Did anyone catch the interview on CNN? If not, here it is:

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/mar...6Sheen_CNN.htm

This is a very important video.

"This is the first time a major news station has covered 9/11 questions in any reasonable format, even if it was on a Hollywood celebrity show. "

 

Well there you have it. After all, his dad plays the president on TV, so he would obviously know the truth.

 

Umm, what does that have to do with the statements he made? Or are you just avoiding the real issue here...

 

I'm not avoiding it, I just have no desire to rehash all of that again. That very lengthy and exhausting thread wasn't that long ago.

 

Heres the link to the video on CNN directly

http://www.cnn.com/video/player/play...911.theory.cnn

Heathenbrewing, you know he's just a "leftist Hollywood liberal baby slapping elitist" GOSH!

Seriously though, I wish one of the people with a little more 'weight' would have come forward to question this first. He's probably the sacrificial lamb or something.

 

Yet you chime in with your derogatory remark.

And the point of this thread is NOT to rehash a previous debate, but to make a statement that it took 5 years for these questions to make it into the mainstream media. 5 years.

 

I like Charlie Sheen, but he simply is talking out of hi a$$.
Most of Congress sat at lunch, stunned when the reports came out of planes crashing - nobody had ever experienced anything like this here, and judging reactions is ridiculous.

His statements about the planes maneuvers are also idiotic.

Charlie Sheen is an actor - I'm not interested in what he or Beyoncé think about 9/11.

I'm down with anyone wanting to know more, but...

Scott

 

Thanks for the link Sanjuro!

While it would be better to have someone more qualified speaking, I think he did a decent job of not talking about conspiracy theories involving UFO's and little green men.

Also, it is nice to see a balanced report from CNN...they didnt dogpile him or put too many words in his mouth.

 

Ive seen a lot of people questioning various parts of the official story. It seems to be popping up all over the place. Hopefully it will lead to some REAL questions being posed to the right people. There is too much that doesn't fit once you scratch the surface.

That said, Im sure I will be disappointed.

 

Really?

You do know that the military was running "wargames"on September 11, 2001 involving terrorist who highjacked airliners looking to crash into buildings, right?

 

Baby steps my friend....baby steps.

 

How so?

 

Let's just go to the bottom line then - what is it that you're inferring here?
Are you saying we crashed military planes into the towers?
We imploded them after?

What's the point you're going for - I'm curious.

Scott

 

People question the reports on every major historical event - this is no different.
People also have theories on every such event that conflict with the "official" explanations.

What do you expect?

 

CIA / National Reconnaissance Office "plane into building" exercise; Associated Press, August 21, 2002; simulation of a plane crash into the NRO headquarters (near Dulles Airport, Virginia) - this was not a "terrorism" exercise but it did result in the evacuation of most NRO employees just as the "real" 9/11 was taking place, making it more difficult for the nation's spy satellites to be used to track the hijacked planes

Vigilant Guardian and Vigilant Warrior would be relevant topics of research.

 

My point is the biggest terrorist attack on this nations soil deserves a full, open investigation.

 

Well, I DONT like Charlie Sheen, but what he says may not be so idiotic. Even friends of mine in the airforce agree with this article.. I would like other pilots of heavys to comment...

http://www.physics911.net/sagadevan.htm


Very interesting.

 

No, this is actually quite different because we, the people, have live video documentation of the actual events, not some recreation after the fact.

This is very different. 'Operation Northwoods' would be an interesting read on any online encyclopedia.

 

You have a good point. But I would like to offer the Reichstag fire as an example where the nay-sayers were ultimately proven right. There is even a slight parallel to this 9/11 event.

Also, one needs to research Operation Northwoods if they think the military industrial complex isn't capable of doing such a thing in this country.

Physics don't lie.. something is wrong, and there may be no real 'conspiracy'. Perhaps we just don't have all the information. We at least need a better explanation, a release of the pentagon videos, black box recordings or something

 

You're right. We do have video. We have video of the planes crashing into the twin towers. We have the hard disc replay of the radar that tracked the planes from BWI to the towers. We have the surviving families of the passangers who were on those planes. Yes, we do have a lot of information.