Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]

tC listed 19th in Forbes Most Dangerous List

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #1  
ack154's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default tC listed 19th in Forbes Most Dangerous List

I think this is probably a useless list at this point, since the 08 tC comes with side and curtain airbags standard... no?

But here you go anyways...
19. Toyota Scion tC

Two-Door

SCORE: 113

Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Better than average

Like most small, sporty coupes, the tC boasts good handling--as evidenced by CR's "better than average" rating for accident avoidance and a relatively low risk of rollover. But side-impact airbags aren't standard and if not equipped with the optional side airbags and curtain bags, the tC can be a little risky. It received a just-acceptable, four-star side-impact rating
Here's the full link:
http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/veh..._0726cars.html

Kind of a dumb list. Since even their #1 they're saying is discontinued. And a bunch of the ones on the list are only there b/c the side/curtain airbags are optional and not standard. And the S2000 is on there b/c it doesn't even have them as an option. Well no ____... look at the car, where would you put them?!
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #2  
abuzzl23pTC's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 57
Default

well unfortunately theres another reason to get rid of the tc
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #3  
ack154's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,701
Default

Well I think they're playing it up a little more than necessary. It's not like it's a death trap - though they really make it sound like that.

Ya... a barely acceptable 4 star side impact rating (out of 5). Ya, we're all going to die now.

Take it with a few grains of salt, really. Just more random media paranoia.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
SquallLHeart's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member

5 Year Member

SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scinergy
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,699
Default

ehh.. i've seen the impact that these cars can stand and still protect the occupants inside....

i think i'll trust my own experiences and other friends before a magazine.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #5  
tC4italy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,092
From: Royal Post Palace
Default

I have the side airbags.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #6  
sciontC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
DeepSouth Scions
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,512
Default

I think its jsut fine, especially if you got the side airbags.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 08:15 PM
  #7  
HR_Guy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 918
From: Portland, OR
Default

I have inflated balloons lining my door panels. I think I'm good.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #8  
Deathwish238's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 882
From: Austin, TX
Default

Plus...side airbags are standard on all 08 tCs
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #9  
flipguy206's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,053
From: Seattle, WA
Default

for side airbags I like having a huge set of double d's sitting in the passenger seat.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #10  
DuMa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,616
From: Orange County, CA
Default

its dangerous because its primary age group is the 18-24 male crowd
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #11  
shadow12one's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,285
From: Palatine, Illinois
Default

Quite a few members of these boards were involved in accidents. Some of them bad accidents. The cars were mangled but the driver made it out ok. I think that tells you something about the car. Doesnt matter how the car looks in the end, if it protected the driver it did its job.

...They listed it as a Toyota Scion tC
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #12  
Chrisb319's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,736
From: Live Free Or Die, NH
Default

Apparently none of those jerk offs haver ever driven in a Ford Festiva, google it if you've never seen it. It doesn't matter how safe a car is, there are just some wrecks you can't walk away from.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #13  
engifineer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,731
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

The car holds up amazingly well in wrecks. And there is a lot to be said against airbags and how much safer they make you as well. If thier only beef is that it doesnt come standard with SAB then they are complete jerk offs. The structural build is amazing considering the type and size of the car, as witnessed by the many who have walked away after rolling the car multiple times, getting hit, etc. Dont pay too much attention to those types of writeups.
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #14  
dencio83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 273
From: West Richland, WA
Default

whats the "Toyota Scion tC" is it a new car?

anyway I think I'm good those airbags better work
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #15  
shadow12one's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,285
From: Palatine, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by dencio83
whats the "Toyota Scion tC" is it a new car?

anyway I think I'm good those airbags better work
It must be the JDM version
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #16  
hunterUnknown's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,478
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

i dont think its justified to call a car unsafe when they're basing it on an option.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 12:55 AM
  #17  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

I say its jusified to call a car unsafe if something is wrong with it, calling it unsafe by not making a safety option like a SAB standard is just not right after all even if you have all the safety feature and the safest vehicle still there is no guarantee that you will have no serious injury.. no accident is safe to make it short.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 01:16 AM
  #18  
shadow12one's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,285
From: Palatine, Illinois
Default

^^ Yup. Its not so much about certain safety features being optional like SAB. Its about how well a vehicle is able to absorb the force of the impact while still protecting the driver and passengers inside. Marking a vehicle safe or unsafe shouldnt be about which features are options and which are standard. In all honesty, a car can have all the airbags it could possibly fit but that wont mean a thing if the design and engineering of the car isnt able to handle the force of the crash. Thats what they should really be basing their article on.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 01:26 AM
  #19  
Deathwish238's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Club One
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 882
From: Austin, TX
Default

Okay...so many cars don't come with ABS standard. imo ABS is much more important than side airbags.
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 01:43 AM
  #20  
eliXion's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 352
From: NJ
Default

I was in a really bad accident with my first tC where a lady ran a red an T-Boned me and my girlfriend. The cops there said if it wasnt for that car and the side air bag my girlfriend would have died. And they've seen plenty of accidents.



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 AM.