Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

CAI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #21  
TheLeprechaun's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
From: Madison/Whitewater, WI
Default

ScionPimpN -

Thanks for the info, it's very helpful. Your opinion on the AEM intake further backs my opinion that they are a waste of money. As I stated before, the "harmonic tuning" may make a difference, but it's minimal and when you consider horsepower/buck, it's definitely not a good deal. I agree though, they do look great.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #22  
sithscripter's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 356
From: North County, SD
Default

Street price on the AEM just dropped to about $200 ... just not at dealerships.

I've also seen a GReddy intake advertised in the $110 range.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #23  
ScionPimpN's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Leprechaun- Glad I could help
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 07:55 PM
  #24  
AKgoalie7's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 501
From: My-Am-Eeeeee
Default

Originally Posted by sithscripter
Street price on the AEM just dropped to about $200 ... just not at dealerships.

I've also seen a GReddy intake advertised in the $110 range.

200 bucks for the AEM??? where??? Ive seen pics of the AEM for 200, but it doesn't seem to be the one with the air bypass and stuff....

http://www.hopupracing.com/scion.html

^^^ the AEM there looks short ram.....???? no ????



i'm confused now...
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #25  
TheLeprechaun's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
From: Madison/Whitewater, WI
Default

Is hydrolock really that big of a problem?


I guess it depends on exactly where the intake is placed. But do you really think that if you don't have that air/water bypass valve that you have a significantly increased chance of getting hydrolock?

I'm new to this, so I may be full of crap, but from what I've been reading so far, the AEM intake is one of the more expensive intakes and it doesn't see as big of a power increase as some of the less expensive intakes. I guess if you're buying on looks alone and money is no barrier for you, then go for it. But it seems to me a differnet intake is a better choice.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #26  
SoCalbBox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 195
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by AKgoalie7
Originally Posted by sithscripter
Street price on the AEM just dropped to about $200 ... just not at dealerships.

I've also seen a GReddy intake advertised in the $110 range.

200 bucks for the AEM??? where??? Ive seen pics of the AEM for 200, but it doesn't seem to be the one with the air bypass and stuff....

http://www.hopupracing.com/scion.html

^^^ the AEM there looks short ram.....???? no ????




i'm confused now...
That's not the same one Toyota sells. This is xB only.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #27  
SoCalbBox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 195
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by TheLeprechaun
ScionPimpN -

Thanks for the info, it's very helpful. Your opinion on the AEM intake further backs my opinion that they are a waste of money. As I stated before, the "harmonic tuning" may make a difference, but it's minimal and when you consider horsepower/buck, it's definitely not a good deal. I agree though, they do look great.
Both AEM intakes are tuned differently. The one that is sold by Toyota has safety over horsepower. Tuning is sacrificed in the design to allow for a bypass valve and proper routing of the stock hoses.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #28  
ScionPimpN's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Hydrolocking has been a subject of debate for sometime. But for such , one would think a serious problem. Who would of thought that AEM would be the only one to take notice and offer a bypassvalve for there intake systems. Now ive never hydrolocked my engine before, but i had a coldair intake on my focus and never had a problem with rain or water. I believe in someways a myth something to bring up and seel a product. Now not to say that hydrolocking hasnt happened but unless your in a flood I dont see a bypass valve a nesecity. Like I said 30+ intake companies make intake systems for cars and 1 has a bypass valve you be the judge if you need it
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 10:37 PM
  #29  
TheLeprechaun's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
From: Madison/Whitewater, WI
Default

Originally Posted by AEM Website
AEM’s patented air bypass valve virtually eliminates the chance of hydro-lock in the event the filter of your AEM Cold Air induction system becomes submerged in water.

...

The bypass valve may cause a slight loss in power due to the interrupted wall section created by the internal shape of the valve. In dyno testing we have found that the power loss is minimal. The bypass valve offers great security against hydro locking the engine in rainy conditions. If maximum power is the requirement, we suggest that the bypass valve be used in the rainy season and when racing use a coupler hose to make a smooth section where the bypass valve goes.

