Kiss the American Auto Industry Good-Bye
It says he bought it after his buyout at GM, but nowhere does it say that his buyout was that much money- or that he bought it with the buyout money. It does say that he was an elctrician with GM for 37 years, tho.
..which I guess your purpose is meant to imply:
1) GM, in its wonderful Humane tradition, has given its humble employees such huge buyouts as to allow them to pursue their richest fantasies.
or
2) GM has obviously paid this humble electrician WAY too much money over his 37 years, and that's why they're hurting now.
or both.
I'm happy for this man, but I don't see how this shows anything about GM, Ford, or Chryslers position.
..which I guess your purpose is meant to imply:
1) GM, in its wonderful Humane tradition, has given its humble employees such huge buyouts as to allow them to pursue their richest fantasies.
or
2) GM has obviously paid this humble electrician WAY too much money over his 37 years, and that's why they're hurting now.
or both.
I'm happy for this man, but I don't see how this shows anything about GM, Ford, or Chryslers position.
American automotive industry is lacking because they pay Americans way more than the Japanese auto industry pays their workers. (just like all the other 500 posts above said
)
Also because the quality and design of cars nowadays from america is less than par.
Also because they thought the SUV and Truck market would be enough to keep them alive. (Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra anyone? WAY better trucks
)
What Detroit needs to do is either drop wages for assembly line jobs (how hard is an assembly line job, sounds BORING to me) Make safe reliable vehicles with less complex engines, mechanisms, etc.. (the less complicated, less likely to break) And get a hold in the tuner market and or young buyers market (Cars under 20,000)
If they can do all this above, they will be a strong competition for Foreign Automakers.
GM:
Pontiac needs to redesign the style of the GTO and or release a Firebird/Transam based of new Camaro.
Chevrolet needs to make 3 Camaros, an 18,000 RS version with V6 or even I4SuperCharged, a 26,000 Z28 edition with a V8, and a 35,000 SS Edition with a Supercharged V8. That would cover alot of market space.
Ford:
Ford needs to make a quality mustang, period. Same a Chevrolet with the 3 step program about the same prices.
Dodge:
Same for Challenger as with Ford and Chevrolet.
All the american automakers need to bring their signature cars at a low price with high quality!! People will buy the Camaro, simply because it is a Camaro, not because it is quality, or faster, or slower even.
They also need to make super cheap vehicles, like the cobalt should be only 14,000. Ford should make a fusion for 14,000 also, and Dodge needs to release the Demon with a base model of about 14,000 also.
This would help American automotive industry ALOT. But sadly, this most likely will not happen.. At least not for a few more years (like 5-15).
)Also because the quality and design of cars nowadays from america is less than par.
Also because they thought the SUV and Truck market would be enough to keep them alive. (Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra anyone? WAY better trucks
)What Detroit needs to do is either drop wages for assembly line jobs (how hard is an assembly line job, sounds BORING to me) Make safe reliable vehicles with less complex engines, mechanisms, etc.. (the less complicated, less likely to break) And get a hold in the tuner market and or young buyers market (Cars under 20,000)
If they can do all this above, they will be a strong competition for Foreign Automakers.
GM:
Pontiac needs to redesign the style of the GTO and or release a Firebird/Transam based of new Camaro.
Chevrolet needs to make 3 Camaros, an 18,000 RS version with V6 or even I4SuperCharged, a 26,000 Z28 edition with a V8, and a 35,000 SS Edition with a Supercharged V8. That would cover alot of market space.
Ford:
Ford needs to make a quality mustang, period. Same a Chevrolet with the 3 step program about the same prices.
Dodge:
Same for Challenger as with Ford and Chevrolet.
All the american automakers need to bring their signature cars at a low price with high quality!! People will buy the Camaro, simply because it is a Camaro, not because it is quality, or faster, or slower even.
They also need to make super cheap vehicles, like the cobalt should be only 14,000. Ford should make a fusion for 14,000 also, and Dodge needs to release the Demon with a base model of about 14,000 also.
This would help American automotive industry ALOT. But sadly, this most likely will not happen.. At least not for a few more years (like 5-15).
