the interior was falling apart as well.

The best build quality car? Tie Between Lexus ES class and the Hyundai Azera. The Hyundai had 50k miles, and it was dead quiet, and the interior still looked like new. I never liked Hyundai''s before that, now I'm seriously considering them as a trade in.



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04 AM.