Ok, so unless you're going to take your xB underwater or ford rivers, you're not gonna need this bypass valve.

Also, for people with the bypass valve installed, your intake is not harmonically tuned. The bypass valve would disrupt the harmonics of the intake.[/quote]
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 04:20 AM
  #30  
SoCalbBox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 195
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by ScionPimpN
Hydrolocking has been a subject of debate for sometime. But for such , one would think a serious problem. Who would of thought that AEM would be the only one to take notice and offer a bypassvalve for there intake systems. Now ive never hydrolocked my engine before, but i had a coldair intake on my focus and never had a problem with rain or water. I believe in someways a myth something to bring up and seel a product. Now not to say that hydrolocking hasnt happened but unless your in a flood I dont see a bypass valve a nesecity. Like I said 30+ intake companies make intake systems for cars and 1 has a bypass valve you be the judge if you need it :wink:
Hmm maybe there is a patent...I have know at least 9 people who have hydrolocked their motors. $40 saves you $4000 do you really have to think about it? People don't purposely drive through puddles but they don't purposely drive their cars into trees either, ____ happens.
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #31  
TheLeprechaun's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
From: Madison/Whitewater, WI
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalbBox
Originally Posted by ScionPimpN
Hydrolocking has been a subject of debate for sometime. But for such , one would think a serious problem. Who would of thought that AEM would be the only one to take notice and offer a bypassvalve for there intake systems. Now ive never hydrolocked my engine before, but i had a coldair intake on my focus and never had a problem with rain or water. I believe in someways a myth something to bring up and seel a product. Now not to say that hydrolocking hasnt happened but unless your in a flood I dont see a bypass valve a nesecity. Like I said 30+ intake companies make intake systems for cars and 1 has a bypass valve you be the judge if you need it
Hmm maybe there is a patent...I have know at least 9 people who have hydrolocked their motors. $40 saves you $4000 do you really have to think about it? People don't purposely drive through puddles but they don't purposely drive their cars into trees either, ____ happens.

I don't know anyone that's hydrolocked a motor before. I've even driven a fairly low car through 3 feet of water and still have not hydrolocked the engine. Granted, it didn't have an aftermarket intake, but not many people drive their cars through 3 feet of water either.

I'm not saying hydrolock isn't possible, but the chances of it are not likely. The air bypass valve saps power and costs more. You can't use the harmonically tuned intake with it either.
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #32  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by TheLeprechaun
I don't know anyone that's hydrolocked a motor before. I've even driven a fairly low car through 3 feet of water and still have not hydrolocked the engine. Granted, it didn't have an aftermarket intake, but not many people drive their cars through 3 feet of water either.

I'm not saying hydrolock isn't possible, but the chances of it are not likely. The air bypass valve saps power and costs more. You can't use the harmonically tuned intake with it either.
And buying a $40.00 part will obviously sap a lot of HP out of our 300HP vehicle. Come on man, do you really think it will take a lot of HP out of our cars? :? Well, if you are that stingy, we can't really judge you. But be sure to post up your hydrolocked motor when it happens. :D
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 06:08 PM
  #33  
TheLeprechaun's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
From: Madison/Whitewater, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Stylis
Originally Posted by TheLeprechaun
I don't know anyone that's hydrolocked a motor before. I've even driven a fairly low car through 3 feet of water and still have not hydrolocked the engine. Granted, it didn't have an aftermarket intake, but not many people drive their cars through 3 feet of water either.

I'm not saying hydrolock isn't possible, but the chances of it are not likely. The air bypass valve saps power and costs more. You can't use the harmonically tuned intake with it either.
And buying a $40.00 part will obviously sap a lot of HP out of our 300HP vehicle. Come on man, do you really think it will take a lot of HP out of our cars? :? Well, if you are that stingy, we can't really judge you. But be sure to post up your hydrolocked motor when it happens. :D

I'm not saying it's going to sap a lot of power out of the engine. But seriously, be realistic. You're buying a cold air intake to get more power out of your engine. Why would you install a part that limits it's ability to free up power?

