Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Making the trd muffler a complete exhaust???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
tckurt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 762
Default Making the trd muffler a complete exhaust???

I am curious to how well performance would be if I added custom piping from the muffler to the s-pipe or would it be better to buy the creativecompacts exhaust? Has anyone else done this yet and dynoed it...any info would be nice.
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 04:35 AM
  #2  
bambams247's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 341
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

I want to do a complete 2.5 inch header-back custom bent exhaust with a nur spec muffler in a few weeks! I'll post up pics plus info!
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 06:08 AM
  #3  
reagulator's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 946
From: Garden Grove, CA
Default

2.5 sounds like overkill to me. Im no expert though
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
SupaWhiteTc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
Default

No way! 2.5"-3.0" is optimum for the displacement of the TC's engine. Scion Speed told me they actually showed bigger gains with the 3" S-Pipe back on an NA car then the 2.5" did. But I have 2.5" and I wish I had gone with 3" because it would have been a little bit deeper sounding.
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
tckurt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 762
Default

How much would it cost to get aluminum piping from axle back to s pipe in 3"?
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #6  
ty6's Avatar
ty6
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by tckurt
How much would it cost to get aluminum piping from axle back to s pipe in 3"?
...and where would you find it?
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #7  
tckurt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 762
Default

any place that does exhaust work carries metal pipings to custom fit to a vehicle.
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:42 PM
  #8  
ty6's Avatar
ty6
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
Default

it's that easy? So you'd probably just call them up for pricing then as well?
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #9  
tckurt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 762
Default

Are you trying to be a smart ___? Anyways has anybody had any experience with purchasing custom exhaust piping?
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #10  
ty6's Avatar
ty6
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
Default

NO...I'm being serious. Relax! I just put 2 + 2 together. If you can get the piping from "any place that does exhaust work", then they would probably have the pricing.

I'm interested in the same thing.
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 02:42 AM
  #11  
Souljah347's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 859
Default

Originally Posted by SupaWhiteTc
No way! 2.5"-3.0" is optimum for the displacement of the TC's engine. Scion Speed told me they actually showed bigger gains with the 3" S-Pipe back on an NA car then the 2.5" did. But I have 2.5" and I wish I had gone with 3" because it would have been a little bit deeper sounding.
really? i thought 3" would be way to big but then again i'm no expert
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 02:58 AM
  #12  
randode's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Wagonistas
SL Member
iTrader: (-2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,353
From: Holding the detonator
Default

Originally Posted by SupaWhiteTc
Scion Speed told me they actually showed bigger gains with the 3" S-Pipe back on an NA car then the 2.5" did.
by NA do you mean naturally aspirated? The tC is not naturally aspirated, its fuel injected.
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:07 AM
  #13  
xAlex's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 319
From: Babylon, NY
Default

Originally Posted by randode
The tC is not naturally aspirated, its fuel injected.
i always thought NA meant no forced induction, ie: turbo or supercharged. someone wanna try explaining naturally aspirated to me :?
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:14 AM
  #14  
English's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 703
From: Atl
Default

Originally Posted by randode
Originally Posted by SupaWhiteTc
Scion Speed told me they actually showed bigger gains with the 3" S-Pipe back on an NA car then the 2.5" did.
by NA do you mean naturally aspirated? The tC is not naturally aspirated, its fuel injected.
xAlex is right, NA or naturally aspirated does mean that it does not have forced induction(ie turbo or sc), regardless if it is fuel injected or carburated....
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:16 AM
  #15  
niguels's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 133
From: Dillon, SC
Default

Originally Posted by randode
Originally Posted by SupaWhiteTc
Scion Speed told me they actually showed bigger gains with the 3" S-Pipe back on an NA car then the 2.5" did.
by NA do you mean naturally aspirated? The tC is not naturally aspirated, its fuel injected.
Hey Sponsor, Naturally Aspirated doesn't have anything to do with the fuel feeding system.

Naturally Aspirated means the way the air gets into your combustion chamber, in this case the vacuum created by the descending movement of the piston is what gets the air trough the intake manyfold and into the cylinder.

When a car is not Naturally Aspirated, it means that some kind of forced admission is used, the possible options are: supercharger or turbocharger, in which case you say that the engine is Supercharged or Turbocharged.

Please, be sure of your comments before posting. Otherwise, you will only spread confusion trough the forum.

Niguels - ME
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:20 AM
  #16  
randode's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Wagonistas
SL Member
iTrader: (-2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,353
From: Holding the detonator
Default

i stand corrected.
carry on then...
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:23 AM
  #17  
bambams247's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 341
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

The question is would you consider a nitrous-ed engine a non NA system. Thats where the you lay in between the crack..
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:24 AM
  #18  
reagulator's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 946
From: Garden Grove, CA
Default

Originally Posted by randode
Originally Posted by SupaWhiteTc
Scion Speed told me they actually showed bigger gains with the 3" S-Pipe back on an NA car then the 2.5" did.
by NA do you mean naturally aspirated? The tC is not naturally aspirated, its fuel injected.
boy, i hope you know more about lights than what you know about cars
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:28 AM
  #19  
English's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 703
From: Atl
Default

Originally Posted by bambams247
The question is would you consider a nitrous-ed engine a non NA system. Thats where the you lay in between the crack..
No because it adds more oxygen molecules in to the combustion chamber
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 03:32 AM
  #20  
reagulator's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 946
From: Garden Grove, CA
Default

If the intake has negative boost (aka vacuum) then it is NA(natuarally aspirated). if it has positive boost then it is FI(forced induction)

Nitrous systems still run on a vacuum therefore it is NA



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 PM.