Originally Posted by Sly_dawg19
Also because they thought the SUV and Truck market would be enough to keep them alive. (Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra anyone? WAY better trucks
)
)
My rusty piece of crap H2 hummer is the last american car i'm ever buying in my life. i've had so many american cars that were OK but after paying $65,000 in cash for my hummer, and being sooooo highly dissappointed, i'm never buying one again. the only people that will continue to buy american cars are stubborn hicks.
And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not ____ like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not ____ like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
Originally Posted by YourNameHere
bill ford hasnt taken a paycheck in a few months and wont do so until the company is profitable again...thats some good motivation.
Originally Posted by Sly_dawg19
American automotive industry is lacking because they pay Americans way more than the Japanese auto industry pays their workers. (just like all the other 500 posts above said
)
)
Originally Posted by midtowndesi
My rusty piece of crap H2 hummer is the last american car i'm ever buying in my life. i've had so many american cars that were OK but after paying $65,000 in cash for my hummer, and being sooooo highly dissappointed, i'm never buying one again. the only people that will continue to buy american cars are stubborn hicks.
And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not poop like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not poop like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
I've been seeing this dismantling of large American "smokestack" industries getting smaller each year. I am convinced that when the CEOs and Boards of Directors found that they couldn't bring the labor unions to their knees, they started investing more and more in foreigncompanies (GM -Toyota, Chrysler-Mitsubishi etc.) so they could close American plants, lay off union workers and still pull in profits trough their foreign affiliates. I predict that in the next 5 - 10 years we will see an explosion of foreign owned and managed factories here in the US, all with non-union employees. It's all part of globalization -bringing the US worker's salary and benefits down to a world wide average. We'll see how far it goes.
Originally Posted by redwar1441
i personally know a few toyota techs that used to be gm techs at one point in their carear and now make 6 figures and usualy work half days. Toyota takes good care of its people imo.
Originally Posted by engifineer
Originally Posted by midtowndesi
My rusty piece of crap H2 hummer is the last american car i'm ever buying in my life. i've had so many american cars that were OK but after paying $65,000 in cash for my hummer, and being sooooo highly dissappointed, i'm never buying one again. the only people that will continue to buy american cars are stubborn hicks.
And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not poop like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
And I hope no one takes my comments as being anti-american or anything of the sort. but when i pay $65,000 of my hard earned cash for a product, i want it to be a very good product and not poop like american cars are. i dont care if the car came from america, japan or fu/ckin' pluto - i want a quality product for the price i pay - and with american cars, you don't get that.
- sh00k
- sh00k
A couple of points of interest:
1. Unions -- many people are blaming current high wages demanded by unions for the demise of the US auto industry. But it's not wages, necessarily. Consider "legacy costs:"
http://www.facsnet.org/tools/biz_econ/detroit_auto.php
Say what you will about how it's the unions that piled those costs onto the carmakers, I don't see how they can just blow them off now. It's a rock and a hard place, and eventually only bankruptcy will resolve (though hardly "solve") the problem.
Toyota etc can compete in the US, paying their US workers competetive wages, in large part because they don't have these legacy costs to bear.
If there were a fair solution, it would probably have to be (1) renegotiate all current union contracts to reduce future legacy costs for the industry and then (2) mandate through legislation that all auotomobile manufacturers in the US must share all existing legacy costs equally, regardless of who first incurred them, until they are paid down to some pre-set level (through attrition). This would of course never fly, diplomatically.
If the world economy is an organism, then what's happening is simply evolution in action. Intelligent design only works on the future.
2. US vs The World
Chrysler before DB was the least international of the Big Three. GM and Ford are major players internationally, and have been for decades, both as manufacturers and as retailers. These companies sell more than a third of their product outside of the US, and manufacture an even larger percentage overseas. Chrysler before the merger was far less of a presence in foreign markets, and thus far more vulnerable to the Japanese onslaught in the US.
The fact is, we don't need Chrysler. We'll still have a Big Three, and the new #3 (Toyota) will be making millions of cars in the US and employing thousands of US workers. They will also be making millions of cars and employing thousands of workers all over the world, just as Ford and GM do. There are "American" cars that are made in Mexico and contain less than 30% US-sourced parts. There are "Japanese" cars made in the US out of over 90% US parts. The whole idea of "American" cars and "American" car makers is becoming obsolete.
