Sf Turbo
I saw a pic on another thread and was a little worried about the setup. If you look here it looks like they cut the cross member support that runs in front bumper. This doesn't like a smart thing to do. I could be wrong and that is what it is normally like since i haven't taken off the front bumper. here is a link to the pic
they didn't cut the support beam for viewing purposes did they? b/c they could have been doing that to show ya how big the i.c. was. other than the cut support it looks like a decent setup.
Here is what sf had to say about their intercooler setup on another Scion Life forum:
Here is a link to that discussion
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11380
the intercooler is larger than nessesary it's for the bling aflect at shows the kit will come with an intercooler that dosn't require cutting the bumper support
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11380
Originally Posted by bBted
is that the OBX R air filter on the SFR turbo?
Untill you post dyno #'s or timeslips i wouldnt even be talking crap about other company's.
All your doing is making yourself and Stafford Fabrications look immature, your giving everyone a really bad impression.
Great Customer Relations there buddy.
All your doing is making yourself and Stafford Fabrications look immature, your giving everyone a really bad impression.
Great Customer Relations there buddy.
cant talk too much ____ against revhard...they are a proven company. i can care less if you have a phat-___ ride either....who cares. anybody can talk as much crap as they want....its called criticism.....that happens when you fix up a car, if you cant deal with that then dont bother showing pictures of your car...there will always be some positive/negative comments....so deal with it
having a equal length tubular manifold versus a log manifold wont make too much of a difference unless you are making high horsepower numbers. log style turbo manifolds are mostly for street turbo setups. i could go into the differences and stuff but i dont wanna do that now.
i still wanna know what the fuel setup consists of with the SF kit...?
having a equal length tubular manifold versus a log manifold wont make too much of a difference unless you are making high horsepower numbers. log style turbo manifolds are mostly for street turbo setups. i could go into the differences and stuff but i dont wanna do that now.
i still wanna know what the fuel setup consists of with the SF kit...?
unless something was said outside of this thread, i dont see where he said anything bad about you or you car, read it again.
maybe he was interested in the kit and the cut cross member made him worried. if its not something that is required for the kit, thats all that needed to be said. from the sounds of it, you have a very rare turbo set up, A SUCCESSFULL ONE! congratulations on that, but the comments you made blow.
Originally Posted by ikonXone
I saw a pic on another thread and was a little worried about the setup. If you look here it looks like they cut the cross member support that runs in front bumper. This doesn't like a smart thing to do. I could be wrong and that is what it is normally like since i haven't taken off the front bumper. here is a link to the pic
#1 Aggin has a ____load into his turbo setup, more than anyone can imagine. His setup can handle LOADS because of the precision products he put into it (what you don't see). I have to agree, when I saw the filter, I thought OBX...ehhh, but the color does rock and that's all he wanted.
#2 Stafford said they aren't doing the kit like Aggin has...YOU WOULDN"T BE ABLE TO AFFORD IT. It looks more like the revhard kit with the smaller intercooler. Aggin is right, revhard has yet to start up their turbo xB where as his is fully functioning and running strong.
damn people, just stick with nitrous. It's easy, it's affordable, and people can ask "how much you juicin"
"squeeze the juice"
-Encino Man
#2 Stafford said they aren't doing the kit like Aggin has...YOU WOULDN"T BE ABLE TO AFFORD IT. It looks more like the revhard kit with the smaller intercooler. Aggin is right, revhard has yet to start up their turbo xB where as his is fully functioning and running strong.
damn people, just stick with nitrous. It's easy, it's affordable, and people can ask "how much you juicin"
"squeeze the juice"
-Encino Man
http://vvti.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1829
FYI..
5months is a fukin long wait when you've dropped 3500 dollars..
FYI..
5months is a fukin long wait when you've dropped 3500 dollars..
Senior Member



Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
believe me I don't take either side. . . because I could really care less, but it sure sounds like flames when you down play somebody's stock ride. But anyway, I like your setup. . . for show it's great. You can argue functionality all you want, but like others have stated and you yourself, it's for show. Looks mean as hell. But those who are going for the far ends of performance may not want to cut their cross-members.
I don't plan on doing many mods, because I've gone that route with my Lexus, and I've learned that no matter what, someone will be faster. . . hahaha but I'm gonna keep it mostly stock and maybe some subtle mods for looks. . . but that's my path.
I don't plan on doing many mods, because I've gone that route with my Lexus, and I've learned that no matter what, someone will be faster. . . hahaha but I'm gonna keep it mostly stock and maybe some subtle mods for looks. . . but that's my path.
Ya, the problems with stafford and with those guys is that their kits were supposedly already produced were as ours aren't so you can't use their problems on us. So far the 2 guys who went to stafford got turbo kits...doesn't get much better than that for scions.



