17-40L or 16-35L II?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 15, 2012 | 11:34 AM

TheFantasticG

Thread Starter

Senior Member

SL Member

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 926

From: Tomball, Texas

17-40L or 16-35L II?

I'm leaning towards the 16-35 for the 2.8, but the 17-40L handles CA just a little bit better. I'm torn. I'll be using them on a 60D. Just looking for opinions from people who have used one or both lenses.

Nov 11, 2012 | 10:05 AM

TheFantasticG

Thread Starter

Senior Member

SL Member

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 926

From: Tomball, Texas

Just an update: I picked up a 17-40L for $580 local. Great walk around and landscape lens.

Apr 17, 2013 | 10:29 PM

salgadoimages

Senior Member

SL Member

Joined: Apr 2013

Posts: 120

From: San Diego, CA

Well, I guess i'm to late, I have both and was going to recommend the 17-40. For the price an awesome lens.

Reply Subscribe