Notices

Toyotas That Run on Ethanol and Flexible Fuels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #1  
allscion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 264
From: Arlington, Virginia USA
Default Toyotas That Run on Ethanol and Flexible Fuels

Here are two takes on this topic.

Paul
Allscion -- an e-commerce website with news and accessories for your Scion vehicles
http://www.allscion.com/store




http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/...ess/toyota.php

Toyota Motor, a pioneer in the development of popular gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, is considering a U.S. investment in cars that run on ethanol and other alternative fuels, according to the company's North America president, Jim Press.

"We're already developing vehicles that can operate in ethanol-rich Brazil," Press said Tuesday, "and we're optimistic that we can offer similar vehicles to American consumers."
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/...024310060.html

Working to burnish its environmentalist credentials, Toyota Motor Corp. said it is developing a hybrid vehicle that can travel greater distances on an electrical charge, and it will consider producing vehicles that can run on ethanol.

Toyota is already the leading producer of gasoline-electric hybrids, and a move to adopt more-advanced plug-in models would help keep the Japanese company in the lead. In the case of ethanol, the announcement represented a rare moment where Toyota is chasing Detroit on an energy initiative.

The move toward ethanol would be a shift in direction for Toyota, which hasn't produced any so-called flexible-fuel vehicles, which can run on either gasoline or a blend comprising 85% ethanol.

General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG have sold nearly six million of these vehicles, mostly because federal rules give them credit for each one in calculating compliance with fuel-economy rules.

Mr. Press noted that Toyota is already developing the flex-fuel vehicles for sale in Brazil, so it would be easy to do the same for this country. And the technology only costs a couple hundred dollars a vehicle.

A Toyota spokeswoman said the company has never built flex-fuel cars for sale in the U.S. because it didn't need the extra credit to meet federal mileage standards and because very few stations have ethanol pumps, meaning most of the flex-fuel cars are still fueled by gasoline anyway.
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #2  
paul34's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,320
Default

That's weird, earlier Toyota said reluctantly that they would only build flex-fuel vehicles if they saw the great need for it...
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #3  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

I thought something was posted here about 4 months ago that said in 2008 all Toy cars would run on E85?
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 12:31 AM
  #4  
JUMBO's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 459
From: smarthomes chattanooga TN
Default

E85 cars impact barely .02% of the world's dependance on petroleum. It looks good on TV, though.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #5  
LB11's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 21
From: Florida
Default

Its easier for auto manufacurers to make cars that can use regular fuel and e85 than it is for the oil companies to make gas stations with e85 and no cars to use them. Thats why it impacts such a small amount of the consumption. It has to start somewhere and the more cars on the road that can use the fuel, the more oil companies will look into making e85 fill up stations.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #6  
jhend924's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 50
Default

e85 is overrated....it reduces gas mileage by somewhere around 20%

the actual reason there is any incentive to do this is because it allows them to wiggle around the regulations on epa mpg....basically when a company reports to the epa they need to have a certain average in order to not pay hefty fines....e85 though allows them to report on only that 15% gasoline in the mixture so the mpg estimates on the gasoline portion skyrocket and it boosts that companies mpg average very easily...thats why GM is such a big proponent because it allows them to sneak past those requirements on trucks...why toyota needs this I dont know they may just want to do it for the image....
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
bBlover's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,564
From: Chino, CA
Default

If they do this, there needs to be more e85 pumps, I went online to look and there's only pumps on bases.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #8  
3min3m2's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,459
From: West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by jhend924
e85 is overrated....it reduces gas mileage by somewhere around 20%

the actual reason there is any incentive to do this is because it allows them to wiggle around the regulations on epa mpg....basically when a company reports to the epa they need to have a certain average in order to not pay hefty fines....e85 though allows them to report on only that 15% gasoline in the mixture so the mpg estimates on the gasoline portion skyrocket and it boosts that companies mpg average very easily...thats why GM is such a big proponent because it allows them to sneak past those requirements on trucks...why toyota needs this I dont know they may just want to do it for the image....
I've always heard that e85 imporves mileage, not just because its 15% gasoline either......ethanol burns hotter and cleaner then gas, so it can make more hp for less fuel=better mileage

there are some e85 stations around, and ethanol is running like 2 a gallon, better compared to 3 for gasolne....demand will come around, it's a temporary solution
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #9  
paul34's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,320
Default

ethanol has fewer BTU's than a gallon of conventional gasoline... butanol is lower too, but not as pathetically low (in comparison to gasoline). Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #10  
LB11's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 21
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by paul34
ethanol has fewer BTU's than a gallon of conventional gasoline... butanol is lower too, but not as pathetically low (in comparison to gasoline). Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
This is true.
While it does burn cleaner, it doesnt have the energy. So it does need more to make the same power in the same car.

While the mileage per gallon might be lower, the ethanol fuel will eventually be cheaper and it will be completely supplied from US sources. Thats the big benefit.

