went to the track tonight
#21
That was the least intelligent bunch of horse $#1t I have heard in quite some time. YOU talked about beating an isf, so you were doing the comparison. I just stated the obvious (that the isf obviously puts down MUCH faster times than your car), so you didnt outrun one if he was seriously racing and actually knew how to drive. From a roll or a dig, wouldnt matter with a car with a nicer tq curve than yours. Common sense.
All you can come back with is some little kiddie comment like "your mad cause your slow", rather than a valid point? Nice
All you can come back with is some little kiddie comment like "your mad cause your slow", rather than a valid point? Nice
once again u fail at life, the isf has a 8spd aut transmission and awd thus allowing the 12.5 pass they make...
their tq curve means nothing to me when i brake boost i have instant tq, but u clearly know nothing of such matter
and back to the isf... 418 hp to the crank at 4000lbs vs my 300 to the WHEELS 2900 lb tc u do the math of power to weight oh and i make more tq than hp so add some digits there...
and if he was not racing he wouldnt have done the 3 honks....and moises wouldnt have been a witness...
u sir are a magnificant RETARD
all valid reasons for u to shut ur face cuz u just got pwned by factual truth, now go sit back and continue driving ur 15 second car
Last edited by cburglb34; 04-12-2010 at 04:51 AM.
#23
no high horse just tryna get it in that fools head that from a roll every aspect put my car above the is-f
and high 13s yes on street tires, general rule of thumb is for every .1 second of your 60' is .2 in et time...well my 13.718 was with a 2.3 60'
so add some slicks on cut the time down to a 1.9( im being moddest here cuz i could maybe get 1.8 ) that make a 12.9 pass with a 1.9 60' of course all conditions must be perfect
and high 13s yes on street tires, general rule of thumb is for every .1 second of your 60' is .2 in et time...well my 13.718 was with a 2.3 60'
so add some slicks on cut the time down to a 1.9( im being moddest here cuz i could maybe get 1.8 ) that make a 12.9 pass with a 1.9 60' of course all conditions must be perfect
#24
once again u fail at life, the isf has a 8spd aut transmission and awd thus allowing the 12.5 pass they make...
their tq curve means nothing to me when i brake boost i have instant tq, but u clearly know nothing of such matter
and back to the isf... 418 hp to the crank at 3780lbs vs my 272.9 to the WHEELS 2970 lb tc u do the math of power to weight oh and i make more tq than hp so add some digits there...
and if he was not racing he wouldnt have done the 3 honks....and moises wouldnt have been a witness...
u sir are a magnificant RETARD
all valid reasons for u to shut ur face cuz u just got pwned by factual truth, now go sit back and continue driving ur 15 second car
their tq curve means nothing to me when i brake boost i have instant tq, but u clearly know nothing of such matter
and back to the isf... 418 hp to the crank at 3780lbs vs my 272.9 to the WHEELS 2970 lb tc u do the math of power to weight oh and i make more tq than hp so add some digits there...
and if he was not racing he wouldnt have done the 3 honks....and moises wouldnt have been a witness...
u sir are a magnificant RETARD
all valid reasons for u to shut ur face cuz u just got pwned by factual truth, now go sit back and continue driving ur 15 second car
and if you you would like to crunch some more numbers heres a link you should take a look at.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Lexus--IS-F...l?resultpage=2
...the slowest isf still traps higher than you. give it up.
#25
fixed.
and if you you would like to crunch some more numbers heres a link you should take a look at.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Lexus--IS-F...l?resultpage=2
...the slowest isf still traps higher than you. give it up.
and if you you would like to crunch some more numbers heres a link you should take a look at.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Lexus--IS-F...l?resultpage=2
...the slowest isf still traps higher than you. give it up.
any who w.e this thread was about my track times not bout the isf that I DID BEAT
#30
#32
wait isf isnt awd? oh well, anyways....aND no dyno sheet for the more power cuz it was street tuned
believe what u want ... 108 isnt a 272hp trap
believe what u want ... 108 isnt a 272hp trap
#34
pretty soon im just gonna leave this forum all u guys do is bash on me even tho u have nothing to bash on besides me racing in the rain which is my decision not yours
#35
no high horse just tryna get it in that fools head that from a roll every aspect put my car above the is-f
and high 13s yes on street tires, general rule of thumb is for every .1 second of your 60' is .2 in et time...well my 13.718 was with a 2.3 60'
so add some slicks on cut the time down to a 1.9( im being moddest here cuz i could maybe get 1.8 ) that make a 12.9 pass with a 1.9 60' of course all conditions must be perfect
and high 13s yes on street tires, general rule of thumb is for every .1 second of your 60' is .2 in et time...well my 13.718 was with a 2.3 60'
so add some slicks on cut the time down to a 1.9( im being moddest here cuz i could maybe get 1.8 ) that make a 12.9 pass with a 1.9 60' of course all conditions must be perfect
#38
hmm that doesnt make sense. if you were "street tuned" how do you know you made more power AND i coulda sworn you said you went to ptuning again to get tuned making 272whp "so last month"
shady posts are shady
shady posts are shady
#39
because when i made 272.9 u had a broken wastegate diaphram causing a boos tleak when i fixed it my car started running lean around 12.5 at boost...
so i got it retuned
i did but it was just for wot settings so they street tuned it
so i got it retuned
i did but it was just for wot settings so they street tuned it