Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

Monster Motorworks TC Supercharger Intake W/Dyno!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #41  
cee_dub2003's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
AlphaSquad
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 774
From: Daly City, CA
Default



The kit includes 2x Couplers. All the clamps needed. Secret Weapon filter. Adapter on the tube for your MAF.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #42  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

Can the 07 tC use it as well?
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #43  
cee_dub2003's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
AlphaSquad
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 774
From: Daly City, CA
Default

Originally Posted by soros151
Can the 07 tC use it as well?
At this time no it cannot. Due to the different MAF that is on the 07 TC. We do have the 2007 Secret weapon intake for the non-supercharged available.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:10 PM
  #44  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

I knew, it I was asking before a huge amount of people with 07 get to ask it. I have an 06 by the way.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #45  
Stone128's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 119
Default

From what i've been reading a safe afr is between 11-12.5. So it seems that adding this intake to your supercharger makes it very lean and unsafe to use.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #46  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

Actually the stock AFR is almost the same with the flash for the S/C exept the stock only adjusts a little up top. Both remain at 14.7, except the S/C lowers the AFRs at 4000+RPM. Still the way that map is already lean, this intake doesn't change too much, but adds to the paranoia.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #47  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

Seems interesting, but I think ill be the guy that waits and see's how others that buy this turn out.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #48  
Stone128's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 119
Default

I thought I heard somewhere that the trd s/c runs rich stock to avoid any chances of detonation.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #49  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

Also, how is this going to re-act when combined with a Pulley upgrade?
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #50  
1tc4u2nv's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 464
From: Hialeah, FL
Default

i think is better to run the stock air box with a k&n filter because that filter exposed like that will get some major heatsoak when the engine gets warmed up after some driving at that point you will loose some ponies
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 09:54 PM
  #51  
06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,761
Default

True ^ Could be.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #52  
redwar1441's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 569
Default

soros what do you know about the trd map i posted a topic up a day or two ago about it but no replies
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 10:05 PM
  #53  
redwar1441's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 569
Default

for all you supercharger guys i would just run the stock airbox with the bottom removed. Cut the lip off the box tho so you have something to hold your stock filters in with. Im willing to bet it will be the highest hp available for the s/c. The power comes from the air flowing through the maf sensor mount and its ability to read it correctly. Belive it or not toyota knows what they are doing.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #54  
soros151's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,777
From: Orlando, Fl//Scion FR-S
Default

Toyota didn't design the S/C, Vortech did. And what thread? :D So I can try to see it.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #55  
redwar1441's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 569
Default

i didnt mean the s/c design i ment the intake routing and maf design.


btw the thread i started just asked if anyone knows anything about the trd reflash. exactly what it changes specifically and hp number diffrances. richer, leaner, ignition changes etc.

https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...599&highlight=
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 02:09 AM
  #56  
jetlounge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,434
From: Westchester, NY
Default

is it me or do the welds look a little sloppy...like on the maf port and on all of the curvy parts of the pipe?

also for heatsoak...MM has an 'air box' for their other intakes. would that help?
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:11 AM
  #57  
yellot00tr's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 902
From: Long Island
Default

the air box should help some, but i there isn't one available yet for this intake. there's a pic i posted a long time ago that showed someone taking the temp under the hood and then also taking the temp inside of the air box. i can't remember what the diff in temp was-maybe like 10 degrees difference inside and outside of the box.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #58  
The_Sciontologist's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 146
Default

Ok, this is a question for MMW. The intake in the first picture looks NOTHING like the one posted on the top of this page. So my question is: If the intake on the first page made 9.5whp/8.5wtq, how much does the one you are selling make? They are clearly not the same intake, so results may vary. Thanks in advance
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #59  
jetlounge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,434
From: Westchester, NY
Default

look similar to me...same sloppy welds?
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 05:28 PM
  #60  
The_Sciontologist's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 146
Default

well if you look at the first pic, you can see that sharp bend and it doesn't curve back towards the front of the car, but rather it seems that they cut the stock silicone hose. The picture at the top of pg.3 , it has several small bends, as opposed to one sharp one. Also you can see it curves all the way towards the front eliminating the silicone hose altogether and only needs couplers. Maybe I'm just trippin' but they don't look the same to me. could be the angles



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 PM.