ZPI v2 Crank Pulley Question
Originally Posted by hiram
i ordered mine w/o being anodized... oops will it make THAT much of a diffrence? or can i expect some problems later? they still havent shipped out darn it..=/
Originally Posted by hiram
i spoke to them earlier today, got my order changed to anodized =) i think i may be getting the ZPI exhaust as well
Good score on the exhaust. The mid-range is the sweet spot.
I ordered mine on 4/08/06 and it still hasnt been shipped. Got it without the anodized coating because they didnt have it when i ordered...not that they have either now. Im going to try and email them about getting it changed like DouBLeJ16
Personally, I think it's one person who hates the pulley, somebody named "lo_bux_racer"..
Anything he says gets backed up by a bunch of people who will believe anything he types.
Anything he says gets backed up by a bunch of people who will believe anything he types.
Yah I agree with you. He has a crazy amount of posts. Although he does seem pretty knowledgeable. I wish someone who was as knowledgeable or could provide some good points in how it wouldnt hurt the car would post something.
People who know something about the other side of the coin do post as well from time to time. Unfortunately they are often met by violent opposition to the point where they feel like the cause is no longer worth fighting. I have posted on many pulley threads myself. I could go on.... but sadly I'm tired of it all.
70,000+ miles with NST pulleys over the past few years and counting
70,000+ miles with NST pulleys over the past few years and counting
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
Personally, I think it's one person who hates the pulley, somebody named "lo_bux_racer"..
Anything he says gets backed up by a bunch of people who will believe anything he types.
Anything he says gets backed up by a bunch of people who will believe anything he types.
Sorry to everyone else, I have no problems with you, zpi or anyone for that matter. But this guy runs around starting arguments with absolutely nothing intelligent to add. I can promise I wont go into any of the effects on here. The discussion, as well as the links to supporting info can remain there.
^^ Agreed, 100%.
But as hpower said, our "camp" repeatedly meets with fierce and hostile and many times ignorant opposition.
ANYWAYS, I'm curious if anyone has average time improvements after installing a pulley. Theoretically speaking, shaving off about a pound or two should result in a reduction of about 0.02 in the 1/4 mile time. How's it show in real life?
But as hpower said, our "camp" repeatedly meets with fierce and hostile and many times ignorant opposition.
ANYWAYS, I'm curious if anyone has average time improvements after installing a pulley. Theoretically speaking, shaving off about a pound or two should result in a reduction of about 0.02 in the 1/4 mile time. How's it show in real life?
Originally Posted by hPower
People who know something about the other side of the coin do post as well from time to time. Unfortunately they are often met by violent opposition to the point where they feel like the cause is no longer worth fighting. I have posted on many pulley threads myself.
If you have an account over there, post something about your experiences and all the miles you've gone with no issues.
Originally Posted by kungpaosamuraiii
Theoretically speaking, shaving off about a pound or two should result in a reduction of about 0.02 in the 1/4 mile time. How's it show in real life?
I'm pretty sure it'll take more then .02 seconds off my time.. More like .1, but we'll see.
From what i've noticed double usually has very valid posts. Although a lot of times the way people might percieve him might be in a bad way, he is not a troll or just trying to stir crap up.
But to bring it back to topic, has anyone with this currently installed noticed any new vibrations?
But to bring it back to topic, has anyone with this currently installed noticed any new vibrations?
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
Keep it in the other forum engifineer.
I'm not "starting arguments" as you mentioned I just don't agree with what you (or should I just say lo_bux) has to say.
I'm not "starting arguments" as you mentioned I just don't agree with what you (or should I just say lo_bux) has to say.





