Notices
Scion xA/xB 1st-Gen Suspension & Handling Coilovers, Shocks, Airbags, Swaybars...

i hope this isnt bad....(yes...theres pix)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #21  
Prototype_xB's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,113
From: Goldsboro, NC
Default

Originally Posted by KevinxB
Never been a fan of the ultra-cambered VIP/JDM look. But, the body kit and tails on that white xB are awesome.
Ditto
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #22  
BlueBubble666's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 147
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SuperToaster
OOOOOOO I REALLY like the two tone white one. That is nice. Maybe I will get that kit someday..... who makes it? The cambering looks retarded and like you broke an axle...... Not feelin it......
That's what i'm thinking. Since when did gnarly negative camber become the in thing? I'm on your boat with this one.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #23  
bblhed's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 189
From: Earth
Default

The rear suspension in xB's and xA's is the same cheep "semi indipendant" POS. Basicly the rear of the car is a trailer pulled by the front wheels. There is NO CAMBER ADJUSTMENT on this type of rear end unless you bend the rear end. So yup, the cars you show in those pictures are in fact busted. Sorry, that much negative camber is too much, it is the result of running wide rear wheel drive offset rims on an axel that was designed for front drive offset rims. The $900 to replace the rear axel would look better as the right rims on the car in the first place.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #24  
dAbOkZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 200
From: gaithersburg, MD
Default

too bad....how long u think those cars would last with busted up rear axles?
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #25  
bBOXD's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 739
From: HELLO! :)
Default

Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
the wheels are like that because the box is on bags....

when the car is lowered to the max with the bags, the wheels angle themself. the wheels have negative camber

negative camber is bad on the tires, but the pictures shown above, the boxes will not drive like that, they will raise the car to make it at a drivable highest, with the proper camber
Sorry but you could not be any further from the truth! You do not know what you are talking about. The rears are not like that because of BAGS!

The rears are cambered because of Camber Shims. Camber shims are installed to achieved the Camber'd look. No matter how low you drop the rear of an xa or xb there are no camber issues. Camber is used to fit wider wheels that usallly wont fit without camber. And mostly camber is used for aesthetics. They run camber on purpose. Its not because of the rear suspension.

Furthermore, Camber alone does not make tires wear badly, it is a combination of bad toe and camber that eats up tires.

Please do not spread things you know nothing about. You are misleading people into believing false things.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #26  
sarcasmkillsme's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 197
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by bBOXD
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
the wheels are like that because the box is on bags....

when the car is lowered to the max with the bags, the wheels angle themself. the wheels have negative camber

negative camber is bad on the tires, but the pictures shown above, the boxes will not drive like that, they will raise the car to make it at a drivable highest, with the proper camber
Sorry but you could not be any further from the truth! You do not know what you are talking about. The rears are not like that because of BAGS!

The rears are cambered because of Camber Shims. Camber shims are installed to achieved the Camber'd look. No matter how low you drop the rear of an xa or xb there are no camber issues. Camber is used to fit wider wheels that usallly wont fit without camber. And mostly camber is used for aesthetics. They run camber on purpose. Its not because of the rear suspension.

Furthermore, Camber alone does not make tires wear badly, it is a combination of bad toe and camber that eats up tires.

Please do not spread things you know nothing about. You are misleading people into believing false things.
bBoxd, you beat me to it. Maybe BrEaK_AwaY shouldn't share his 'universal' car knowledge when he knows nothing about the specific model car in question.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #27  
hamads's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 99
From: Aiea, HI
Default

i agree with bboxd. if it were fully independant rear suspension then it might do that...but on xb's its like running an axle so theres no camber whatsoever no matter how much you raise or lower your car...think of it as 4 wheel trucks using a straight front (axle) thats so they dont have to fool around with camber issues
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #28  
stick_1NZ's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,993
From: Abra, Philippines
Default

well-worded bboxd.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 11:45 PM
  #29  
BrEaK_AwaY's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,372
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

sigh, i do know what i am talking about.

