Notices

Kiss the American Auto Industry Good-Bye

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #41  
evilBOXevil's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 616
From: Kitchen Stadium
Default

It says he bought it after his buyout at GM, but nowhere does it say that his buyout was that much money- or that he bought it with the buyout money. It does say that he was an elctrician with GM for 37 years, tho.

..which I guess your purpose is meant to imply:

1) GM, in its wonderful Humane tradition, has given its humble employees such huge buyouts as to allow them to pursue their richest fantasies.
or
2) GM has obviously paid this humble electrician WAY too much money over his 37 years, and that's why they're hurting now.
or both.

I'm happy for this man, but I don't see how this shows anything about GM, Ford, or Chryslers position.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #42  
Sly_dawg19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 297
From: Profile No Longer Exists
Default

American automotive industry is lacking because they pay Americans way more than the Japanese auto industry pays their workers. (just like all the other 500 posts above said )

Also because the quality and design of cars nowadays from america is less than par.

Also because they thought the SUV and Truck market would be enough to keep them alive. (Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra anyone? WAY better trucks )

What Detroit needs to do is either drop wages for assembly line jobs (how hard is an assembly line job, sounds BORING to me) Make safe reliable vehicles with less complex engines, mechanisms, etc.. (the less complicated, less likely to break) And get a hold in the tuner market and or young buyers market (Cars under 20,000)

If they can do all this above, they will be a strong competition for Foreign Automakers.

GM:
Pontiac needs to redesign the style of the GTO and or release a Firebird/Transam based of new Camaro.

Chevrolet needs to make 3 Camaros, an 18,000 RS version with V6 or even I4SuperCharged, a 26,000 Z28 edition with a V8, and a 35,000 SS Edition with a Supercharged V8. That would cover alot of market space.

Ford:
Ford needs to make a quality mustang, period. Same a Chevrolet with the 3 step program about the same prices.

Dodge:
Same for Challenger as with Ford and Chevrolet.

All the american automakers need to bring their signature cars at a low price with high quality!! People will buy the Camaro, simply because it is a Camaro, not because it is quality, or faster, or slower even.

They also need to make super cheap vehicles, like the cobalt should be only 14,000. Ford should make a fusion for 14,000 also, and Dodge needs to release the Demon with a base model of about 14,000 also.

This would help American automotive industry ALOT. But sadly, this most likely will not happen.. At least not for a few more years (like 5-15).
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 08:00 PM
  #43  
SF2K4's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 712
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Sly_dawg19
Also because they thought the SUV and Truck market would be enough to keep them alive. (Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra anyone? WAY better trucks )
Idunno... my mother's F-250 Super Duty Diesel is a beast... she pulls a horse trailer with it.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #44  
YourNameHere's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Exclusive
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,531
Default

ford sells what....1 million f150s per year...toyota is aiming for 150,000
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #45  
midtowndesi's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,215
From: Cupertino, CA
Default

My rusty piece of crap H2 hummer is the last american car i'm ever buying in my life. i've had so many american cars that were OK but after paying $65,000 in cash for my hummer, and being sooooo highly dissappointed, i'm never buying one again. the only people that will continue to buy american cars are stubborn hicks.

And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not ____ like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #46  
ggguy77's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 267
From: Warner Robins, GA
Default

This thread falls under the "Can of Worms" section. Mods please move it there.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #47  
kingsscion's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16
From: Kings Scion (OH)
Default

My vote is Toyota buys Ford scraps everything except the Heavy Duty Trucks and blows GM/Chrysler out of the water
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #48  
Teare's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by YourNameHere
bill ford hasnt taken a paycheck in a few months and wont do so until the company is profitable again...thats some good motivation.
Actually he hasn’t taken a check for at least 3 years.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #49  
Teare's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by Sly_dawg19
American automotive industry is lacking because they pay Americans way more than the Japanese auto industry pays their workers. (just like all the other 500 posts above said )
This is not true. What are you basing this pay scale on?
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #50  
Sly_dawg19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 297
From: Profile No Longer Exists
Default

when i have time il post wage differences, i have to leave for work..
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #51  
SF2K4's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 712
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by kingsscion
My vote is Toyota buys Ford scraps everything except the Heavy Duty Trucks and blows GM/Chrysler out of the water
Um... Mustang?
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 02:01 AM
  #52  
engifineer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,731
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Originally Posted by midtowndesi
My rusty piece of crap H2 hummer is the last american car i'm ever buying in my life. i've had so many american cars that were OK but after paying $65,000 in cash for my hummer, and being sooooo highly dissappointed, i'm never buying one again. the only people that will continue to buy american cars are stubborn hicks.

