Notices
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Drivetrain & Power Engine and transmission discussions...

huh @ the blitz S/C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2004, 05:04 PM
  #1  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default huh @ the blitz S/C

whats the deal with the blitz S/C

and why is most ppl giving it bad reviews

whats wrong with it

besides costing around $3k for it...
jct is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 06:42 PM
  #2  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
DelMarVa
 
BoomBox757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 1,962
Default

it costs 3g and doesn't add that much horsepower. its the lack of poser that youget for 3g
BoomBox757 is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Member
5 Year Member
 
Littleguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Default

But what you do get is reliability (supposedly). $3K to boost an n/a car safely isn't really that bad.
Littleguy is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 08:19 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
smurf3642's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indian River CO. - Florid
Posts: 414
Default

where's a link to this product?
smurf3642 is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 08:24 PM
  #5  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
DelMarVa
 
BoomBox757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 1,962
Default

you can read more about it here.
https://www.scionlife.com/parts/revi...&sub_cat_id=32

what I heard is that is about between 20 and 30 hp.
BoomBox757 is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 09:10 PM
  #6  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

its better then nothing, i rather go with the blitz S/C since it does have the elctro clutch for the S/C anyways

i want it more then a turbo anyday cause i find the coolness factor is lot better anyways
jct is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 11:35 PM
  #7  
Member
5 Year Member
 
bdatws1_at_hotmail_com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 37
Default Re: huh @ the blitz S/C

Originally Posted by hornet_on_flower
whats the deal with the blitz S/C

and why is most ppl giving it bad reviews

whats wrong with it

besides costing around $3k for it...

Where did you see these 'bad' reviews? The 3 reviews that are actually in the 'Parts' section are pretty much glowing.
bdatws1_at_hotmail_com is offline  
Old 12-19-2004, 12:05 AM
  #8  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

on the boards and else where on here but not the reviews no
jct is offline  
Old 12-21-2004, 04:37 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
eeyoredragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 197
Default

On a mildly related note, whoever is in charge needs to remove the reviews for the TRD charger for the tC. Seeing as how it's not out yet, they obviously can't rate it. Not only that, but anyone who rates a product low and simply states "turbos have more coolness factor" should be drug into the street and shot until they either come to their senses or die *shrug*
eeyoredragon is offline  
Old 12-21-2004, 04:58 AM
  #10  
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scinergy
IV ACE
 
showpaojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: W. Covina, CA
Posts: 1,478
Default

Well that's a unique way to put it.

But pretty much as others have said, it's low power output for what you spend and isn't upgradeable unless you get a custom pulley made and Blitz won't do that. you're basically stuck with all the NA expensive mods once you've gone with the supercharger.

It's more for show cars because Blitz is high points when it comes to name brand forced induction setups but superchargers still don't get as many points as a name brand Turbo setup. Even if you go with a basic custom turbo kit, that's not up there in points with a brand name turbo kit like Greddy or HKS.
showpaojoe is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 03:15 AM
  #11  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

they way i see it if you say this s/c come with only low end power how low are you talking about at what rpm range band

i like the sounds of low end power alot the best i've seen or should i say i was impressed by was a 58 chrysler 392 with a GMC 6-71 roots blower that was cranking out 1200 hp at 2300 rpms now thats f**kin sweet ___
jct is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:22 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
hotbox05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Posts: 13,706
Default

well most s/c's start boost around 1500. so pretty low depends on how the system is set up and the motor.
hotbox05 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 02:02 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
dgHotLava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fortress of ScioNRG
Posts: 5,274
Default

Originally Posted by hotbox05
well most s/c's start boost around 1500. so pretty low depends on how the system is set up and the motor.
remember that superchargers are parasitic...
they take power to make power..
so, while they can start making boost low in the RPM's, it takes a little more to nagate the losses.
by 2500-3000RPM you notice the diff....
dgHotLava is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 05:43 PM
  #14  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

huh, pls go more into detail
jct is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:56 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
dgHotLava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fortress of ScioNRG
Posts: 5,274
Default

more detail on what???
dgHotLava is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 09:40 PM
  #16  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

on what you just said

didn't quite under stand this part "it takes a little more to nagate the losses. by 2500-3000RPM you notice the diff"
jct is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 10:13 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
rotarycolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by hornet_on_flower
on what you just said

didn't quite under stand this part "it takes a little more to nagate the losses. by 2500-3000RPM you notice the diff"
It takes power to make power... usually the gain isn't that much @ lower RPM, since the boost isn't as high (with centrifugals).
rotarycolt is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 11:08 PM
  #18  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

ooooooohhhhhhhhhhhh i seeee now sorry takes me a little while to figure things out thats still lot better then the higher rpm range band



i don't really like centrifugals s/c anyways the coolness factor just isn't there in my book

the way i see it should be popping out/poking thru the hood or wtih hillborn injectors

but the sleeper look is the way to go most of the time
jct is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 11:45 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
hotbox05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Posts: 13,706
Default

yeah i suppose that a roots type is "cooler" a centrifugal sure does yield more power. (normally)
hotbox05 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 11:52 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
dgHotLava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fortress of ScioNRG
Posts: 5,274
Default

Originally Posted by hornet_on_flower
the way i see it should be popping out/poking thru the hood or wtih hillborn injectors
wouldn't that look silly sittin' sideways????
dgHotLava is offline  


Quick Reply: huh @ the blitz S/C



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 PM.