Notices

More Toyota Tundra Rumors Surface

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:02 PM
  #41  
scionofPCFL's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,409
From: Redneck Riveria
Default Re: gas?

Originally Posted by Kurenai
I hope they offer a manual, most of the people I know who are in that customer base want a manual. As for diesels, we're supposed to get them all around 08.

I'd love to rock a Tundra, but I dont do moon rovers.

You hear that Nissan, 410 horsepower, do your magic with the Titan!
That's because you're 16, and 16 y.o. don't buy $40,000 dollar rigs...on average. We old men do, and we don't like shifting anymore. There's a reason that GM went to Allison for their HD trucks...they make the best tranny in world, and it's auto.

Sticks are great for sports driving, but just a pain in the butt for towing. However, about 80% of 1/2 ton trucks are used as oversized luxury cars 80% of the time. And you don't have sticks in luxury cars either....except sport luxury cars.
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #42  
oldmanatee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,167
From: Center Point, AL
Default

The reason for diesel's popularity in Europe is huge tax breaks.
Right now, diesel runs at least .10 more a gallon in this area, the switch to Low Sulfur will only raise that, so don't expect a wave of oil burners on our streets.
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #43  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by oldmanatee
The reason for diesel's popularity in Europe is huge tax breaks.
Right now, diesel runs at least .10 more a gallon in this area, the switch to Low Sulfur will only raise that, so don't expect a wave of oil burners on our streets.
Thats true. I think if you look at the diesel popularities and split it according to country the ones with high gas taxes buy diesel the ones with lower gas tax buy more gas.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 12:11 AM
  #44  
Shakerhood's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 49
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by oldmanatee
The reason for diesel's popularity in Europe is huge tax breaks.
Right now, diesel runs at least .10 more a gallon in this area, the switch to Low Sulfur will only raise that, so don't expect a wave of oil burners on our streets.
Diesel run at or below the price of 87 Octane in my Area, the price may climb slightly after the switch, but if your gas mileage greatly increases, it will easily offset the extra few pennies. European Countries dont offer any tax breaks, they have huge tax on there fuel, that is one of the reasons why people choose Diesels.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 01:22 AM
  #45  
xSTANDxSTRONGx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team XcelsiA
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,570
From: 2002 Day Member (8-6-11)
Default

When I went to Italy, almost every car I saw was turbo diesel...and manual. I heard that the only people there that drive auto are the ones that have to, i.e. missing an arm or leg. also the gas prices (in december of last year) were about $6-$7 a gallon, I dint see diesel. I'd love a lil t/d car, esp when the price is about the same around here, diesel is even cheaper at some stations!
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 04:06 AM
  #46  
Shakerhood's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 49
From: Ohio
Default

Diesel runs usually runs anywhere from .10 less up to even with 87 Octane around here.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 05:09 AM
  #47  
Freudenfahrer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 79
From: League City, TX
Default

Originally Posted by oldmanatee
The reason for diesel's popularity in Europe is huge tax breaks.
Right now, diesel runs at least .10 more a gallon in this area, the switch to Low Sulfur will only raise that, so don't expect a wave of oil burners on our streets.
Maybe if you completely ignore the fact that diesels get much better gas mileage than gassers, then your statement would make sense. It's like the people that put regular gas in their premium cars to save money. Completely short-sighted.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 09:43 AM
  #48  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

i thought the corvette was a pushrod motor... ?
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #49  
oldmanatee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,167
From: Center Point, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Freudenfahrer
Originally Posted by oldmanatee
The reason for diesel's popularity in Europe is huge tax breaks.
Right now, diesel runs at least .10 more a gallon in this area, the switch to Low Sulfur will only raise that, so don't expect a wave of oil burners on our streets.
Maybe if you completely ignore the fact that diesels get much better gas mileage than gassers, then your statement would make sense. It's like the people that put regular gas in their premium cars to save money. Completely short-sighted.
The time it takes to amortize the price difference for the extra cost of a diesel does not make it a magic bullet. I wish we had more diesels, they have the same performance, or sometimes better than gas. But you can't completely ignore the fact that they cost more initially. With diesel running the same price as regular, how long would it take to outweigh the extra $2000 it takes to get one? It's not, check the diesel option and start saving big bucks is all I am trying to say.
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #50  
mandangalo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 468
From: Spokane, WA
Default

Originally Posted by JUMBO
The big difference is that our engine will be a LIGHT V8. Aluminum vs. Iron, guys.