And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not poop like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
Well.. you did make a mistake there. The H2 is about the biggest pos suv you could buy. The military hummer has its share of issues (like being impossible to work on in the fiel) if you talk to some motorpool guys. The H2 is in no way, shape or form a hummer, it is an suv made to look like one for the most part.
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 02:12 AM
  #53  
redwar1441's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 569
Default

i personally know a few toyota techs that used to be gm techs at one point in their carear and now make 6 figures and usualy work half days. Toyota takes good care of its people imo.
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 02:54 AM
  #54  
YellowSubxB's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 133
Default

I've been seeing this dismantling of large American "smokestack" industries getting smaller each year. I am convinced that when the CEOs and Boards of Directors found that they couldn't bring the labor unions to their knees, they started investing more and more in foreigncompanies (GM -Toyota, Chrysler-Mitsubishi etc.) so they could close American plants, lay off union workers and still pull in profits trough their foreign affiliates. I predict that in the next 5 - 10 years we will see an explosion of foreign owned and managed factories here in the US, all with non-union employees. It's all part of globalization -bringing the US worker's salary and benefits down to a world wide average. We'll see how far it goes.
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 03:51 AM
  #55  
DriverXa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by redwar1441
i personally know a few toyota techs that used to be gm techs at one point in their carear and now make 6 figures and usualy work half days. Toyota takes good care of its people imo.
yes thats true, but if you work for a gm ford or chrysler dealer ur guarrantied work
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 04:02 AM
  #56  
midtowndesi's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,215
From: Cupertino, CA
Default

Originally Posted by engifineer
Originally Posted by midtowndesi
My rusty piece of crap H2 hummer is the last american car i'm ever buying in my life. i've had so many american cars that were OK but after paying $65,000 in cash for my hummer, and being sooooo highly dissappointed, i'm never buying one again. the only people that will continue to buy american cars are stubborn hicks.

And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not poop like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
Well.. you did make a mistake there. The H2 is about the biggest pos suv you could buy. The military hummer has its share of issues (like being impossible to work on in the fiel) if you talk to some motorpool guys. The H2 is in no way, shape or form a hummer, it is an suv made to look like one for the most part.
Regardless of whether or not I got the h2, escalade or denali = all these american trucks rust very quickly and within 5 years, they begin to have some serious problems as a result. if i had spent the same money on a mercedes g500 i would not be having this problem. and that's where the issue is. why can import car makers give you such a "quality" vehicle when for the same price, an american car gives you so much less? less reliability, more prone to rust, tons of electrical issues, etc.
- sh00k
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 04:20 AM
  #57  
DriverXa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 643
Default

^next time take a look underneath a gm truck. they have all these little stickers with barcodes that say "Made in China".
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 04:42 AM
  #58  
rdclark's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 466
From: Suburban Philadelphia
Default

A couple of points of interest:

1. Unions -- many people are blaming current high wages demanded by unions for the demise of the US auto industry. But it's not wages, necessarily. Consider "legacy costs:"

http://www.facsnet.org/tools/biz_econ/detroit_auto.php

A major portion of the “legacy costs” are health care – providing health-care benefits to a growing population of retired employees. In 1999, GM had legacy costs per vehicle of $527; Ford’s legacy costs were $304. In 2003, those costs had risen to $928 and $619 respectively. Figures for Chrysler weren’t available.
Say what you will about how it's the unions that piled those costs onto the carmakers, I don't see how they can just blow them off now. It's a rock and a hard place, and eventually only bankruptcy will resolve (though hardly "solve") the problem.

Toyota etc can compete in the US, paying their US workers competetive wages, in large part because they don't have these legacy costs to bear.