Evolution in action. It's not just replacement, it's survival of the fittest. The new top predators are badder than the old ones. What, did somebody think that Chrysler got *stronger* when they absorbed American Motors and Jeep?
R
1. Unions -- many people are blaming current high wages demanded by unions for the demise of the US auto industry. But it's not wages, necessarily. Consider "legacy costs:"
http://www.facsnet.org/tools/biz_econ/detroit_auto.php
A major portion of the “legacy costs” are health care – providing health-care benefits to a growing population of retired employees. In 1999, GM had legacy costs per vehicle of $527; Ford’s legacy costs were $304. In 2003, those costs had risen to $928 and $619 respectively. Figures for Chrysler weren’t available.
Toyota etc can compete in the US, paying their US workers competetive wages, in large part because they don't have these legacy costs to bear.
If there were a fair solution, it would probably have to be (1) renegotiate all current union contracts to reduce future legacy costs for the industry and then (2) mandate through legislation that all auotomobile manufacturers in the US must share all existing legacy costs equally, regardless of who first incurred them, until they are paid down to some pre-set level (through attrition). This would of course never fly, diplomatically.
If the world economy is an organism, then what's happening is simply evolution in action. Intelligent design only works on the future.
2. US vs The World
Chrysler before DB was the least international of the Big Three. GM and Ford are major players internationally, and have been for decades, both as manufacturers and as retailers. These companies sell more than a third of their product outside of the US, and manufacture an even larger percentage overseas. Chrysler before the merger was far less of a presence in foreign markets, and thus far more vulnerable to the Japanese onslaught in the US.
The fact is, we don't need Chrysler. We'll still have a Big Three, and the new #3 (Toyota) will be making millions of cars in the US and employing thousands of US workers. They will also be making millions of cars and employing thousands of workers all over the world, just as Ford and GM do. There are "American" cars that are made in Mexico and contain less than 30% US-sourced parts. There are "Japanese" cars made in the US out of over 90% US parts. The whole idea of "American" cars and "American" car makers is becoming obsolete.
Evolution in action. It's not just replacement, it's survival of the fittest. The new top predators are badder than the old ones. What, did somebody think that Chrysler got *stronger* when they absorbed American Motors and Jeep?
R
Originally Posted by evilBOXevil
The vast majority of American workers are not union, and I see prosperity all over the place. In the U.S. it costs automakers over $50/per hour in labor (wages, benefits, etc.) to build a car. In Japan it's around $22/hour, and in South Korea it's less than $5.00/hour. Why so much in America? Unions. They foster mediocrity, and protect bad workers, and are why so many companies are shipping manufacturing offshore.
Ford is losing it's butt, yes. But they have openly stated that their losses were a planned part of their 'restructuring'. This 'restructuring' involves the largest auto parts manufacturing plant in the world- which opened 2 years ago in India. This 'restructuring' also involves massive auto assembly plants in China that have been tooling up and have had training from Ford for over 2 years now. Ford expects to have these things fully in production by the end of 2008. They have also openly stated that they fully expect to be profitable again by early 2009, and even claim that they will recover their losses by 2010! How will they recover billions and billions in 'planned' losses by 2010?
...By manufacturing cars at costs that are amazingly low, in other parts of the world- and then shipping them back and selling them at their normal price ranges. It's easy to imagine and project huge profits from a $23,000 car that cost you 1/4 of what it did to manufacture 3 years earlier.
The only problem I see for them is their market.... I wonder if anyone has questioned how to sell a car to a market that can no longer afford it? After all, the guy who used to make $50 an hour now makes between $5 and $22.
I understand the point of unions (to an extent) and wanting to keep jobs and all this stuff... but seriously, business is all about finding the way to do the best job (hopefully) possible for the smallest cost (why immigrant workers are "stealing" jobs... they work for lower wages. I'd hire them)... I don't know the current state of job positions at a factory, but it's the 21st century... sorry, barring tasks that NEED to be done by humans (and there are still plenty) most of the assembly can and should be done by robotic equipment. I'm sure by now it has to be much more reliable, cost efficient, and just overall a better choice.
Times change. You shouldn't get paid because of it.
Times change. You shouldn't get paid because of it.







