Notices
Off-topic Cafe Meet the others and talk about whatever...

DSLR cameras

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #1  
Milano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 106
From: Corona, CA - Columbia, SC
Default DSLR cameras

hi, so i've been really wanting to get into photography and i would like to know everyones opinion on what camera to start with? i'm looking in the 500-700 range, also what would be good lenses to use. i plan on doing nature, cars, and metro life like building ranges and what not. if anyone could point me in the right direction that would greatly be appreciated.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #2  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...997&highlight=
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #3  
Milano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 106
From: Corona, CA - Columbia, SC
Default

thank you but i'm trying to get an opinion on something in my range, the cameras there are all more pro ones.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #4  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

There are plenty of entry level DSLRs in that thread. Most of those are with a D40 and XTi (or w/e the Canon entry is).

Just look at the D40 and the entry Canon, pick the one you feel more comfortable with.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
DonNguyen's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,657
From: San Diego (4s king)
Default

you can also pick up 30d's in that price range these days...
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #6  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

Check out the Pentax K200D. And by check it out, I mean read the specs and read reviews on it. You'll be impressed. The best part (IMO) is the image stabilization which is built into the camera BODY. Many cameras need special lenses that cost a fortune to get that feature. Because it's in the body of the K200D any old lens you put on it is stabilized. The price is right too.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0801/08...ntaxtk200d.asp
http://www.beachcamera.com/shop/prod...ku=PKK200D1855
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #7  
DonNguyen's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,657
From: San Diego (4s king)
Default

easy fix for lack of image stabalization is using a tripod.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #8  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

Originally Posted by DonNguyen
easy fix for lack of image stabalization is using a tripod.
True...if you have one with you. I don't carry one everywhere I go. With in-body stabilization I can take hand held shots zoomed to 300mm and they come out beautiful. Shake reduction won't make up for poor technique, but it is a feature I would never want to do without now that I've experienced it.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #9  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

My Nikon lenses came with it built in, cept for my macro lens, which shouldn't even be used for shots under 1/20sec.
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #10  
matt_a's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,794
From: Hanover, PA
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
My Nikon lenses came with it built in, cept for my macro lens, which shouldn't even be used for shots under 1/20sec.
Yeah, that's the point I was making. You can buy lenses with built-in shake reduction but they cost a lot more than lenses without it. The obvious advantage to having it in the body instead is that any lens you put on is stabilized.
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 03:27 AM
  #11  
Edmond's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 58
Default

I believe that Nikon and Canon have the most to offer in terms of lenses. SLR's are all about the lenses. Good lenses are rarely cheap so beware, it's a very addicting thing.

Personally, I'm a Nikon guy.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XB06
Scion xB 2nd-Gen ICE & Interior
15
Oct 1, 2022 10:24 PM
alexdrummerr30
Scion xB 2nd-Gen ICE & Interior
7
Sep 8, 2018 12:18 PM
Viper
Scion xB 2nd-Gen ICE & Interior
8
Oct 30, 2016 11:19 AM
motomatt
Scion iQ Owner's Lounge
1
Aug 17, 2015 01:32 PM
BBesco2021
Scion tC 2G ICE & Interior
1
Aug 13, 2015 03:23 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 PM.