More than likely, the 5.7L will use the same block as the 4.7L, just bored and stroked.
the 2uz and 1uz for that matter are iron block v8s.
Old Aug 19, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #51  
Shakerhood's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 49
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by oldmanatee
Originally Posted by Freudenfahrer
Originally Posted by oldmanatee
The reason for diesel's popularity in Europe is huge tax breaks.
Right now, diesel runs at least .10 more a gallon in this area, the switch to Low Sulfur will only raise that, so don't expect a wave of oil burners on our streets.
Maybe if you completely ignore the fact that diesels get much better gas mileage than gassers, then your statement would make sense. It's like the people that put regular gas in their premium cars to save money. Completely short-sighted.
The time it takes to amortize the price difference for the extra cost of a diesel does not make it a magic bullet. I wish we had more diesels, they have the same performance, or sometimes better than gas. But you can't completely ignore the fact that they cost more initially. With diesel running the same price as regular, how long would it take to outweigh the extra $2000 it takes to get one? It's not, check the diesel option and start saving big bucks is all I am trying to say.
The Diesel option is less than 2 Grand and the more it is in use the less the cost will be, plus the time you will gain back that up front money will not take very long as mileage is so much better with a Diesel. The Engine is also very heavy duty and will outlast a conventional engine, so your long term outlook would be even better.
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #52  
oldmanatee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,167
From: Center Point, AL
Default

All true... long term is the key...... But, how many folks keep a vehicle long term anymore?
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 04:42 AM
  #53  
Shakerhood's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 49
From: Ohio
Default

It would not take long to overcome the cost and I believe people are keeping cars longer than ever today. The longest I kept a Vehicle was 11 Years and would still have it if it did not get lost in an accident, right now I have had 2 since 2000 and 1 since 1998, all going strong.
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #54  
Smallz's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 11
From: Meadville, Pa
Default

I was at a truck course for toyota and one of the guys said that he couldn't say "officially" but the new truck engine was going to be about 425 HP. He would be the guy to know cause he has been working with the new trucks for a while now!
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 04:48 AM
  #55  
JUMBO's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 459
From: smarthomes chattanooga TN
Default

I get to drive the new Tundra tomorrow, but here's what I can tell you without getting into serious crap:

5.7L = dual VVT-i, ALL ALUMINUM, ALL NEW
10.5" diameter rear ring in the differential
0-60 in the 6.5 second range

More to follow if I can. They are pretty serious about this confidentiality stuff.

But seeing as how the truck will be at SEMA, I'm sure there will be more info prior to that, at at least then.
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #56  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by JUMBO
I get to drive the new Tundra tomorrow, but here's what I can tell you without getting into serious crap:

5.7L = dual VVT-i, ALL ALUMINUM, ALL NEW
10.5" diameter rear ring in the differential
0-60 in the 6.5 second range

More to follow if I can. They are pretty serious about this confidentiality stuff.

But seeing as how the truck will be at SEMA, I'm sure there will be more info prior to that, at at least then.
What bigger engine do they have on the way? Sounds more like a HD truck with that axle.
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #57  
JUMBO's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 459
From: smarthomes chattanooga TN
Default

You are exactly right on that one, emiller. The componentry on this truck matches or exceeds the specs on our competitors' HD/Super Duty stuff. There may be a diesel on the way, but the frame and drivetrain won't have to change much, if at all.
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 06:25 PM
  #58  
snowbuddytC's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 530
From: Chino Hills, CA
Default

wth !! 410 hp .. my 2002 has 245 what happened??

man i wish mine was 410 T_T sigh...
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 06:41 PM
  #59  
JUMBO's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 459
From: smarthomes chattanooga TN
Default

Independantly controlled Dual VVTi, 5.7L, and variable intake manifold happened.

And honestly, doesn't your 2002 feel like more than 245? It's cause it is, but Toyota is notoriously modest.
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #60  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by JUMBO
You are exactly right on that one, emiller. The componentry on this truck matches or exceeds the specs on our competitors' HD/Super Duty stuff. There may be a diesel on the way, but the frame and drivetrain won't have to change much, if at all.
Since Toyota doesnt have a huge truck production it would be smart to build something that fits the 1/2 up to 1 ton with as much common parts as possible. They just dont have the volume at this time to build multiple frames affordably. 10.5 with a diesel Id guess its a 3/4 ton with a lager gas engine.



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 AM.