Notices
Photography & Video A place to discuss and display cameras, equipment and photographs.

17-40L or 16-35L II?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2012, 11:34 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball, Texas
Posts: 926
Default 17-40L or 16-35L II?

I'm leaning towards the 16-35 for the 2.8, but the 17-40L handles CA just a little bit better. I'm torn. I'll be using them on a 60D. Just looking for opinions from people who have used one or both lenses.
TheFantasticG is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 10:05 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball, Texas
Posts: 926
Default

Just an update: I picked up a 17-40L for $580 local. Great walk around and landscape lens.
TheFantasticG is offline  
Old 04-17-2013, 10:29 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
salgadoimages's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 120
Default

Well, I guess i'm to late, I have both and was going to recommend the 17-40. For the price an awesome lens.
salgadoimages is offline  




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM.