Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

282 miles on full tank

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #61  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

yeah easiest way it from full to half or full to 1/4
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #62  
crestronwizard's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 49
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I drive 80mph on the hwy and a good deal of city. I still avg 300 miles plus to a tank.
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 06:02 AM
  #63  
TJandBOXCARWILLIE's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,350
From: Here at my desk...
Default

I have gas right now...wait. We are not talking about that kind of gas.

Sorry.
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 07:19 AM
  #64  
cameracar's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 167
From: VA
Default

Theoretically a lowered box should get better milage because less air would travel beneath the vehicle and all of those unsmooth surfaces and adding drag.

You know the longer this discussion goes the more I'm beginning to remember and get ticked off about the xB gas milage. I had a 1986, 124WB Ford Econoline with a 4-speed on the floor that got 28 MPG after I put an airdam on the front!:? :? :?
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #65  
bB384's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
IV ACE
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 600
From: North Hollywood, So. Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by cameracar
Theoretically a lowered box should get better milage because less air would travel beneath the vehicle and all of those unsmooth surfaces and adding drag.

You know the longer this discussion goes the more I'm beginning to remember and get ticked off about the xB gas milage. I had a 1986, 124WB Ford Econoline with a 4-speed on the floor that got 28 MPG after I put an airdam on the front!:? :? :?
I wasn't saying lowering the car upsets fuel economy, rather lowering the car upsets your fuel guage reading.
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #66  
cameracar's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 167
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by bB384
I wasn't saying lowering the car upsets fuel economy, rather lowering the car upsets your fuel guage reading.
I was throwing in my 2 cents. But if the car is still level how would the gauge be affected?
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #67  
uncompiled's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 698
From: DC/MD/VA
Default

He was saying that some people are not level, such as with the Tein S-tech, Hotchkis, or RSR springs. For example, the RSR drop is about 2" in the front and 1.2" in the rear. That's a pretty noticable difference.

But of course, when you fill up the gas tank and it says you only used 8 gallons... even if your trip meter only says 260, you're still getting over 30 MPG, so that's really a moot point.

You know, EPA estimates are never right. People keep freaking out about how they're not getting 60MPG in their Priuses, but they should just get over it. There are just too many factors that come into play: driving style, location, temperature, load, modifications, thermonucleic proton deflecting particle density dividends... ;)
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #68  
Scionic_Librarian's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by uncompiled
You know, EPA estimates are never right. People keep freaking out about how they're not getting 60MPG in their Priuses, but they should just get over it. ;)
Just like why we bought a Scion.. style, safety, etc etc etc..
If you live downtown and drive in bumper to bumper all the time, get a Prius. Save money. If you live in the boondocks and drive 80 MPH, don't complain that it's the same mileage as... oh, lemme take a shot.. a Civic?
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #69  
cmdxb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 749
From: Scikotics Jax!
Default

Originally Posted by Scionic Librarian
Originally Posted by uncompiled
You know, EPA estimates are never right. People keep freaking out about how they're not getting 60MPG in their Priuses, but they should just get over it. ;)
Just like why we bought a Scion.. style, safety, etc etc etc..
If you live downtown and drive in bumper to bumper all the time, get a Prius. Save money. If you live in the boondocks and drive 80 MPH, don't complain that it's the same mileage as... oh, lemme take a shot.. a Civic?
my civic got over 30 mpg even after 225000 miles.....the box BARELY gets 27 in florida, no hills, expressway 80 % of the time....all under 4 thou rpms....

and for the record, i saw Mytbusters lastnight (caught tail end of it) and they ran 2 of the same casrs around a track one with A/c one w out it on.....the one WITH got 8 MILES less to the tank..NOT a very noticeable diff....just wanted to throw that out there...didnt feel like rereading 3 pages of posts...
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #70  
casian_asian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Default ha

got 200miles on a half tank yesterday, switched to lower octane runnin on 87 now
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #71  
K9_Crate's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 62
From: Alameda, CA
Default

I have been disappointed with MPG since day one. My gevetching is well documented in the archives.

I have stock everything -automatic - have yet to modify the interior as I want. Usually I'm the only one in the car (170 lbs). I keep the tire pressure at 36 psi. I drive like a granny (70 and under) and have never redlined it.

MPG sucks and is getting worse. During break-in (up to 3000 miles) I was averaging 29 miles per gallon, Now, at 5000 miles I'm getting 27 mpg. I live in California, so its not like my car is freezing at night and lowering the milage.
I calculate milage at each fill (# miles / gals)

I typically get 240 -290 miles per tank and fill up at 1/4 tank.

I'm very jealous of folks who are getting better gas milage than I.
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 10:28 PM
  #72  
Gonzo_xb's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 210
From: Baltimore, Md
Default

[Yea that is about what I get. I am half way through my gas and I am at 150miles. For some reason I expected it to be more since my Saturn gets the same mileage and I thought my Saturn sucked but I guess I never did the math.]

how big is your tank in the Saturn compared to the scion? You may get the same number of miles per tank, but I'll bet the Saturn costs more to fill up. [/quote]
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 01:47 AM
  #73  
rallyxb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 388
From: New York
Default Re: I got 320 or more sometimes...

