TRD Intake or Injen Intake?
how do u prevent your car from hydrolocking if u have CAI? someone said something about a bypass valve? how much does that cost? and where wud u get it? will my car hydrolock if i drive in the rain?
Originally Posted by AtC2nv
If what the mag says is true, then whats the point of having a CAI or SRI espically if there is not alot of HP going to the wheels. Basically if your engin has more HP and the power doesnt get transferred to the wheels then your engine is creating more heat (from increase in HP) and more fuel will be getting burned. If what is saying is wrong, please enlighten me.
Regarding what's the point, if you are racing (on the track, I do not in any way condone street racing), every little bit helps. An intake, in conjunction with a header/more free flowing head/exhaust setup, is better than just an intake alone, or the above mods alone. On the track, horsepower is gained over multiple mods, not just single bolt ons.
An intake, alone and by itself, will do the following:
make your car sound more agressive/louder.
have bling factor.
trick you into thinking it is faster than it is.
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by OliverThomas
NO INTAKE will add 12 HP, thats just stupid. And as a short ram, it will probably detract horsepower, the only thing that the intakes have going for them is that they are smoother and more of a direct route to the throttle body, and they have a bigger volume capacity, although that doesn't make a huge difference as we only have a 2.4L engine. The short ram will immediately lose whatever performance gains you get from a better design to the massive ammount of hot air your going to be sucking into the engine. The only way to gain any small ammount of power is to install it as the cold air intake, which gets the air from the fenderwell. That colder air, paired with a better intake path, is what is giving you MAYBE 6-7 HP. And thats a big Maybe.
The *only* time a CAI has (an insignificant) advantage over a SRI is at a dead stop. Once the car is moving , airflow dissipates hot air in the engine bay, and there's aboslutely no benefit from one to the oher. 0&postorder=asc&start=0
Your right about most aftermarket brands not differing much in gains, because they're all pretty much the same design in the tC.
Hydrolock is a non-issue with the injen CAI, 95% of any water even in a torrential downpour (of which ive driven through 4 now this summer on the highway with this injen intake), the 5% of slight spray that MIGHT get into the fender well compartment is not going to hydrolock your car. it would LITERALY take submerging the whole damn front of the car and intake filter and gunning the throttle. Water cant be compressed, so when enough of is gets into a cylinder it makes the pressure on the upstroke spike way too high, and you get a blown engine. If your still concerned about it, you can go buy a Bypass Valve, AEM has them i think, but even they demonstrate that it takes submerging the damn intake into a tank of water to make the engine start to suck in water.
oliver, you are friekin awesome. i'm now thinking of buying a CAI cuz of the information you put out. good info. and its good to hear directly from somebody that has driven in bad rain.
Originally Posted by OliverThomas
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by OliverThomas
NO INTAKE will add 12 HP, thats just stupid. And as a short ram, it will probably detract horsepower, the only thing that the intakes have going for them is that they are smoother and more of a direct route to the throttle body, and they have a bigger volume capacity, although that doesn't make a huge difference as we only have a 2.4L engine. The short ram will immediately lose whatever performance gains you get from a better design to the massive ammount of hot air your going to be sucking into the engine. The only way to gain any small ammount of power is to install it as the cold air intake, which gets the air from the fenderwell. That colder air, paired with a better intake path, is what is giving you MAYBE 6-7 HP. And thats a big Maybe.
The *only* time a CAI has (an insignificant) advantage over a SRI is at a dead stop. Once the car is moving , airflow dissipates hot air in the engine bay, and there's aboslutely no benefit from one to the oher. 0&postorder=asc&start=0
Your right about most aftermarket brands not differing much in gains, because they're all pretty much the same design in the tC.
Hydrolock is a non-issue with the injen CAI, 95% of any water even in a torrential downpour (of which ive driven through 4 now this summer on the highway with this injen intake), the 5% of slight spray that MIGHT get into the fender well compartment is not going to hydrolock your car. it would LITERALY take submerging the whole damn front of the car and intake filter and gunning the throttle. Water cant be compressed, so when enough of is gets into a cylinder it makes the pressure on the upstroke spike way too high, and you get a blown engine. If your still concerned about it, you can go buy a Bypass Valve, AEM has them i think, but even they demonstrate that it takes submerging the damn intake into a tank of water to make the engine start to suck in water.
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...perature+tests
The probe was later placed in the opposite side of the engine bay to eliminate the possibility of temperature differences or pockets of thermal isolation. The results on underhood temperature was the same. At 45 mph underhood temps were the same as the outside air temps. So in reality a CAIs only real advantage is at lower speeds or at aiding launches.
Originally Posted by OliverThomas
Once the car is moving you have air entering the front of the engine bay through what??? Oh yeah, a radiator, which is essentially a huge heater for the engine bay. All the air coming in is sucked throught it, someone over on yoursciontc.com ran a tempature sensor under the hood for a week or so, reported 1-yes, a huge heat spike when sitting at idle under the hood, and 2- yes, a small dip in temp under the hood when the car was moving, but the air was still 10x hotter than fresh air taken from outside the engine bay.
