Pictures of Spirit, my '05 SCION xA
Thread Starter
Senior Member



Fail, INC
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,350
From: Here at my desk...
um. Yeah. Okay. Here is the deal. I had my guys at Good Roads (more then twenty years in the tire/rim biz), do the math, knowing that I did not want to lose much MPG. And they did.
Like I said, a minor difference in the size overall, with little width difference.
And the truth is in the pudding: 37.8 MPG before the switch, 37.1 MPG after. So, I am happy with that little loss.
Like I said, a minor difference in the size overall, with little width difference.
And the truth is in the pudding: 37.8 MPG before the switch, 37.1 MPG after. So, I am happy with that little loss.
Senior Member



Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Originally Posted by TJandBOXCARWILLIE
um. Yeah. Okay. Here is the deal. I had my guys at Good Roads (more then twenty years in the tire/rim biz), do the math, knowing that I did not want to lose much MPG. And they did.
Like I said, a minor difference in the size overall, with little width difference.
And the truth is in the pudding: 37.8 MPG before the switch, 37.1 MPG after. So, I am happy with that little loss.
Like I said, a minor difference in the size overall, with little width difference.
And the truth is in the pudding: 37.8 MPG before the switch, 37.1 MPG after. So, I am happy with that little loss.
And yes, I'm sure they have lots of experience installing tires and SELLING them all day long. I really doubth they really sit around pondering the efficiency energy losses of wheel radiuses. If anything, larger rims cost more, and they'll do whatever it takes to sell them and make $$$. . . vs me. . . I'm doing this for free. No personal gain here.
There calculations may/may not affect real world experience. The fact remains that hybrids consume the most gasoline during acceleration. And the fact that rotational inertia is a major factor in acceleration means that it is going to affect MPG.
But hey, if the dealer equipped the car with wheels that inefficient, you could see a significant increase in MPG and acceleration by downsizing. . . lol. . . which I don't think you'd be interested in.
But yeah, you did it for aesthetics. That's cool. And it looks good. I'm not trying to rain on your parade or anything like that, just makin sure that you were aware. That's all.[/i]
Thread Starter
Senior Member



Fail, INC
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,350
From: Here at my desk...
Originally Posted by djct_watt
Originally Posted by TJandBOXCARWILLIE
um. Yeah. Okay. Here is the deal. I had my guys at Good Roads (more then twenty years in the tire/rim biz), do the math, knowing that I did not want to lose much MPG. And they did.
Like I said, a minor difference in the size overall, with little width difference.
And the truth is in the pudding: 37.8 MPG before the switch, 37.1 MPG after. So, I am happy with that little loss.
Like I said, a minor difference in the size overall, with little width difference.
And the truth is in the pudding: 37.8 MPG before the switch, 37.1 MPG after. So, I am happy with that little loss.
It's plausible that the loss is minute, assuming you found a light weight and not-too-wide width 18" rim. But the truth is the truth, upsizing reduces power and decreases MPG.
And yes, I'm sure they have lots of experience installing tires and SELLING them all day long.
If anything, larger rims cost more, and they'll do whatever it takes to sell them and make $$$. . . vs me. . . I'm doing this for free. No personal gain here.
There calculations may/may not affect real world experience. The fact remains that hybrids consume the most gasoline during acceleration.
But yeah, you did it for aesthetics. That's cool.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade or anything like that, just makin sure that you were aware. That's all.
Heck, a friend and I are thinking of a major project, of taking a '65 Mustang, and putting a hybrid system in it. Now that should be something.
Senior Member



Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
On safety's note, you could go for a smaller diameter tire with the same width and quality tire. . . it would have done the same. Plus sizing drastically increases braking distances.
Again, all safety and performance increases can be addressed by tire quality and and width.
Also, FYI, hydroplaning is a function of how much water your tire displaces (a function of speed and width). Going wider increases the liklihood of hydroplaning. However, by choosing tires with a smaller contact patch or better water channeling design, you can do the same (which is likely what happened when you switched to the new tires on the 18's).
I'm not trying to get you to stop tricking out your car. But there's the truth and then there are rumors. It's purely an aesthetic upgrade (and it looks good, and I'm all for it).
My main goal was to convey that you will lose some MPG and HP. The main losses will be during city driving. Cruising and highway driving will feel a smaller impact.
And yes. . . all Toyota tires suck! They opt for low rolling resistance tires which suck in all conditions of driving. It's best to get those nasty things off the car ASAP.
Again, all safety and performance increases can be addressed by tire quality and and width.
Also, FYI, hydroplaning is a function of how much water your tire displaces (a function of speed and width). Going wider increases the liklihood of hydroplaning. However, by choosing tires with a smaller contact patch or better water channeling design, you can do the same (which is likely what happened when you switched to the new tires on the 18's).
I'm not trying to get you to stop tricking out your car. But there's the truth and then there are rumors. It's purely an aesthetic upgrade (and it looks good, and I'm all for it).
My main goal was to convey that you will lose some MPG and HP. The main losses will be during city driving. Cruising and highway driving will feel a smaller impact.
And yes. . . all Toyota tires suck! They opt for low rolling resistance tires which suck in all conditions of driving. It's best to get those nasty things off the car ASAP.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
minter66
PPC: Vehicles
0
Dec 15, 2014 01:45 PM





