Preliminary clues: 2009 tC/Second generation
#21
Originally Posted by Chrisb319
Watch them come out with a nicer looking car than ours that has RWD, 6speed, 6cyl sport coupe that everyone always wanted. I'll be ____ed.
I just got my car, and if they come out with a better version next year, Id be ____ed too.
unless they make it weaker
#25
Re: Preliminary clues: 2009 tC/Second generation
Originally Posted by jschneideriii
...with a strong c-pillar, deep tumblehome and strong rear fenders spicing up the car....
#28
Originally Posted by cwayne
I think Christ will come again before we get another RWD Corolla.
And like the other guy said, I choose not to believe anyone who claims to have worked for Scion. some people are such attention ******...
#29
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Re: Preliminary clues: 2009 tC/Second generation
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
Originally Posted by jschneideriii
...with a strong c-pillar, deep tumblehome and strong rear fenders spicing up the car....
A small amount of tumblehome is normal in many designs in order to allow any small projections at deck level to clear wharves (Pursey p. 21. One of the reasons it was originally used was to make boarding more difficult. It also reduces the beam of the main deck, so reducing its weight and increasing stability. It was abandoned for nearly a century in large warships, as the angle of the hull increased the likelihood of penetration by shells, compared with vertical sides. It has recently been reintroduced for the United States' DDG-1000 class destroyer.
A degree of tumblehome also facilitates paddling in a canoe or kayak (Mather, 1885), while a greater degree of flare (its opposite) accommodates more cargo (Vaillancourt).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumblehome
#30
Originally Posted by cwayne
Originally Posted by sddykstr
That's what you call aiming too high. Bah, 3.5L. Set your goals low and your bound to succeed. :p
#31
Originally Posted by bBlover
Originally Posted by cwayne
Originally Posted by sddykstr
That's what you call aiming too high. Bah, 3.5L. Set your goals low and your bound to succeed. :p
#32
Re: Preliminary clues: 2009 tC/Second generation
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
Originally Posted by jschneideriii
...with a strong c-pillar, deep tumblehome and strong rear fenders spicing up the car....
A small amount of tumblehome is normal in many designs in order to allow any small projections at deck level to clear wharves (Pursey p. 21. One of the reasons it was originally used was to make boarding more difficult. It also reduces the beam of the main deck, so reducing its weight and increasing stability. It was abandoned for nearly a century in large warships, as the angle of the hull increased the likelihood of penetration by shells, compared with vertical sides. It has recently been reintroduced for the United States' DDG-1000 class destroyer.
A degree of tumblehome also facilitates paddling in a canoe or kayak (Mather, 1885), while a greater degree of flare (its opposite) accommodates more cargo (Vaillancourt).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumblehome
I'm way more confused than before...so, the Fuse is a boat?
#33
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Re: Preliminary clues: 2009 tC/Second generation
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Originally Posted by captainlaziness
Originally Posted by jschneideriii
...with a strong c-pillar, deep tumblehome and strong rear fenders spicing up the car....
A small amount of tumblehome is normal in many designs in order to allow any small projections at deck level to clear wharves (Pursey p. 21. One of the reasons it was originally used was to make boarding more difficult. It also reduces the beam of the main deck, so reducing its weight and increasing stability. It was abandoned for nearly a century in large warships, as the angle of the hull increased the likelihood of penetration by shells, compared with vertical sides. It has recently been reintroduced for the United States' DDG-1000 class destroyer.
A degree of tumblehome also facilitates paddling in a canoe or kayak (Mather, 1885), while a greater degree of flare (its opposite) accommodates more cargo (Vaillancourt).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumblehome
I'm way more confused than before...so, the Fuse is a boat?
#36
Originally Posted by monkeysauce
Come on guys, it's Toyota. The next tC will be bigger and heavier, with a bigger engine. Have they ever made a new revision of a car smaller and lighter?
If they keep the name "tC" expect it to get bigger and heavier.
I'd prefer a next gen AE86 with the 1.8 and RWD. Drop the tC and just call it a tE
-THE DON
#37
Senior Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 16,646
Originally Posted by THE_DON
Originally Posted by monkeysauce
Come on guys, it's Toyota. The next tC will be bigger and heavier, with a bigger engine. Have they ever made a new revision of a car smaller and lighter?
If they keep the name "tC" expect it to get bigger and heavier.
I'd prefer a next gen AE86 with the 1.8 and RWD. Drop the tC and just call it a tE
-THE DON
#38
Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Originally Posted by THE_DON
Originally Posted by monkeysauce
Come on guys, it's Toyota. The next tC will be bigger and heavier, with a bigger engine. Have they ever made a new revision of a car smaller and lighter?
If they keep the name "tC" expect it to get bigger and heavier.
I'd prefer a next gen AE86 with the 1.8 and RWD. Drop the tC and just call it a tE
-THE DON
-THE DON
#39
i may just be the only one who doesn't really like the new fuse concept... its just not my taste.
so if scion goes that direction styling wise for the next gen. tC ill be fine with it.
that'll mean only one year of the 08' in production. therefore less of em on the road.
so if scion goes that direction styling wise for the next gen. tC ill be fine with it.
that'll mean only one year of the 08' in production. therefore less of em on the road.
#40
I'm thinking 2010 remodel, sold in 2009. As far as specs, I have no guess or much perfernece at that, but lets just keep the pricing in mind as well. Cant have everything if the price is to be under..say...20k-ish?