Yuo guys can beleive what you want, but there has *yet* to be any scientific proof that showed a SRI makes significantly less hp than a CAI. Don't beleive me?
Links:
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4168
http://www.tprmag.com/issue/1/ca-injen2.shtml ( I posted this earlier)
Those links show you that on two seperate cars (first link is an xB, second I think a civic), two entirely different people, completely objective testers, no intake produced
significantly more WHP than the other, regardless of manufacturer or design.
You can keep drinking the CAI Koolaid if you want, but the fact of the matter is, an aftermarket intake's advantages over the stock result from:
removal of restrictive stock airbox
polished pipe (stock pipe is baffled, resulting in poor airflow)
more free flowing airfilter.
And I would like to know how people know that the TRD intake is a rebadged AEM. I think it is but there's no proof is there?
If there is it'd be nice to share.
And reasoning and deduction does not count as proof.
If there is it'd be nice to share.
And reasoning and deduction does not count as proof.
Those links show you that on two seperate cars (first link is an xB, second I think a civic), two entirely different people, completely objective testers, no intake produced
significantly more WHP than the other, regardless of manufacturer or design.
You can keep drinking the CAI Koolaid if you want, but the fact of the matter is, an aftermarket intake's advantages over the stock result from:
removal of restrictive stock airbox
polished pipe (stock pipe is baffled, resulting in poor airflow)
more free flowing airfilter.
significantly more WHP than the other, regardless of manufacturer or design.
You can keep drinking the CAI Koolaid if you want, but the fact of the matter is, an aftermarket intake's advantages over the stock result from:
removal of restrictive stock airbox
polished pipe (stock pipe is baffled, resulting in poor airflow)
more free flowing airfilter.
I still maintain that the temperture under the hood is never going to be the same as outside, you have a radiator heating the air coming in the front, granted, you have an open bottom, but this isnt' a reverse induction system here or something. There's an engine underneath producing a ton of heat, more under load than at idle. The guy who mesured the temps underneath the hood placed the probe right around the throttle body, behind the engine, and reported the temps there never got within 20 degree's of the outside tempature. You can't honesly say that the CAI doesnt' have a SLIGHT advantage over the SRI, they are equal in all respects EXCEPT for the fact that the CAI gets cooler air while the car is going slow, at idle, or under full load for that matter.[/quote]
^^ fair enough
For me, I only see the CAI being of benefit if you are runnign the 1/4 mile. the reason being that with all the idling while waitiing, and staging, ambient temperatures are really high, and heat soak becomes a tremendous issue.
For me, I only see the CAI being of benefit if you are runnign the 1/4 mile. the reason being that with all the idling while waitiing, and staging, ambient temperatures are really high, and heat soak becomes a tremendous issue.
placed the probe right around the throttle body, behind the engine, and reported the temps there never got within 20 degree's of the outside tempature
Originally Posted by jmiller20874
placed the probe right around the throttle body, behind the engine, and reported the temps there never got within 20 degree's of the outside tempature
Originally Posted by toastbox
Originally Posted by AtC2nv
If what the mag says is true, then whats the point of having a CAI or SRI espically if there is not alot of HP going to the wheels. Basically if your engin has more HP and the power doesnt get transferred to the wheels then your engine is creating more heat (from increase in HP) and more fuel will be getting burned. If what is saying is wrong, please enlighten me.
Regarding what's the point, if you are racing (on the track, I do not in any way condone street racing), every little bit helps. An intake, in conjunction with a header/more free flowing head/exhaust setup, is better than just an intake alone, or the above mods alone. On the track, horsepower is gained over multiple mods, not just single bolt ons.
An intake, alone and by itself, will do the following:
make your car sound more agressive/louder.
have bling factor.
trick you into thinking it is faster than it is.
Originally Posted by AtC2nv
ahh i get ya...thanks for the info...umm i also had another question...its about that TRD filter that replaces the cotton one thats stock...i think the TRD one costs about $60. I kno that FRAM and other companies use them too...do thay actually do aything? do they make the intake less restrictive by replacing the cotton filter???...thanks for all the info

regarding the TRD filter...I haven't seen them, nor read anything about them, so I don't have any first hand info on them, but I'm speculating that they wouldn't help that much. The reason is that the stock intake is restrictive at the inbox itself (an enclosed filter will *always* be more restrictive than an open one...try breathing through a straw, and see if it's more difficult than normal breathing. But lets say for a minute that it's not. The stock intake still has that baffled inlet pipe, and that too hinders airflow into the combustion chamber.
Maybe someone else can comment on it, but again, given the above restrictions, I see that TRD filter more as a marketing gimmick than an actual performance mod.






