Notices
Scion tC 1G Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

Regular Gas is Recommended. Use it!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2009, 06:16 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Default

Hahaha, watch this.

I put 93 octane in my old tC for one tank of gas and I got 11 MPG. I guess since I got such bad gas mileage, that's proof that 93 isn't as good as 87.

^ That's as credible as everything else in this thread, 93 octane related.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 06:22 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
ahatch133's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 952
Default

sometimes i like to put pre-mix in maby some diesel. give it a little more tourqes lol
ahatch133 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 06:23 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Default

Oh ____, definitely. Diesel adds 400 tork. Look at all those trucks running diesel, they're beasts!
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 06:44 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ack154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Hahaha, watch this.

I put 93 octane in my old tC for one tank of gas and I got 11 MPG. I guess since I got such bad gas mileage, that's proof that 93 isn't as good as 87.

^ That's as credible as everything else in this thread, 93 octane related.
ack154 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 06:54 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Default

Originally Posted by ack154
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Hahaha, watch this.

I put 93 octane in my old tC for one tank of gas and I got 11 MPG. I guess since I got such bad gas mileage, that's proof that 93 isn't as good as 87.

^ That's as credible as everything else in this thread, 93 octane related.
I feel honored to be bowed down to by the all knowing Ack.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:01 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Domo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,006
Default

caranddriver

You might want to add that to your list. I felt compelled to show you this as I did more research. "We should note that even cars designed to run on regular fuel might require higher octane as they age." But none the less it supports what you are trying to get across. Pretty interesting.
Domo is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:33 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Default

Originally Posted by Domo
Fail.

Our tests confirm that for most cars there is no compelling reason to buy more expensive fuel than the factory recommends, as any performance gain realized will surely be far less than the percentage hike in price.
You just provided proof that validates the purpose of this thread.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:37 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ack154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Originally Posted by Domo
caranddriver

You might want to add that to your list. I felt compelled to show you this as I did more research. "We should note that even cars designed to run on regular fuel might require higher octane as they age." But none the less it supports what you are trying to get across. Pretty interesting.
That's a good one actually with some real results. Thanks.
ack154 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:39 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ack154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Originally Posted by Domo
Fail.
Ya, his URL is correct, but the forum now awesomely throws in some extra code with links and I think it borked this one. Thanks IB!

Copy/Paste FTW: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ts+page-2.html
ack154 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:43 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Default

I Googled it. Skipped to the end where it basically says that it's a waste of money to run premium in a car that doesn't recommend it.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:48 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ack154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Originally Posted by Domo
You just provided proof that validates the purpose of this thread.
He knows that part... he was just pointing out the part about the older cars...
ack154 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:50 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CarbonXe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Default

Yea I know, but the tC is about 10-15 years too young to be considered an 'older car'.
CarbonXe is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 12:36 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
NYNCTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CYN
Posts: 6,458
Default

true, i have gone back and forth btw premium and regular just to see the difference and there is none. ill just save the extra dollar or two and run regular. unless someone shows me some diffinitive proof that the na tc will run better with 91, then ill use it again, but until then, why waste the money.
NYNCTC is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 05:43 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
SL Member
 
dirtyblonde13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 583
Default

it makes me feel better thats why!
dirtyblonde13 is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 02:16 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
tcCALI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,231
Default

^ ahha did you read up on any of the links the OP posted?
tcCALI is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:38 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Scinergy
Team ScioNRG
 
Mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 5280
Posts: 2,569
Default Re: Regular Gas is Recommended. Use it!

Originally Posted by ack154
I see many people come on here talking about how they run premium gas in their stock/NA tC and I hang my head in shame a little lower each time. Our manual recommends regular fuel, 87 octane. Why would you run any higher? Do you just want to throw money away? You're not getting any real benefit from it and if you think you are, it's all in your head. Run 87. It's what your car wants.

Now if you're boosted... turbo or supercharged, you should be running Premium (at least 91, I believe). But that is a whole different story and this is all directed at the NA people though.

Originally Posted by Kiplinger
The premium myth

One thing's for sure -- if your owner's manual doesn't recommend premium, you're wasting your money if you use it. You simply can't buy extra performance.

In fact, because it's harder to ignite, the higher-octane gas could make your car harder to start and run less smoothly, especially as the weather turns colder.
Our manual says the following (pg 234 for 2005MY and pg 236 for 2006MY):

Originally Posted by Manual
Unleaded gasoline, Octane Rating 87 (Research Octane Number 91) or higher.
No, this does not mean 91 is actually recommended or ideal. The 91 is just another type of rating system used to determine the pump rating... explained here:

Originally Posted by jmiller20874
"Research Octane" is just one of two numbers used to determine "pump octane".

If you look at the gas pump, under the octane number it should say "Determined by the (R+M)/2 method". The "R" in the formula is the "Research Octane Number", the "M" is the "Motor Octane Number".

So if it says that to use 91 RON the MON would be at 83 hence (91 RON + 83 MON)/2 = 87 Pump Octane
Taken from here: https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=76399

Further Reading:
- http://tinyurl.com/c3dgoe (caranddriver.com link borked by the forum)
- http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...emiumgas_x.htm
- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25691323/
- http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/car...4/car1105.html
- http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...nd-regular-gas
- http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/...s_premium.html
- http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/cons...s/aut12.shtmjj
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating
- http://www.google.com

* NOTE: If you switch back to regular from Premium, it is possible you could have a rough idle or something for the first tank. I don't know if this is true or not, but thought I'd throw it out here in case someone switched back to regular and wanted to come on here and complain that it's hurting their car now.
Sorry to include this longer quote from the initial post in this thread.... I just wanted to add my 2 cents for what it's worth....
True....there is not a substantial difference between the 87 grade octane fuel and say the premium fuel (91 or 93 depending on the state).... However...this is my 2 cents.... there are a few fuel supplier companies such as Shell, that does make it an advantage especially in the winter months to run premium blend. They are one of just a few companies that I know of that if you purchase the premium that is the one grade of fuel that they do NOT dilute with ethanol. Hence... it is worth the extra few cents a gallon because you get normal gas mileage...and not the crappy mileage that ethanol induced grades. I literally get an extra 80 miles out of every tank using premium...which more than pays for the initial cost at the pump.
Mouse is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:42 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Scinergy
Team ScioNRG
 
Mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 5280
Posts: 2,569
Default

other than what I just posted above... the only other advantage of running a higher octane fuel is that it burns more completely than lower grades. So.... if you plan on keeping your car for a decent length of time... it will prolong the life-span of the internals... especially the valves. you will see less build-up over time using a fuel that burns more completely...and therefore extends the life of the parts in your engine...especially the top end.
Mouse is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:55 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ack154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

We already covered the Top Tier Gas ideas (shell and others). Those gases are better than your average Mobile station, ya. But you still don't need a higher grade. You would just be using the better quality gas.
ack154 is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 03:00 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Scinergy
Team ScioNRG
 
Mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 5280
Posts: 2,569
Default

ok...well my bad for not seeing that in the other pages of this thread.... so I'll give ya that...lol
but you said it... using a better quality fuel does make a difference...short term and long term. And I was also just making the point that Shell is one that I know doesn't add any ethanol to their premium grade....therefore giving you better gas mileage.
Mouse is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 01:53 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ack154's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Actually I think that Shell uses less Ethanol period... not necessarily just Premium. But ya, using Shell at all is better than most others, so the rest is really still up to you.
ack154 is offline  


Quick Reply: Regular Gas is Recommended. Use it!



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21 AM.