ClubRSX dissin TC's
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 109
Definitely sucks to be at the bottom of the foodchain.
Toyota needs to put the tC on a diet and put a 2ZZ-GE that's used in the Lotus Elise under the hood. I hope someone from Toyota reads this.
Toyota needs to put the tC on a diet and put a 2ZZ-GE that's used in the Lotus Elise under the hood. I hope someone from Toyota reads this.
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232
From: Philly
Originally Posted by onefiend
Definitely sucks to be at the bottom of the foodchain.
Toyota needs to put the tC on a diet and put a 2ZZ-GE that's used in the Lotus Elise under the hood. I hope someone from Toyota reads this.
Toyota needs to put the tC on a diet and put a 2ZZ-GE that's used in the Lotus Elise under the hood. I hope someone from Toyota reads this.
Senior Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 293
From: 2o1, NJ
Originally Posted by onefiend
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
1984 lbs Elise vs 2900 lbs tC 
lol i say just take it all out and replace it with plexiglass lol
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 109
Originally Posted by phoenix_2o1_rising
Originally Posted by onefiend
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
1984 lbs Elise vs 2900 lbs tC
lol i say just take it all out and replace it with plexiglass lol
Senior Member
SL Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 452
From: Texas
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
Originally Posted by Butane
LOL. Pretty much 98% of clubrsx are tools. Having a SRT I know of all the excuses they give "we have better interiors, our resale is higher, whine , whine excuse, excuse. They have been racing interiors since 03. But i would be ____ed too if I paid $23K+ on a car that dynos like 170wheel. dahahahaha
If I wanted to spend $23k on a brand new car I would get the mazdaspeed 3 and run circles around the overpriced RSX. The car is better all around, handling, acceleration, top speed and braking.
if that was the case, i would be in a srt-4 or a bike instead
Senior Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 293
From: 2o1, NJ
i like how this thread went from rsx haters to talking about our glass lol, but imo from what ive been told, alot of our excess weight is in our roof because of the "roll cages" or better yet, extra metal support beams needed cause our roof panels are glass, so we dont get crushed in a roll over... so yea removing glasds would be a nice thing to do but i doubt it would really alleviate alot of the weight issues with our fat cars
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Originally Posted by phoenix_2o1_rising
i like how this thread went from rsx haters to talking about our glass lol, but imo from what ive been told, alot of our excess weight is in our roof because of the "roll cages" or better yet, extra metal support beams needed cause our roof panels are glass, so we dont get crushed in a roll over... so yea removing glasds would be a nice thing to do but i doubt it would really alleviate alot of the weight issues with our fat cars
Originally Posted by DOHCtor
Originally Posted by phoenix_2o1_rising
i like how this thread went from rsx haters to talking about our glass lol, but imo from what ive been told, alot of our excess weight is in our roof because of the "roll cages" or better yet, extra metal support beams needed cause our roof panels are glass, so we dont get crushed in a roll over... so yea removing glasds would be a nice thing to do but i doubt it would really alleviate alot of the weight issues with our fat cars