I drive my motorcycle in the rain all the time. The actual intake track to the engine is a hell of a lot shorter than a cold air intake on an xB. My intake is much more susceptible to taking in water with the air. However, I still have yet to hydrolock my engine.

Your filter will have to be completely submerged for you even to suck up enough water to make hydrolocking a possibility. Even then, much of the water will evaporate on it's way to the engine.

Why is AEM the only supplier that markets the air bypass valve? I'm not saying it doesn't work, I'm just saying that it's not necessary unless you have huge potholes in your area and it rains all the time or you're gonna ford a river.
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #34  
ScionPimpN's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
N.G.S.O.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

thats what I said! one company makes the valve. Atleast someone has some sense to agree with me
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #35  
TheLeprechaun's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 31
From: Madison/Whitewater, WI
Default

Originally Posted by ScionPimpN
thats what I said! one company makes the valve. Atleast someone has some sense to agree with me

Just restating your point


Also, form what I've read, the injen short ram air intake is cheaper, makes more power than the AEM intake, and has a substantially smaller chance of hydrolock than the AEM. Yet, the Injen intake is cheaper.

I'm not attacking the AEM intake here, it's a great looking intake and is manufactured well. But the whole purpose is to gain horsepower with this. Why pay more to gain less power?
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #36  
SoCalbBox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 195
From: SoCal
Default

[quote="TheLeprechaun"][quote="Stylis"]
Originally Posted by TheLeprechaun

Your filter will have to be completely submerged for you even to suck up enough water to make hydrolocking a possibility. Even then, much of the water will evaporate on it's way to the engine.

Why is AEM the only supplier that markets the air bypass valve? I'm not saying it doesn't work, I'm just saying that it's not necessary unless you have huge potholes in your area and it rains all the time or you're gonna ford a river.
To hydrolock your engine you have to completely submerged the filter. No the water will not evaporate on the way to the engine. There have been a few companies that have tried to copy design, but like I said its got a patent. So other companies recommend AEM's bypass valve since they can't copy it.
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #37  
rotarycolt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalbBox

Hmm maybe there is a patent...I have know at least 9 people who have hydrolocked their motors. $40 saves you $4000 do you really have to think about it? People don't purposely drive through puddles but they don't purposely drive their cars into trees either, ____ happens.
The concept cant be patented. The design, yes, but not the concept. If it were so important, another company would release one.

I also highly doubt you know anyone that hydrolocked their engine... They'd have to submerge the filter almost ENTIRELY to get enough suction to move a large body of water into engine!!!

Any droplets that DO make it into the intake tract will be evaporated by the heat before they do any damage... atleast this is what I've come to believe.
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 07:31 PM
  #38  
AKgoalie7's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 501
From: My-Am-Eeeeee
Default

so.. back to the subject...


the link i posted.... the AEM there is a short ram??? Does anyone know if it performs better than the dealer installed?

I'm getting an intake with my tax return money.. But I cannot decide between the Typhoon and the Injen..... hmmmm..


Think it would be nice for a new dyno shootout.... with new intakes...

Injen..Spfr...AEM (dealer and short).. Weapon R... K&N.. and any others i left out??
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 09:36 PM
  #39  
SoCalbBox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 195
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by AKgoalie7
so.. back to the subject...


the link i posted.... the AEM there is a short ram??? Does anyone know if it performs better than the dealer installed?

I'm getting an intake with my tax return money.. But I cannot decide between the Typhoon and the Injen..... hmmmm..


Think it would be nice for a new dyno shootout.... with new intakes...

Injen..Spfr...AEM (dealer and short).. Weapon R... K&N.. and any others i left out??
No short ram, but 2 cold air intakes. IT's powerpage should be out soon for the xB with that intake, header and exhaust for your dyno results.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrowJenkins
Scion tC 2G Owners Lounge
5
Oct 9, 2015 10:47 PM
vi3tb0i09
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
2
Sep 23, 2015 08:32 PM
Chrono
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
0
Aug 25, 2015 05:59 PM
That_Kid_Ju
Scion tC 2G Drivetrain & Power
0
Aug 14, 2015 12:41 PM
Ravendarat
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Owners Lounge
1
Jun 9, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.