Monroe Sensa-Trac issue
#24
Originally Posted by designed24
xB may be 85lbs more than xA but the echo's 300 lbs less than the xA and 400 than the xB....
The xB weighs 2,425 lbs.
The xA weighs 2,340 lbs.
The Echo weighs 2,085 ibs.
#25
Originally Posted by trndmnky
Originally Posted by pdrizzle
Crap, does anyone know if this is the case with the Koni struts?
#26
I already have the Sensa-Tracs on my xB and am pursuing the H-Tech's becuase there seemed to be quite a few here running that combination. I did a search on "Tein and Tech and Monroe" and found this thread from December that has a pic showing the difference between the stock & Monroe struts:
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...in+tech+monroe
https://www.scionlife.com/forums/vie...in+tech+monroe
#27
The top photo shows the SensaTrac is about 1/4 inch shorter, and shows the progressive winding of the Tein spring which should make it softer at first. Quite different looking.
The top and bottom photos show the rubber dust cover of the SensaTrac has not been clamped to the shock with a zip tie yet.
The top and bottom photos show the rubber dust cover of the SensaTrac has not been clamped to the shock with a zip tie yet.
#28
Originally Posted by vintage42
The top and bottom photos show the rubber dust cover of the SensaTrac has not been clamped to the shock with a zip tie yet.
#29
Originally Posted by phillycaster
Originally Posted by vintage42
The top and bottom photos show the rubber dust cover of the SensaTrac has not been clamped to the shock with a zip tie yet.
#30
Originally Posted by xB_Factor
... The Monores do not come with dust boots. You just reuse the the OE boots and there's no need to zip-tie the bottom.
The rear SensaTracs for my xB came with no dust boots, because the xB dust boots are plastic and are part of the car not the shock.
#31
The factory dust boot is not meant to be secured at the bottom. The rubber material it's made of doesn't seem to have the ability to stretch much vertically. IMO, trying to secure it would either, not hold and/or would tear the boot.
#32
Awesome thread. Learning a lot from all the post. So let me get this straight. The monroe shocks are dropping XB's about a 1/2 in. in the front, giving it the "demon" dropped look, correct?
I've been working on cars for about 7 years now and have always used Tokico shocks on all my past vehicles (91 CRX, 92 Honda Accord) and combined them with Eibach springs. This is the first I have ever heard of enthusiasts using Monroe shocks/struts mated with a lowering spring. I always thought Monroes were made for factory height vehicles. Can these Monroes handle the abuse a lowered ride will throw @ it? I'm confused now. I thought Koni & Tokico's were made specifically for lowered cars to handle the abuse?? Are monroes better than Tokico's & Koni's??
Sorri XB_Factor not trien to HiJack your thread. You guys just seem really knowledgeable about suspension tuning.
I've been working on cars for about 7 years now and have always used Tokico shocks on all my past vehicles (91 CRX, 92 Honda Accord) and combined them with Eibach springs. This is the first I have ever heard of enthusiasts using Monroe shocks/struts mated with a lowering spring. I always thought Monroes were made for factory height vehicles. Can these Monroes handle the abuse a lowered ride will throw @ it? I'm confused now. I thought Koni & Tokico's were made specifically for lowered cars to handle the abuse?? Are monroes better than Tokico's & Koni's??
Sorri XB_Factor not trien to HiJack your thread. You guys just seem really knowledgeable about suspension tuning.
#33
Originally Posted by KenzokuXB
... The monroe shocks are dropping XB's about a 1/2 in. in the front... I always thought Monroes were made for factory height vehicles. Can these Monroes handle the abuse a lowered ride... I thought Koni & Tokico's were made specifically for lowered cars to handle the abuse?? Are monroes better than Tokico's & Koni's?? ...
Monroe is a division of Tenneco, who has SensaTracs made abroad. Tenneco also sells SensaTracs under the NAPA, Sear Midas and other brands.
Shorter:
From this photo, it looks like the SensaTrac strut on the rght is less than 1/2 shorter than the OEM Tokico strut on the left, whether looking at the top or the spring seat:
http://s49.photobucket.com/albums/f2...sSensaTrac.jpg
Lowering:
Monroe Sensatrac shocks and struts have a tapered groove machined into the inside housing. While the piston is in the groove, the ride is soft and comfortable, but when the piston travels above or below the groove, during rough roads or severe handling, the valving stiffens up. If the ride is lowered enough to get the piston out of the grooved area, the ride would become hard.
http://www.shockwarehouse.com/site/mon_sense.cfm
Application:
Alll the SensaTrac and Koni shocks and struts that we are using for the xB are listed in the product catalogs for the Echo application. The xB is too recent to appear in the aftermarket supplier catalogs.
Best:
As to which strut or shock is better, it depends on what you want and what you want to pay. The OEM rear KYB is a hard shock, perhaps selected for good handling with a full load. The OEM front Tokico is about right for most people, but a little firm for others. The rear SensaTrac is softer than the KYB and a good match for the front Tokico. Koni shocks and struts are adjustable from plush soft to rock hard. The Konis are the best, due to their high quality and adjustability to any setting.
Cost:
Rear SensaTracs shocks are about $75/pair.
Front SensaTrac struts are about $150/pair.
Rear Koni shocks are about $200/pair.
Front Koni struts are about $350/pair.
#37
So is it possible the monroes are only working with lowered springs because they are brand new and haven't been ridin on for months yet? Depending on your drop (mine is with STechs) it is possible that the strut may sit outside this groove area correct?
#38
Originally Posted by KenzokuXB
So is it possible the monroes are only working with lowered springs because they are brand new and haven't been ridin on for months yet?...
Originally Posted by KenzokuXB
... Depending on your drop (mine is with STechs) it is possible that the strut may sit outside this groove area correct?
The question is how hard is a SensaTrac when the piston goes outside the grooves? Does the ungrooved area provide the same firmness as an ungrooved (Tockico) strut, or is it unusually stiff to act as a bumper? Since people are not complaining about using SensaTracs with Teins, the first case is probably true.
#39
Originally Posted by vintage42
The question is how hard is a SensaTrac when the piston goes outside the grooves? Does the ungrooved area provide the same firmness as an ungrooved (Tockico) strut, or is it unusually stiff to act as a bumper? Since people are not complaining about using SensaTracs with Teins, the first case is probably true.
I'll report what I learn after installing Tein H-Tech's on my xA.
#40
I have sensatracs on all fours w/s-techs and have no problems with ride height and shock travel. It rides tamer than lowering springs on stocks and coils. After messing around with the suspension for a while, I think this is the best combo for a good price.
I would recommend to the poster to check the Tien springs to see if they are original parts. There has been a rash of incidents of Scion owners with fake Tein springs.
I would recommend to the poster to check the Tien springs to see if they are original parts. There has been a rash of incidents of Scion owners with fake Tein springs.