Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Example of why not to go by peak gain #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default Example of why not to go by peak gain #'s

If you've ever read a performance part's features and saw an advertised gain of Xhp and Xtorque and made your decision on that along, here's why not to.

This is just an example of a performance part (DC Sports 4-1 header) for the tC. I didn't choose this product because of its brand or anything other than making a point.

I did an overlay of the dyno graphs they provided and here's what I came up with:



Now you can visually tell that there is almost nothing at the bottom end (2krpm or so) but take a look at 3krpm and the gap between the red torque curve (DC Sports) and the blue torque curve (OEM). There is quite a visual difference from there all the way to redline. Think of this in terms of a drag race.

1st gear - launch at whatever rpms and go from 2-3krpm up to redline
2nd gear - shift into 2nd with rpms at 3krpm (or so) and continue to redline
3rd gear - shift into 3rd with again rpms at 3krpm (or so) and continue to redline
etc. etc.
As you could imagine, spending the most time in the areas with high gains is what you're looking for if you're wanting to race. These areas are what you're looking to add to.

Where the peak gain numbers can be misleading is that it can take away from certain areas and have a very peaky area of power (i.e. remove low end torque only to add high end hp (5krpm-6.3krpm)).

This is how some companies sell their products... Advertise 15hp gains but in reality the product shifts the power by giving in certain places and taking from elsewhere.

Bottom line, do your research. Ask for dyno charts with mods listed and environmental factors listed BEFORE you buy your product or don't complain when you don't get your money's worth.

Use your knowledge of the pwoer curves to combine parts that will be helping each other instead of contradicting each other. Stay away from manufacturers who do NOT answer questions you have for them and their products.

This has been a "Bored on a Saturday" production LOL

-Matty-tC
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
kungpaosamuraiii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,726
Default

It's actually a 4-2-1 header. That's what I love about AEM and DC; they go for what's useful, not for the most. AEM's intake, if it comes into existence, will have the same max power as the others but supposedly 90% of their R&D goes into making power in the middle of the RPM band.

Good find.

No loss of power anywhere, good to know.
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #3  
tc05's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 151
From: Chicago
Default

Good find also, but to bad it sets off your CEL
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #4  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

tc05: i made this thread for a general reference in researching and purchasing performance parts. i wasn't highlighting the dc header for any other reason than they did good r&d and have proven it with their dyno sheets.

but to fix your problem, pick up one of these:
http://clubsciontc.com/ccproduct.php?productid=1009

put it in place of where you o2 sensor is now and put your o2 sensor into it and you will fix the CEL problem
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 04:49 PM
  #5  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

Originally Posted by kungpaosamuraiii
It's actually a 4-2-1 header.
Yeah that caption was on the sheet from DC/AEM. I didn't add it.

I believe the Alphawerks header would be a nice 4-1 that should have dyno sheets like this so people can see though ;)
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 06:15 AM
  #6  
kungpaosamuraiii's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,726
Default

Yea, crazy companies posting the wrong stuff about their own products.

It's because it's a race-only header and almost all of DC's headers that are race-only are 4-1 designs.

Alphaworks doesn't have the same amount of power down low. The difference is negligible in racing though.
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #7  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

useable power and dyno power are different beasts
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 01:47 PM
  #8  
Joe_Dezod's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,912
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

If you're redlining when you shift, you end up closer to 4-4.5k depending on the gear. I have an Alphawerks header and Blitz exhaust. It FLYS through 1st and 2nd gear. My friend has a 97GSX runing 12s and he hasn't been in my car since the mods (Lives in FL). He came back for the weekend and said it felt much faster on the top-end since the last time we beat on it. I'm racing this Wednesday if the weather holds up. Debating on what kind of weight reduction I can do to make up for the wing, 18s, and body kit haha...
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #9  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

pull off the wing, get some lightweight 17's, and remove the body kit LOL
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #10  
tc05's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 151
From: Chicago
Default

Matty, no pun intended i was just stating it set off the cel, and thanks for the non fouler advice as soon as i get the money im going to get the dc headers and the non foulers, but one question do i just put it on the o2 sensor that goes into the header or both?
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #11  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

you put the antifouler on the o2 sensor bung and screw the o2 sensor into the antifouler
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #12  
RA31925's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 398
Default

on the s pipe. the sensor on the header is the air fuel sensor not the O2. when you goto pepboys its in the help section. part number is 42002 or 42009. you want to use the one that has a gasket and not the tapered one.
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #13  
tc05's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 151
From: Chicago
Default

so when i open up my hood its not the sensor i first see right? so im guessing its below the car, sorry for noob question but i didnt have to worry about the Cel problem in my eclipse the Greddy headers didnt set it off, any pic's?
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 09:35 PM
  #14  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

Originally Posted by chicago_guy
on the s pipe. the sensor on the header is the air fuel sensor not the O2. when you goto pepboys its in the help section. part number is 42002 or 42009. you want to use the one that has a gasket and not the tapered one.
doh
thanks for clarification
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #15  
Diluvium's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 760
Default

i got DC headers with anti-fouler installed, and NO CEL.

alot of people say a resistor chip also helps prevent the CEL to come on.. thats what i got too.... drive this tC for 2000miles already and no CEL.

i like my headers. i notice differences with my header, damper kit, and chip. except my intake, its just there for sound...haha
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #16  
tc05's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 151
From: Chicago
Default

ok thansk for clarifying
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #17  
turbo2liter's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 219
From: Indiana
Default

There is always a tradeoff. When you open up the exhaust ports or header, you are going to give up power down low to flow up high. It's physics, the scavenging effect. There is a middle ground to satisfy you, but it won't be the best of both worlds.. it will be "half" of both worlds.

Same with turbo kits. You put a big16g on a 2.4, we (DSM world) have already proven how high it will rev on what boost. If your heads flow better than ours, then your limit will be lower than ours. When you go to a bigger turbo, you get more power, but takes longer to spool.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #18  
kocho333's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 351
Default

interesting...so which header would u guys recomend...sry but i dont have too much free time to search; alpha, dc, or Megan???...and i was going to do a fully custom exhaust, including s pipe, so let me know wat u guys think thanx
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 08:49 PM
  #19  
matty-tC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,045
Default

i'm purchasing an alpha
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #20  
Joe_Dezod's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,912
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default

Alphawerks all the way. It looks as good as it performs and the welds are PERFECT.

Just make sure you wipe the entire header down with alcohol after the install (and before you start it) or it will stain from the heat (caused by grease from your fingers).



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:18 PM.