Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]

tC Engine (2AZ-FE) vs 06 RAV4 (2AZ-FE) Engine oil..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2006, 08:08 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
sciontc_mich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,900
Default tC Engine (2AZ-FE) vs 06 RAV4 (2AZ-FE) Engine oil..

Okay, friend got a 2006 RAV4 with the 4cyl engine. Since they're both 2AZ-FE,
why is it that the 06 RAV4 requires 5w-20 oil and 4.5 quarts? When the tC requires 5w-30 and 4 quarts?

Did the 06 tC change in its specs for oil and quantity?? Let me know.. Thanks.

___

Last edited by MR_LUV; 05-21-2021 at 06:51 AM. Reason: Awarded 15 Yr Badge
sciontc_mich is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 02:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DouBLeJ16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 2,114
Default

That's a damn good question..
DouBLeJ16 is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 02:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Strictly Scionized
SL Member
 
trialsindude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: White Marsh, Balti Co., MD
Posts: 1,284
Default

Possibly because the RAV4 has a bigger oil pan.....
trialsindude is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 03:25 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Batjew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Duluth, GA
Posts: 595
Default

no. same engine in the 06 as 05, im sure there's a bigger filter in teh rav4, and considering it's an SUV, it'll work harder to pull more. again it's a manufacturer RECOMMENDATION, not set in the stone. and who's to say the engines are the same, the Carmy and tC engine aren't the same internally anyway.
Batjew is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 04:02 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
SquallLHeart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,699
Default

hmm... though.. i have to add that many of the tC parts have seemed to work on the RAV4, which i did not know about.. met a guy that had one that said so. (can't remember what things though... i'm sure the CF engine cover was one of them.. haha.. duh..)
SquallLHeart is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 04:37 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
sciontc_mich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,900
Default

well the oil filter is the same exact filter for both engines, checked the part numbers.. the 90915-10004 fits both and is the same filter..

so my big question is.. why more quantity of oil? and why the change from 5w-30 to 5w-20 oil??

thanks for all the replies so far..
sciontc_mich is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 04:56 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
TheQuietThings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 5,920
Default

the only differences in the 2 engines i can find, is the compression, and the fuel delivery system.

The Rav4 has a 9.8:1 compression
tC has a 9.6:1 compression

RAV4 fuel delivery system is SEFI
tC fuel delivery system is MPFI

I'm really not sure if that has anything to do with why the oil weight is different, but its a possibility.
TheQuietThings is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 06:34 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
engifineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 9,731
Default

check the oil pan.. same engine in no way means the same oil pan. It could be a different size due to clearance or other issues.

I dont know why the viscosity is different.. but I do know that they changed the internals on the 2az a bit.

And I dont know if you check your oil again after starting and idling the vehicle after an oil change (you should), but mine takes almost another 1/2 qt afterwards, as most do. That makes almost 4.5 qts
engifineer is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:09 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
nodsetse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego (Mira Mesa), CA
Posts: 2,338
Default

Originally Posted by TheQuietThings
The Rav4 has a 9.8:1 compression
tC has a 9.6:1 compression
New Camry engine is 9.8:1 too, yet again has the same designation. Appears tCs have a unique engine, not likely to be used elsewhere.
nodsetse is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 04:50 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Whocares05050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,689
Default

Intresting...
Whocares05050 is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 06:01 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
iowagary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,323
Default

What difference would the slightly lower compression make? Can anyone make a generalization there?
iowagary is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 06:23 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
unsungfate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paramount, CA
Posts: 675
Default

i thought that a higher compression ratio was better than a lower one?
unsungfate is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 12:54 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DouBLeJ16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 2,114
Default

Originally Posted by unsungfate
i thought that a higher compression ratio was better than a lower one?
Higher compression is good for NA engines.. Lower compression is good for FI.
DouBLeJ16 is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 12:55 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
DouBLeJ16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 2,114
Default

I saw on tv yesterday that they're putting a 269hp V6 into the RAV4 now.. I don't suppose there is any hope for a swap into the tC?
DouBLeJ16 is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 12:55 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
engifineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 9,731
Default

Originally Posted by unsungfate
i thought that a higher compression ratio was better than a lower one?
You can generate more power on the same platform with higher compression typically. Too high and you run a higher chance of pre-ignition, especially if you go FI, which is why you see people dropping the compression on an engine sometimes before adding FI. It depends on the starting ratio and how much boost you wish to run.

One drawback of running higher compression ratios like 11:1 is the need to run premium fuel to help prevent pre-ignition. Not really a huge price difference if you add it up over a year, but still something to consider. Some think it is costing them a fortune to run 91 instead of 89... which is not true if you actually do the math

If you want to run NA and produce more power, one option is to bump the compression up as long as you are within the limits of the system .
engifineer is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 12:56 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
TheQuietThings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 5,920
Default

Originally Posted by unsungfate
i thought that a higher compression ratio was better than a lower one?
Higher compression means more air is being crammed into the engine, which normally results is more power, and worse fuel economy.
TheQuietThings is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 01:46 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
engifineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 9,731
Default

^^ no, higher compression means just that.. .more compression. The higher you compress the gas the more power you can produce per ignition up to a limit. A higher compression piston on a stock bore and stroke has a domed top on it.

You can actually create power more efficiently with higher cr than with lower cr.
engifineer is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 07:55 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
unsungfate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paramount, CA
Posts: 675
Default

^^^^sweet, i want those 11.1:1 cams zpi has now...
unsungfate is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:01 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
sciontc_mich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,900
Default

interesting info from everyone.. glad i asked about the engine differences.. i was also curious.. does a higher CR mean better fuel economy? or just more power?
sciontc_mich is offline  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:58 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
GT4Dreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SuperDuperModfromMichigan
Posts: 595
Default

The 269 hp engine in the rav is a v6, not a 4 cylinder.

Higher Compressions = (in blunt explanation) more air and fuel in the same amount of space = more power.

Higher compression will require higher octane gas. Celica GTS compression is 11:8:1 I beleive, and it uses premium gas.

Higher compression cars don't equate to better fuel economy, but it does equate to more power (even if it's just a little bit more)

Turbo cars have lower compression because they have a turbo.
GT4Dreams is offline  


Quick Reply: tC Engine (2AZ-FE) vs 06 RAV4 (2AZ-FE) Engine oil..



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:40 AM.