we all know the toe is the main reason for tire ware... not camber. MOST vehicles wheels get that camber when on bags and are compeltely lowered. In this case I did not know it wasnt like that for the xB, so excuse me for trying to be of some help. It is unecessary to go off like that. Im sure i have just as much knowledge on suspension as you do. You own an xB, there for you know the camber on it well more than I do, same for me with a tC...
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 04:07 AM
  #30  
khaye's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 248
From: San Diego, CA
Default

not to be mean but, just a thought...maybe next time if you're not sure about a particular subject, don't answer. giving out wrong info is worse than admitting you don't know....hey bboxd, are you running the otg camber shims?
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 04:24 AM
  #31  
Boxer_Rebellion's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,556
From: Birthplace of Speedo, USA
Default

Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
the wheels are like that because the box is on bags....

when the car is lowered to the max with the bags, the wheels angle themself. the wheels have negative camber

negative camber is bad on the tires, but the pictures shown above, the boxes will not drive like that, they will raise the car to make it at a drivable highest, with the proper camber
Are you saying that the airbag controller somehow also changes the camber based on ride height? Now that WOULD be trick!

Dumba$$.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #32  
BrEaK_AwaY's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,372
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Boxer_Rebellion
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
the wheels are like that because the box is on bags....

when the car is lowered to the max with the bags, the wheels angle themself. the wheels have negative camber

negative camber is bad on the tires, but the pictures shown above, the boxes will not drive like that, they will raise the car to make it at a drivable highest, with the proper camber
Are you saying that the airbag controller somehow also changes the camber based on ride height? Now that WOULD be trick!

Dumba$$.
go look at an suv on bags and see what happens....
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #33  
dAbOkZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 200
From: gaithersburg, MD
Default

now i dont know who to believe..
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 04:33 PM
  #34  
Dewmerz's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 760
From: ScionMafia
Default

Go read https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...504&highlight= . Van is making camber shims here in the US now. There is some good information on the toe correction to reduce tire wear.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #35  
bBOXD's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 739
From: HELLO! :)
Default

Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
Originally Posted by Boxer_Rebellion
Originally Posted by BrEaK_AwaY
the wheels are like that because the box is on bags....

when the car is lowered to the max with the bags, the wheels angle themself. the wheels have negative camber

negative camber is bad on the tires, but the pictures shown above, the boxes will not drive like that, they will raise the car to make it at a drivable highest, with the proper camber
Are you saying that the airbag controller somehow also changes the camber based on ride height? Now that WOULD be trick!

Dumba$$.
go look at an suv on bags and see what happens....
Bro can you please do everyone a favor and STOP! You keep on trying to make a recovery to prove that you know this and that, when in fact you DONT KNOW! Do we drive SUV's?!?!?! HUH? do we?

You are confusing a lot of people here. You already look incredibly stupid and are just digging yourself deeper. Just stop already. There is nothing more for you to prove. Just take it as a learning experience and stop trying to turn it around to somehow make yourself seam right. YOU WERE WRONG! Deal with it and move on.


**FINAL ANSWER to clarify this for everyone**- The rears of Xa's and Xb's will not Camber in no matter how low you drop the car, whether it is on Bags or Coilovers or Springs. Camber is achieved in the rear through Camber shims that are installed behind the Hubs. Lowering your rear will only affect your Toe and not Camber.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 07:49 PM
  #36  
ptmccain's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 178
Default

One word: ugly,ugly, ugly.

Just when I think the xB can't get any uglier, somebody goes and makes it uglier.

Yuck.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #37  
dAbOkZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 200
From: gaithersburg, MD
Default

dont have an xb geniouse?way to diss ur own car.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #38  
dAbOkZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 200
From: gaithersburg, MD
Default

both of them
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 12:00 AM
  #39  
Sittin_Pretti_Box's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 475
From: Everett, WA
Default

xA's and xB's have STRAIGHT axles. no way to get camber except for an IRS or camber plates. there's your answer.

And when was having camber known as "VIP"?
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 12:01 AM
  #40  
KevinxB's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,356
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Sittin_Pretti_Box
And when was having camber known as "VIP"?
Since it became the newest spinoff of the JDM fad.



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25 AM.