If there were a fair solution, it would probably have to be (1) renegotiate all current union contracts to reduce future legacy costs for the industry and then (2) mandate through legislation that all auotomobile manufacturers in the US must share all existing legacy costs equally, regardless of who first incurred them, until they are paid down to some pre-set level (through attrition). This would of course never fly, diplomatically.

If the world economy is an organism, then what's happening is simply evolution in action. Intelligent design only works on the future.

2. US vs The World

Chrysler before DB was the least international of the Big Three. GM and Ford are major players internationally, and have been for decades, both as manufacturers and as retailers. These companies sell more than a third of their product outside of the US, and manufacture an even larger percentage overseas. Chrysler before the merger was far less of a presence in foreign markets, and thus far more vulnerable to the Japanese onslaught in the US.

The fact is, we don't need Chrysler. We'll still have a Big Three, and the new #3 (Toyota) will be making millions of cars in the US and employing thousands of US workers. They will also be making millions of cars and employing thousands of workers all over the world, just as Ford and GM do. There are "American" cars that are made in Mexico and contain less than 30% US-sourced parts. There are "Japanese" cars made in the US out of over 90% US parts. The whole idea of "American" cars and "American" car makers is becoming obsolete.

Evolution in action. It's not just replacement, it's survival of the fittest. The new top predators are badder than the old ones. What, did somebody think that Chrysler got *stronger* when they absorbed American Motors and Jeep?

R
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 06:06 AM
  #59  
PapaWhiskey's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 38
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by evilBOXevil
The vast majority of American workers are not union, and I see prosperity all over the place. In the U.S. it costs automakers over $50/per hour in labor (wages, benefits, etc.) to build a car. In Japan it's around $22/hour, and in South Korea it's less than $5.00/hour. Why so much in America? Unions. They foster mediocrity, and protect bad workers, and are why so many companies are shipping manufacturing offshore.
I may be missing something here, but it sounds like your arguing that it's better for autoworkers to be paid somewhere between $5-$22 an hour...? Better for who? If you really beieve that autoworkers being paid less by any of the 'big3' would result in lower priced cars, or an improvement in the quality of product...Then I want to come live in your world of magical gingerbread houses and gumdrop candy mountains.

Ford is losing it's butt, yes. But they have openly stated that their losses were a planned part of their 'restructuring'. This 'restructuring' involves the largest auto parts manufacturing plant in the world- which opened 2 years ago in India. This 'restructuring' also involves massive auto assembly plants in China that have been tooling up and have had training from Ford for over 2 years now. Ford expects to have these things fully in production by the end of 2008. They have also openly stated that they fully expect to be profitable again by early 2009, and even claim that they will recover their losses by 2010! How will they recover billions and billions in 'planned' losses by 2010?
...By manufacturing cars at costs that are amazingly low, in other parts of the world- and then shipping them back and selling them at their normal price ranges. It's easy to imagine and project huge profits from a $23,000 car that cost you 1/4 of what it did to manufacture 3 years earlier.
The only problem I see for them is their market.... I wonder if anyone has questioned how to sell a car to a market that can no longer afford it? After all, the guy who used to make $50 an hour now makes between $5 and $22.
Yes, you did miss something. You missed that I DID NOT say that American autoworkers should makes between $5 and $22 per hour. It was a comparison to demonstrate the rediculous wages American autoworkers are paid. Is it not reasonable to assume that because the big 3 have to pay so much in wages, that they had to make it up in other areas such as lower quality materials? So who is to blame? Unions.
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #60  
SF2K4's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 712
From: Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Default

I understand the point of unions (to an extent) and wanting to keep jobs and all this stuff... but seriously, business is all about finding the way to do the best job (hopefully) possible for the smallest cost (why immigrant workers are "stealing" jobs... they work for lower wages. I'd hire them)... I don't know the current state of job positions at a factory, but it's the 21st century... sorry, barring tasks that NEED to be done by humans (and there are still plenty) most of the assembly can and should be done by robotic equipment. I'm sure by now it has to be much more reliable, cost efficient, and just overall a better choice.

Times change. You shouldn't get paid because of it.



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 PM.