Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Emanage for N/A setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 03:41 AM
  #1  
bobbystc88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
From: So-Cal
Default Emanage for N/A setup?

I am thinking about getting a Emanage Blue to tune my car. I am not turbo and do not plan on going turbo... Is it really worth getting. Do you know what kind of gain to expect. Jet Performance has a reflash that adds approx 12whp. Dont know what to do.
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 03:56 AM
  #2  
Jiggaman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Big Sky Scion
Scikotics
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,123
From: -
Default

engine management is primarily used for boosted motors(im assuming you know that)

i would say gettin a new management system is not worth it unless you are boosted...
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 03:59 AM
  #3  
bobbystc88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
From: So-Cal
Default

ya i know but i have a guy in my club that said that his car was running lean with just the normal n/a mods and dyno'd at approx 140 then installed the emanage blue to help with that fuel that air ration and re dyno'd and was at 175
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 05:05 AM
  #4  
hawgs74's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,447
From: Conway, AR
Default

Originally Posted by bobbystc88
ya i know but i have a guy in my club that said that his car was running lean with just the normal n/a mods and dyno'd at approx 140 then installed the emanage blue to help with that fuel that air ration and re dyno'd and was at 175
I can see that
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #5  
bkuhl's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 780
From: Clovis, NM
Default

In order to actually justify getting engine management you would need to have done alot of engine work, period. Slapping on your standard I/H/E/P does not change the the characteristics of the system enough to require it. You may be able to squeeze out one to two horsepower, tops, without building the block up.
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #6  
Mid_Life_tC-risis's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 493
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Actually, this guy got over 175whp with just bolt-ons and Camcon:

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...547&highlight=

There are definitely nice gains to be had n/a with fuel management after adding I/H/E breathing mods. It's up to you to decide if it's worth the cost of EMS + tuning, unless you can somehow swing free time on the dyno. In my area, dyno time with a tuner is about $125/hr, depending on how long it takes the $$ can really pile up.
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #7  
Jiggaman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Big Sky Scion
Scikotics
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,123
From: -
Default

well i think about it this way: even if you do get that extra 35 hp from the management system, are you going to want to stop there?

you would already have one of the more expensive parts for a boost application. and then 2000 bucks for a supercharger to put some real power down, although i would MUCH rather go turbo then super.

But then there are bigtime warranty issues of course...

im gonna keep my eye on this one, let us know how it turns out if you do end up getting emanage
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #8  
bobbystc88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
From: So-Cal
Default

I dont want to go turbo i have a couple guys in my club that have turbos and have had problems. There is only one guy that has the GReddy turbo and he doesnt push his car nor is it getting as much power but he has had no problems. 60hp for supercharger i dont think is worth it.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 02:30 AM
  #9  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

Why the eternal; turbo vs. NA thread. He just wants to go NA, let him have fun. Not too many people want to go that route. Kudos on that.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #10  
xCxHxRxIxSx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 226
From: Iowa
Default

camcon would be you best bet . people have noticed big gains NA with it . it lets you clean up you af ratio and tune your cams lift from +20 deg to -20 deg camcon is you best bet
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #11  
caveman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
1UP Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,044
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by xCxHxRxIxSx
camcon would be you best bet . people have noticed big gains NA with it . it lets you clean up you af ratio and tune your cams lift from +20 deg to -20 deg camcon is you best bet

That would be cool if our motors actually worked on lift and not timing...
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #12  
bkuhl's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 780
From: Clovis, NM
Default

yep, it sure would!

I've got 172hp to the wheels with i/h/e... not hooked up to the e-manage ultimate yet. It's installed but not plugged in to the ECU.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #13  
xCxHxRxIxSx's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 226
From: Iowa
Default

you can change timing of cams with it .. my bad for not saying it .. but it really is the best thing for na setup .
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #14  
tuffCookie's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 476
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by bkuhl
yep, it sure would!

I've got 172hp to the wheels with i/h/e... not hooked up to the e-manage ultimate yet. It's installed but not plugged in to the ECU.

how'd u manage 172 WHP on just I/H/E?? do you have other work done like port and polish head?

i always read that 160 WHP is a more realistic figure for just I/H/E.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #15  
caveman's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
1UP Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,044
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by tuffCookie
Originally Posted by bkuhl
yep, it sure would!

I've got 172hp to the wheels with i/h/e... not hooked up to the e-manage ultimate yet. It's installed but not plugged in to the ECU.

how'd u manage 172 WHP on just I/H/E?? do you have other work done like port and polish head?

i always read that 160 WHP is a more realistic figure for just I/H/E.

Ive been readin 160 is bout average to for I/H/E, thats basically wat im running now hopefully ill get it on the dyno within a couple weeks....so we shall see...

A FIC is in order as well as i begin to get parts to go boost, but i wanna see how far i can take the car N/A...not much i know but i would just like to test it...
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #16  
Mid_Life_tC-risis's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 493
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by tuffCookie
Originally Posted by bkuhl
yep, it sure would!

I've got 172hp to the wheels with i/h/e... not hooked up to the e-manage ultimate yet. It's installed but not plugged in to the ECU.

how'd u manage 172 WHP on just I/H/E?? do you have other work done like port and polish head?

i always read that 160 WHP is a more realistic figure for just I/H/E.
Agreed. 160 is realistic maximum for I/H/E untuned. That dyno might be uncorrected.
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #17  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

Originally Posted by Mid_Life_tC-risis
Originally Posted by tuffCookie
Originally Posted by bkuhl
yep, it sure would!

I've got 172hp to the wheels with i/h/e... not hooked up to the e-manage ultimate yet. It's installed but not plugged in to the ECU.

how'd u manage 172 WHP on just I/H/E?? do you have other work done like port and polish head?

i always read that 160 WHP is a more realistic figure for just I/H/E.
Agreed. 160 is realistic maximum for I/H/E untuned. That dyno might be uncorrected.
Realistic numbers can go all the way to 16x. No more than 168whp. I saw a dyno once like that, no tuning involved.
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #18  
bobbystc88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
From: So-Cal
Default

mine on the dyno in 97 degree heat with aem intake/ dc headers and hks axle back was only 154whp. they said to add about 5whp in cooler wheather. i am waiting to dyno again after i get my invidia s-pipe i just hope it lines up good with the headers. i have already installed my zpi pulley so cant wait to see what happens.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vi3tb0i09
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
2
Sep 23, 2015 08:32 PM
Subaru86
Scion FR-S Owner's Lounge
0
Sep 14, 2015 12:51 PM
xBrelease08
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Wheel & Tire
2
Sep 13, 2015 04:39 PM
dbg326
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Suspension & Handling
0
Aug 28, 2015 05:18 PM
5N1PE5
Scion tC 2G Owners Lounge
4
Aug 3, 2015 11:25 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 PM.