Look at brazil, since there 1970's fuel crisis (I think it was) they have been completely redoing the whole country to run off domestic ethanol produced by there sugar cane farms. I think last I heard in 10 more years they wont require ANY outside sources of fuel to run the cars OR homes.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #11  
io333's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 612
Default

All most cars require to run E85 is a sensor in the fuel line and a reflash of the ECU. Total cost per car to install during manufacture-- about a dollar.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #12  
koasterking's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 351
From: Hunterdon Co., NJ
Default

Where arethe E85 gas stations? lol There's no need to invest and produce a product if only a very small percent of the country is able to use it.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 10:45 PM
  #13  
emiller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by koasterking
Where arethe E85 gas stations? lol There's no need to invest and produce a product if only a very small percent of the country is able to use it.
I dont know about the east coast but they have stations in the midwest. Mainly in larger cities.
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 11:36 PM
  #14  
jhend924's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 50
Default

eventually is a very generic term....bear in mind that while given a proper amount of time to support the production and storing of the quantities needed to support our usage.....that proper amount of time has got to be well beyond 10-15 years or more....in that time frame technology should be well beyond the need for ethanol....and chance are ethanol prices will not drop below that of gasoline for a long long time because gasoline prices in the short term are not set by oil prices or anything of that nature they are set by supply and demand....so you can pretty safely bet the same people setting the gasoline prices will be setting the e85 prices as well...as high as they think we are willing to pay for it

e85 does not generate as much energy as said so more will be required to burn to create the same force, hence the 20% mpg deficiency....from what i understand though performance is not harmed at all.
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #15  
paul34's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,320
Default

Originally Posted by io333
All most cars require to run E85 is a sensor in the fuel line and a reflash of the ECU. Total cost per car to install during manufacture-- about a dollar.
Don't they need to redo the lines and tank to be able to handle the different chemistry of a dominately ethanol-based fuel? Or is the current materials used enough?

I agree, it doesn't cost much, but it still does require some changes
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #16  
Djbombsquad's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 562
Default

bio dieseal
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 01:00 AM
  #17  
Generik420's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 167
From: Indianapolis (Naptown)
Default

Originally Posted by paul34
Originally Posted by io333
All most cars require to run E85 is a sensor in the fuel line and a reflash of the ECU. Total cost per car to install during manufacture-- about a dollar.
Don't they need to redo the lines and tank to be able to handle the different chemistry of a dominately ethanol-based fuel? Or is the current materials used enough?

I agree, it doesn't cost much, but it still does require some changes
Ethanol is caustic to standard gasoline lines and with prolonged use will destroys those lines from everything I have read. Also there have been reports I have read that Indiana has plans for 12 ethanol production plants to be built in the near future. Currently there is one ethanol production facility here in Indiana and it is estimated to produce 100million gallons a year. By that rationale, ethanol will get much cheaper.

Lastly, doesn't the IRL use E85 in the Indy cars?
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 01:14 PM
  #18  
jhend924's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 50
Default

if you figure that there will still be limited places to get them and the cars available to get them will increase the demand will increase greatly somewhere along the line...and if you factor in the 100million gallons a year works out to say 300k gallons per day...which seems like a lot....except when compared to the something like 250-300 MILLION GALLONS of gasoline per day used....thats not a whole lot...now add those 12 other plants meaning 1.2 billion per year....is about 4 million per day....which still only makes that around 1% of total consumption....

i dont see this getting much cheaper than gasoline anytime soon....although i do like the idea of reducing our dependence on middle eastern oil even .1%
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 01:51 PM
  #19  
grenerdXb's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Default

i sell cars.... and i can tell you that E85 is a good idea but right now it is terrible... it costs more than gas and you are looking at losing 30% of your gas mileage. not to mention that out of 165,000 yes.... one hundred and sixty five thousand gas stations, there are only 685 E85 compatable stations nationwide that is only .415% of the entire US... now i am in the midwest and we have 2 gas stations, that's it, so you can do the math yourselves and see that this system, although a step in the right direction for detroit, is still very very flawed and inefficient at this point in time.
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #20  
mfbenson's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 684
From: Somewhere, USA
Default

Ethanol is not currently economical for consumers because of the 50 cent a gallon tarriff on ethanol (allegedly meant as a benefit for corn farmers, but really a benefit for big oil). Ethanol would cost less than gas without that tarriff. If Congress really gave a rats ___ about the air quality they'd get rid of that tax.

Compounding the problem for consumers is that mileage with ethanol is worse than gasoline.

Despite that, its still better for the environment than gasoline because the emissions are vastly better than gasoline, and the refining process to make ethanol is better for the environment too.

Biodiesel does not have these problems, and it works with any existing diesel engine (although if your diesel is not fresh off the dealer's lot you will need a new fuel filter - the biodiesel acts like a solvent and tends to clean all the sludge off the bottom of the fuel tank) and both its tailpipe emmissions and refining emmisions are better.

Right now most ethanol is made from corn, but there is a new celluosic ethanol that can be made from the whole stalks of corn - stalks, leaves, cobs, the whole thing. Considering that this corn is not for human consumption, there's also a savings in that no pesticides or fertilizers are needed.

With widespread biodiesel and ethanol use, the US could be fully petroleum-independent. What we've got left in the ground is enough. Not to mention Canada is sitting on vast untapped oil sands. The production capacity is not really there (with oil sands, its more like a mining operation than a drilling operation) but at an economical extraction rate, what's there will last a century or so.

Considering that this is an auto enthusiast's forum, resistance to these new technologies (clean fuels, hybrids, etc) will be high. When the day comes that someone in a hybrid ethanol-electric starts to win drag races against gas-powered cars, the attitudes will change in a hurry.

Build a better mousetrap...



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:59 AM.