Originally Posted by caliman
I purchased a airsensor chip mod for my 2005 Scion xB for $8.00 Including shipping and installed it and my miles per gallon skyrocketed! I dont know what it is but I go a week or more on a full tank when befor I filled twice a week. I would recomend this resistor chip, its cheap, it safe, it adds 14-20 horsepower and U get better gas milage. My theory is that the xB is heavy for that small engine and our stock engines and sensores don't let enough oxegen and gas into the engine to push it up to a satisfactory speed with a low rpm. so this modification increases intake = horsepower without shooting up rpms burning more gas per second. i purchased this item from ebay it came with simple instrucionas and its simple to install! Please ask me any questions.
Interesting claims CaliMan but a lot of people here seem to disagree.
Please prove us wrong and provide data and links to information.
We would love to have a product that can boost our MPG and HP.
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 02:54 AM
  #74  
Davestoaster's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 506
From: McDonald, PA
Default

33 mpg's today. Used a calculator.
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #75  
cameracar's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 167
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by uncompiled
You know, EPA estimates are never right. People keep freaking out about how they're not getting 60MPG in their Priuses, but they should just get over it. There are just too many factors that come into play: driving style, location, temperature, load, modifications, thermonucleic proton deflecting particle density dividends... ;)
I know someone getting 75MPG in a Prius...he never drives long enough going to work for the gas engine to start up...but thanks to rush hour on the way home taking 35 minutes it gets charged up.
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #76  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

i just got 290 on a full tank. wouldda been like 330 or more but i decided to race some peeps and drive like a jackass. so u know. i got 190 miles at half tank but then i started driving like a dumbass so ya know.
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 06:30 PM
  #77  
TheScionicMan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,736
From: In the Hot Tub
Default

Originally Posted by K9 Crate
I live in California,
Cali gas is oxygenated to burn cleaner, but it cuts the mileage...
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #78  
caliman's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 101
From: Laguna Hills, Ca
Default ummm

Originally Posted by TheScionicMan
Originally Posted by Scionic Librarian
Any tech guys/gals have an opinion on the airsensor chip mentioned above? I've heard this on a commercial.. but wondering if it's legit..
Do you honestly think some guy on eBay figured out something that is UNIVERSAL to all cars yet the car makers with their millions in R&D couldn't do with their OWN engines? And even if Professor eBay did find this miracle cure, why wouldn't the car makers just add it for $8 bucks and gain all this HP that is very important to some carshoppers?

C'mon, use your common sense, do you really think you'll gain 15-20 horse power and at the same time use LESS gas? From a generic resistor that's going to outsmart the very intricate ECU?

Look at it another way, what if your engine chunks after using it for a month because the air/fuel ratio has been altered. What's their guarantee? Oh yeah, they'll give you your $8 back. You can just hand it over to your dealer with the rest out of your pocket...

JMO, but think about it...
ummmm its called regulated emissions! they program the computer to use the least amount of air/gas ratio to reduce emissions wich results in low air/gas intake ratio which results less horsepower. Its simple but logical! Don't deny the chemisty of things untill you proove it ineffective. I notice a huge differance in my car. If you wanna try it I'll send you one. just so you can see if it works!!!
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 07:04 PM
  #79  
caliman's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 101
From: Laguna Hills, Ca
Default Chip mod

This chip is placed between the air sensor and harness. what this 3.3ohm resistor does is sends a signal to the computer that air is currently 32 degree's. pushing more gasoline and air into your car will not effect your engine. This mod does not make your engine light turn on like other chips do. Jet chips cuase engine problems, overwhelming signals for heavier gas / air ratio's. Plus they are all different specs for different cars. xB require 3.3ohm resistors. this is a simple change in engine chemistly letting the engine computer do the rest of the calculations! This chip is easy to instal and remove. all you need is electrical tape and 10 minutes to the let the engine run. I'm willing to send 5 sample chips to your guys as long as you give me your feedback!!! first five must pm me to get on the list!
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #80  
glenbrrr's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 134
From: Kensington, CT
Default

Originally Posted by K9 Crate
I have been disappointed with MPG since day one. My gevetching is well documented in the archives.

I have stock everything -automatic - have yet to modify the interior as I want. Usually I'm the only one in the car (170 lbs). I keep the tire pressure at 36 psi. I drive like a granny (70 and under) and have never redlined it.

MPG sucks and is getting worse. During break-in (up to 3000 miles) I was averaging 29 miles per gallon, Now, at 5000 miles I'm getting 27 mpg. I live in California, so its not like my car is freezing at night and lowering the milage.
I calculate milage at each fill (# miles / gals)

I typically get 240 -290 miles per tank and fill up at 1/4 tank.

I'm very jealous of folks who are getting better gas milage than I.
240-290 miles per 3/4 tank is 30-36 MPG (using 8 gallons as a divider)

I filled up for the second time, and averaged 31 MPG. Only have 538 miles of the box.



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 PM.