I'm off to get tuned...
#24
soo the difference with the mustang dyno vs dyno jet or w.e is like 40hp? and gl with the tune bro im going there to get tuned what fuel management do u have? also how is the tune drive home? its about what 45min to an hour to orlando from melbourne?
#30
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 2,251
Ooookaaay people. The highest numbers posted were the best. Not sure exactly what boost it hit but he said it hovered just shy of 10. DONT TAKE MY NEXT WORDS OUT OF CONTEXT PLEASE! The car ride home was absolutely terrible. This is NOT Omar's fault or CFT for that matter. It is simply due to our ECU being so damn smart! The car made respectable numbers on the dyno during his tuning pulls. After leaving the dyno, the car drove like poop. It stuttered and went insanely rich at anything more than 20% throttle. When I say insanely rich, I mean <9 AFR. I have since done a few street pulls with my laptop on my old tune with zero'd out Fuel and Ignition maps result in 10.5-11.5 @ WOT and same psi as earlier on the dyno. The idle AFR is now 13-14 which is better than the 12.5 I was getting before and cruising sits near 13. It would seem to me that the ECU is doing all the work here. I've got the UEGO streaming to the laptop and was watching the cells, everything ran perfect. I bought a vacuum block while I was there. Will be putting that in tomorrow so I will be able to use my boost gauge again (don't ask). To answer the other questions, yes they are those tail-lights but I have special plans for them. The RS3 tails are for sale in classifieds. The drive back to Melbourne is an hour with NO traffic. Any moderate traffic adds another half an hour. I know that these guys know their stuff but I don't think the F/IC is the right tuning tool for this car at all. Just as Omar said, the AEM EMS is the best way to go if you want solid reliable numbers. If the ECU is still in the mix, it is the boss. If you try to tell it what to do, it smacks you silly and calls you Sally.
#31
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 2,251
Originally Posted by curtislo9
I see 266 HP on the screen, with 244.4 TQ
#32
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 2,251
Originally Posted by paul_dezod
274 and 252 is what I see
#34
Im running the FIC with the ptuning kit and it run pretty damn smoothly on my car all my afrs seem right on track . IMO sounds like your tuner just cant work with the FIC very well. Oh well nice numbers regardless and good luck getting to 300 :D
#35
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 2,251
Originally Posted by mospeedtc
Im running the FIC with the ptuning kit and it run pretty damn smoothly on my car all my afrs seem right on track . IMO sounds like your tuner just cant work with the FIC very well. Oh well nice numbers regardless and good luck getting to 300 :D
#38
Senior Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 2,251
Originally Posted by weezyfbayba
hmmm now got me wondering if i wanan go 2 cft......
#39
Originally Posted by rangerryda
Ooookaaay people. The highest numbers posted were the best. Not sure exactly what boost it hit but he said it hovered just shy of 10. DONT TAKE MY NEXT WORDS OUT OF CONTEXT PLEASE! The car ride home was absolutely terrible. This is NOT Omar's fault or CFT for that matter. It is simply due to our ECU being so damn smart! The car made respectable numbers on the dyno during his tuning pulls. After leaving the dyno, the car drove like poop. It stuttered and went insanely rich at anything more than 20% throttle. When I say insanely rich, I mean <9 AFR. I have since done a few street pulls with my laptop on my old tune with zero'd out Fuel and Ignition maps result in 10.5-11.5 @ WOT and same psi as earlier on the dyno. The idle AFR is now 13-14 which is better than the 12.5 I was getting before and cruising sits near 13. It would seem to me that the ECU is doing all the work here. I've got the UEGO streaming to the laptop and was watching the cells, everything ran perfect. I bought a vacuum block while I was there. Will be putting that in tomorrow so I will be able to use my boost gauge again (don't ask). To answer the other questions, yes they are those tail-lights but I have special plans for them. The RS3 tails are for sale in classifieds. The drive back to Melbourne is an hour with NO traffic. Any moderate traffic adds another half an hour. I know that these guys know their stuff but I don't think the F/IC is the right tuning tool for this car at all. Just as Omar said, the AEM EMS is the best way to go if you want solid reliable numbers. If the ECU is still in the mix, it is the boss. If you try to tell it what to do, it smacks you silly and calls you Sally.
So does the Hydra. That's why they are called Standalones and set you back $2g's.
#40
Originally Posted by rangerryda
Originally Posted by paul_dezod
274 and 252 is what I see
Not true, just so you know. PTuning's tC makes 504whp on a Dyno Dynamics on an Emanage Ultimate.